LATEST CHATTY HEADER
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
New to Shacknews? Signup for a Free Account
Already have an account? Login Now
Subscribe to Shacknews Mercury starting at $1/month!
Chrome Shack Community Guidelines Chatty Search
Scroll down to join the conversation.
???? Edition!!!
?
Multiplayer Servers!
MercFox1 : shackeast.sytes.net
- Latest MercFox1 render: http://box.nevernet.com/~djr/mc/render.png
AgentPothead : shackcraft.sytes.net
Shadowdane (snow world) : shadowdane.shacknet.nu
Chicken Fur : 69.169.149.253
m0rfus (PvP/Mobs on) : 173.201.191.198
Teamspeak : ts.shackbattles.com : 9987
!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 515 replies.
Good Isengard
Pros
+ Easier to build, since we've been building towards that all along
+ I personally like the entry through the forest. Especially because mobs will spawn in the forest eventually, making it nice and creepy
Cons
- Obviously more griefable (fool me once, etc etc) but the whitelist may ameliorate that some
- If anything the trees make the tower look more stumpy: compare http://www.shackpics.com/files/Orthanc2_rdvfwoj7szrrf10qioen.jpg to http://www.shackpics.com/files/Orthanc1_ve6taeygxpdw5os9kqos.jpg (these are taken at different distances, but it's close enough).
Evil Isengard
Pros
+ Less griefable, although there WILL be lava and burning shit everywhere. If anything it'll look like we were griefed again :P
+ You've got to admit it'd look badass
Cons
- It's about 4x the work. We'd have to rip up the grass and replace with stone; dig giant pits and fill the bottom with lava; repave the paths with gravel to make them look burnt; etc etc.
- It'd be a lot harder to do RIGHT
- There's already tunnels under Isengard that I'd need to reroute for the big holes in the ground.
So what say you, Shack?
The post has been reported. Thank you!
You must be logged in to post.
You must be logged in to post.