LATEST CHATTY HEADER
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
New to Shacknews? Signup for a Free Account
Already have an account? Login Now
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
> One of the popular open-source tools had a default configuration to store their backups in S3. And, as a placeholder for a bucket name, they used the same name that I used for my bucket.
> This meant that every deployment of this tool with default configuration values attempted to store its backups in my S3 bucket!
https://medium.com/@maciej.pocwierz/how-an-empty-s3-bucket-can-make-your-aws-bill-explode-934a383cb8b1
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 35 replies.
The AWS guy in the Twitter thread seemed to be saying they will change their billing to eat such charges. Hope that happens.
The post has been reported. Thank you!
You must be logged in to post.
You must be logged in to post.