LATEST CHATTY HEADER
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
New to Shacknews? Signup for a Free Account
Already have an account? Login Now
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
That being said, the new ads are bullshit. Moreover, nuking threads about the ads is even worse. geedeck asked me to direct my questions to staff instead of "randomly" posting about it here. When did discussing Shack policy become random, let alone nukable? The whole point of my question earlier was to see if anyone else here felt the same way. I don't want some mod's response repeating what GameFly's offical line. I want to see what posters think. Maybe I'm overreacting but I was one of the people that scoffed at the notion that Steve's sale of the Shack would change anything here. Maybe I was wrong.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 151 replies.
http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=19946393
http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=19919246
http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=19797765
Want me to go on? because there are worse.... that is only what I could find with the crappy shack search.
As for the porn argument, so that only applies to porn right? anything else anyone posts about copyrighted material immediately gets nuked I guess? strange, that seems somewhat hypocritical don't you think? We care about the law, except, in the case of naked women (we hope)... those people have to mail us.
And yet, because we are talking about OTHER stuff, and not ad blockers proves my point on how retarded it is. You can't even present a good argument on why they are disallowed... only to say "for a couple of reasons"
The post has been reported. Thank you!
You must be logged in to post.
You must be logged in to post.