LATEST CHATTY HEADER
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
New to Shacknews? Signup for a Free Account
Already have an account? Login Now
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
"Applications must not contain any obscene, pornographic, offensive or defamatory content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, etc.), or other content or materials that in Apple's reasonable judgement may be found objectionable by iPhone or iPod touch users."
For example, a link to a nude photograph was available in the app. A screenshot is attached.
http://beautifulpixel.com/assets/2008/8/7/nws.png
Nice goin' pancake.
I was afraid of this actually. I just upgraded the API to included post categories, and it looks like I have to force NWS to off. I know it sucks.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 203 replies.
It is weird how their QA is so subjective but I don't see anything wrong with them not allowing Flying Rider to be released in its current state based on what it says on your site. (Well, I do, in that I think the platform should be open but that's another argument and if they are going to have an app approval process then it's bugs & incorrect behaviour that it should focus on.)
The post has been reported. Thank you!
You must be logged in to post.
You must be logged in to post.