Nintendo sued over 3DS screen technology

The Nintendo 3DS allegedly infringes upon a glasses-free 3D patent filed in 2003, according to a new lawsuit placed against the hardware manufacturer.

15

Tomita Technologies recently brought suit against Nintendo for allegedly infringing on a patent filed in 2003 and issued in 2008. Patent 7417664--"Stereoscopic image picking up and display system based upon optical axes cross-point information"--does have some similarities to the recently-released 3DS. Primarily, the patent is for a "pick-up and display system" that can offer stereoscopic 3D imagery by displaying different images to each eye. The end result is 3D without glasses, a key feature of Nintendo's handheld.

"Nintendo's America's infringement of the '664 patent has been, and continues to be, willful," the complaint alleges, without detailing the exact nature of the infringement. Tomita claims to be damaged "in an amount not yet determined." The company is seeking a trial by jury, and awaits a decision by the court.

Nintendo is no stranger to litigation, with each platform launch eventually meeting a lawsuit. The Wii's motion controls and DS' touch controls have been the topic of previous suits.

We've reached out to Nintendo of America for comment.

Filed Under
From The Chatty
  • reply
    July 6, 2011 3:30 PM

    Andrew Yoon posted a new article, Nintendo sued over 3DS screen technology.

    The Nintendo 3DS allegedly infringes upon a glasses-free 3D patent filed in 2003, according to a new lawsuit placed against the hardware manufacturer.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 3:37 PM

      Patent law should be revised. I think that a working prototype should be required before patenting some stuff.

      • reply
        July 6, 2011 4:09 PM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          July 6, 2011 4:20 PM

          seriously. it's getting just silly.

      • reply
        July 6, 2011 5:30 PM

        A working prototype should definitely be the hurdle for someone wanting a patent.

      • reply
        July 6, 2011 5:37 PM

        Great, so when giant corporation nintendo steals your idea and beats you to market, they then own your idea.
        You know prototypes cost money... designers and inventors wouldn't be able to own their own inventions cause patents are how you own your own idea.

        • reply
          July 6, 2011 5:41 PM

          An idea is not the same thing as an invention.

          Ideas are a dime a dozen.

          • reply
            July 6, 2011 8:03 PM

            Do you think that a precise schematic for a new type of processor is dime a dozen because it hasn't been manufactured yet?

            • reply
              July 7, 2011 9:11 AM

              have you seen some of these "patents"? They are ridiculously vague

            • reply
              July 7, 2011 9:13 AM

              Yep, because until you make one who knows if it works and if its actually novel.

      • reply
        July 6, 2011 7:46 PM

        Agreeded... There should be a limit to how long you can hold on to that patent if you do NOTHING WITH IT... That's the part that really gets me is that they do nothing with it and just sit around until someone does and sue em... SAd

      • reply
        July 7, 2011 9:41 AM

        this isn't the same frivoulous type of case where someone patents 'moving a finger to do something'..this is a pretty detailed method of displaying 3d. I think they have a case.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 3:38 PM

      this kind of shit is so gay

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 3:50 PM

      It didn't take me two minutes to Google older patents on stereoscopic and/or parallax barrier stuff.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 5:12 PM

      Why do companies wait so fricken long to pull this crap? I would give some merit if it was brought up like a month of it's existance... These lawsuits are a waste of time. If you have a product out on the market then this vapor crap then that's one thing. To patent something to have never created the product is lame.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 5:29 PM

      Not sure how this is different from what Sharp originally developed years before Nintendo even thought of this. But, maybe it's all in the definition of "pick-up and display"??? meh.

      • reply
        July 6, 2011 7:48 PM

        IIRC, Nintendo is using a Sharp display for the 3DS.

        • reply
          July 6, 2011 9:43 PM

          Exactly. They see easy settlement money with Nintendo as the defendent.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 9:14 PM

      Same old story. If it's successful, it's ours. If it's crap, we don't give a shit. Every time.

    • reply
      July 6, 2011 9:26 PM

      Reading through the claims this seems like a very different device than the 3DS. Only the first claim really seems similar, and only in a general sense. I'm not a patent lawyer by any means, but I'd fight this one, I think. Especially given they've been experimenting with 3D since well before the patent was applied for.

    • reply
      July 7, 2011 9:09 AM

      Proving once again.... Nintendo has no ideas of their own anymore....

Hello, Meet Lola