Tomb Raider Dev Sees Layoffs Amidst Increased Focus on Series, Looking at Batman-like Redesign

Those rumored layoffs at Tomb Raider: Underworld developer Crystal Dynamics have been confirmed by studio owner Eidos, with the company telling Joystiq that this was a result of an increased "focus on the Tomb Raider franchise at Crystal Dynamics."

Roughly 30 employees were laid off, including Tomb Raider: Underworld creative director Eric Lindstrom. It is not known if Crystal Dynamics was working on any non-Tomb Raider games--the studio is believed to be wrapping up the 360-exclusive TR:U downloadable content, and doing tentative work on the next Tomb Raider.

The layoffs came on the same day that Eidos expressed disappointment that Tomb Raider: Underworld only sold 1.5 million units, which may prompt a redesign.

That new direction could be "female-friendly," reports TimesOnline, adding that Eidos expected Tomb Raider: Underworld to sell 2 million--a milestone it missed by 500K.

"Look at how Batman changed successfully, from the rather sad character of the Michael Keaton era to the noir style of The Dark Knight," said Eidos CFO Robert Brent. "We need to look at everything, as we develop the next [Tomb Raider] game."

In a thread on the fan-run Tomb Raider forums, creative director Lindstorm revealed he was one of those that lost their jobs, with a site administrator confirming his identity, and addressed speculation that game content was cut for the sole purpose of DLC.

He explained:

I can tell you without doubt that the content of DLC was absolutely not held back from Underworld for the purpose of selling later down the road. I am one of only three people who knows this for sure because not only were there only three of us in the room at the time the decision was made, I was the one who made it. We had a production issue that was going to make us miss our ship date -- which we could not do -- and I needed to find a way to cut enough days from the schedule in a manner that would not rip a hole in the game that would take time to sew up. It was my idea to cut what was cut, and I did hope that it would one day be made available as a download mission, because there was great content already conceived and half completed, but on the day we made the cut, it was made purely for Underworld production reasons. Even if I was told on that day that we would never ever make a downloabable level, I still would have had to cut it. Anyone who says otherwise is speculating or heard someone else speculating, and is incorrect.

Lindstorm's statement came shortly after another alleged ex-employees began posting and claimed the team was "asked to cut some parts out to be used in the DLC."

Thanks to Luckyg and manlyman for the forum links and information.

Chris Faylor was previously a games journalist creating content at Shacknews.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    January 12, 2009 8:32 AM

    "Look at how Batman changed successfully, from the rather sad character of the Michael Keaton era." Rather sad? I don't completely agree with how director Tim Burton portrayed Batman in Batman and Batman Begins, but if anything, that era rejuvenated the character. The darkness was something inherent in Batman that Burton brought out. His big mistake was allowing Batman to kill, but that's neither here nor there.

    It was the Schumacher era that made the Batman a "sad" character. Yeesh.

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 8:33 AM

      Haha - just what I was thinking.

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 8:37 AM

      Didn't Crystal Dynamics already do that to a "sad" Tomb Raider?

      I'm more inclined to think Eidos' actions will be more akin to taking the Nolan Batman and putting it back to Schumacher.

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 9:05 AM

      Yeah i was thinking this too haha

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 9:41 AM

      *Batman Begins = Batman Returns. I think everyone knew what I meant, though. ;)

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 10:54 AM

      Seriously, what the FUCK? Tim Burton's version with Michael Keaton was the first live action version of Batman with any hint of darkness. Prior to Burton, we had the campy Adam West Batman:

      • reply
        January 12, 2009 10:55 AM

        buzz.. wrong totally not true. The 1940s seriel movies of Batman, cheap floppy ear costume aside was fairly dark for the time period and totally serious compared to the later Adam West series.

        • reply
          January 12, 2009 11:07 AM

          Okay, I'll trust you on this one. :-) But for the average joe in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, "Batman" was the buffoon on that Adam West TV show. There was a far greater change in tone and quality from Adam West to Michael Keaton than from Michael Keaton to Christian Bale.

    • reply
      January 12, 2009 2:14 PM

      S'funny. I, too had pulled that quote to comment on. But my take was that it was the movies that cast such a light. In the comics, he was always a dark predator of the night. He had the occasional angst-y moment, but I dare you to be a billionaire and get 3 pieces of tail in 25 years or so and not be angst-y sometimes...And then Bane showed up.

Hello, Meet Lola