Report: Respawn's new game is TitanFall for Xbox One, PC

It appears that the rumors were true. Respawn Entertainment's first title will be a multiplayer centric mech shooter call Titanfall, and is expected to be a Microsoft exclusive for Xbox 360, Xbox One and PC.

15

It appears that the rumors were true. Respawn Entertainment, the team comprised mostly of former Modern Warfare devs will be making a multiplayer-centric mech shooter called TitanFall. According to an early copy of Game Informer magazine, it will be a Microsoft exclusive for Xbox 360, Xbox One, and PC.

Apparently, Google Play released the magazine early and a post on NeoGAF has run a large synopsis of the article. The futuristic shooter will focus on huge mechs called Titans that can be piloted by players. Players can also run around on foot and shoot things, and are able to leap atop mechs to blow out their "brains." The game uses a modified version of Valve's Source engine, with "major portions" rewritten by Respawn. The game is expected to run at 60 frames per second.

The game will apparently make heavy use of the Xbox One's cloud processing support. Respawn will be handling the Xbox One and PC versions, while a separate developer will be handling the Xbox 360 version.

The game is set for a spring 2014 release.

Contributing Editor
From The Chatty
  • reply
    June 6, 2013 7:55 AM

    John Keefer posted a new article, Report: Respawn's new game is TitanFall for Xbox One, PC.

    It appears that the rumors were true. Respawn Entertainment's first title will be a multiplayer centric mech shooter call Titanfall, and is expected to be a Microsoft exclusive for Xbox 360, Xbox One and PC.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 8:17 AM

      Interesting, I'll hold off judgment until I see what the PC version looks like as well as the specifics of the gameplay.

      Otherwise, it seems somewhat original, let's hope it is.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 8:30 AM

      Sounds cool

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 8:45 AM

      Using Source? Kinda surprising, but okay.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 9:37 AM

        Kinda makes sense though, the engine performs exceptionally well, still looks good and is probably fairly affordable for licensing.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 4:05 PM

        They should be familiar with it, as it uses the same quake source code as their earlier engine.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 7:18 PM

        It makes perfect sense. I am sure they wanted to use a quake based or quake like engine and tool set.

        Their options would be to then pick either quake 3, doom3, Rage, or source.

        If they picked Quake 3 they have to write too much new code because quake 3 is SUPER bare bones on the game code side and also lacking a ton of engine features.

        Doom 3 is also super old but would come with a lot more game code and scripting tools but the engine really isn't set up for no SP games and all the lighting stuff would have to be replaced.

        Rage probably isn't for sale anymore and besides the Mega Texture stuff sounds like a huge pain in the ass and id is relying too much on designers using Modo or whatever 3d package... though maybe that isn't such a bad idea because I have worked that way before and it was pretty good using 3d studio as a level editor in some ways......... making anything you want without restrictions.... but in Rage they import all that junk still into their version of radiant. Still I don't think id tech is for sale anyway.

        Source however has been kind of sort of updated with new features at least compared to Doom3 and Quake 3, it is for sale, it's additive BSP based instead of Subtractive and level construction is almost exactly like the COD tools EXCEPT for it doesn't have good patch/terrain/poly support.... but they could add that. Also they are going to have to write a new scripting system instead of the funky source version, but they can add that. I don't think Source has a good prefab system but it has something close, so they can add that. Does source run super fast though like Quake3???? hmm unsure.

        Unreal is out because it's all imported static meshes and subtractive BSP which is the opposite of what they were doing with the COD tools. It also doesn't have good patch/poly/terrain support in the editor to make any shapes you want without restriction. The scripting system for unreal is the visual Kismet which is the opposite of what COD tools have. Basically everything in unreal is the opposite of everything COD's tools have.

        They were trying to get something that was the closest to their old toolset and they don't have many options so Source makes sense.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 9:09 AM

      So there are actually offloading calculations to the cloud? Interesting. Garnette, care to comment on that?

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 11:25 AM

        seems like it could be a disaster if they were to actually offload physics to the cloud. Those seem like time-sensitive calculations.

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 1:51 PM

          I doubt they'd offload something like physics.

          I'm reminded though of something I read about the portal algorithm in Portal. They use an initial algorithm that computes super fast and is 95% accurate the instant the portal is created, and then a second algorithm runs that takes a lot longer to process (like 0.1 second) that is 100% accurate. This way the portal opens and is usable instantly, and is 100% accurate 0.1 second later.

          Something similar could be done with cloud computing algorithms taking 0.2 sec to process and then return, and using a faster initial algorithm in the meantime. Pathing could be done this way - get the unit/NPC moving in 95% the right direction, and .2 sec later they move in 100% the right direction.

          I'm just thinking out loud, I have no idea how this stuff will be done in the reality, but this cloud computing thing could be more useful than people are giving it credit.

          • reply
            June 6, 2013 2:32 PM

            But in this case, the more costly algorithm is the one that has to be calculated at the last possible second, and having that calculated remotely, then having the results transmitted to the client, would result in hitching due to network latency.

            It's also possible that they're offloading to cloud processing for the sake of having cloud processing. If the rumors of a year-long XBox One exclusivity are true, that could be the downpayment for a discount on Microsoft Azure for the dedicated servers they want to run for all the platforms.

            This title sounds like a "we'll announce details when we solidify things, and/or when we feel the audience will best receive it", but it smacks of a MW2 "let's not announce IWNet until 3 weeks before release" kind of situation, so I'm not investing myself in this title at all. I'm just going to sit off to the sidelines, and continue playing "Steam or nothing" PC first person shooters.

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 6:04 PM

          They can offload physics for things which are not time (latency) sensitive. The example I used somewhere else was the particle physics of a massive waterfall... it could be calculated in the cloud as you enter the level and then streamed to the console as you get closer. It's almost like pre-rendering a 3D scene for video but just the physics are being pre-calculated not the actual 3d objects. Somebody else mentioned that you could have higher level AI routines (the strategic overview level of AI) processed in the cloud with the tactical smaller-scale stuff processed on the fly. There is also the idea of what Onlive and Gakai are doing with rendering a scene and streaming it to you as a video stream. That could be used for something like a video screen or a viewport in a spaceship where the stuff through the 'window' is being calculated in the cloud, rendered and streamed to you. There's a lot of stuff which could be done... if their cloud stuff is up to the challenge and if it actually does work the way they are saying.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 1:55 PM

        Garnett doesn't post here, you must be thinking of Neogaf

        • reply
          June 7, 2013 10:18 PM

          I realize that. However, they do read the through the comments and sometimes discuss in the weekend confirmed.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 2:49 PM

        World of Tanks does all hit calculations (including shell penetrations versus armor and deflections) and damage calculations server side...

        any eye candy physics can be done client side

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 3:04 PM

        If anyone is interested in how "cloud" gaming would play, try Diablo 3, basically anytime there's a hiccup in your internet the area won't load. Also rubberbanding.

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 3:05 PM

          P.S. and it's actually fine in Diablo 3, it happens rarely. However I'm willing to put up with stuff in a multiplayer game that would drive me nuts in a single player game (rubberbanding would really kill immersion).

          • reply
            June 6, 2013 3:08 PM

            Also, I have yet to see a game that calculates anything of value in "the cloud" and doesn't just use it as online-only DRM. Diablo 3 could easily be done without streaming data.

            Is there an example of an online-only game that doesn't treat "streaming gameplay" as anything other than DRM?

            • reply
              June 6, 2013 6:04 PM

              Um, any MMO? Most of the popular MOBAs, any social game, and almost any F2P game regardless of platform. The only games I know that had an always online requirement that was primarily motivated by DRM are a select few Ubisoft PC titles. The rest (and I am including Simcity and Diablo 3 in this) are online only by design, designs which have angered many legacy fans of those franchises but designs nonetheless.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 6:12 PM

        Cross post this to Neogaf, he'll see it there.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 9:28 AM

      So this cloud thing is real huh? Curious to see how this all pans out. The PS4 having not only faster RAM but 3GB more of it is kind of a huge deal.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 2:33 PM

      Neogaf as always breaking out with the leaks
      http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=61609681&postcount=1

      Looks like it's using a heavily-modified Source engine.

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 2:36 PM

        "Hulking 24-foot tall mechs concentrate heavy fire on anything that moves while lithe soldiers zip across the map with a swiftness normally reserved for superheroes"

        "Legions of AI soldiers pour in and out of buildings on a large-scale battlefield as dropships deliver reinforcements from above"

        Weapons of soldiers can vaporize multiple targets at once, but the mechs can repel shots back.

        Blurs line between competitive multiplayer and single player.

        "The titans move at the speed of a regular soldier in many first person shooters and feature an array of heavy firepower that make them formidable adversaries in open space"

        Titans best offense is good defense.

        Titans can be player controlled or can be commanded to guard an area or follow you around.

        More to come...

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 2:59 PM

          another dota then

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 7:44 PM

          Whoah...this actually sounds kind of cool. I'm intrigued anyway...

        • reply
          June 6, 2013 7:51 PM

          amazing epic shit happens that you won't believe... hyper advanced next-gen graphics and zero-latency drop-in/drop-out multiplayer... game engine so flexible that you can literally do anything that you can imagine...

          Click here to pre-order

      • reply
        June 6, 2013 2:53 PM

        Source engine? Weird. Not what I was expecting at all.

        I guess it's not much different from what the old Infinity Ward did with Quake 3 for Call of Duty though.

    • reply
      June 6, 2013 3:45 PM

      strafe jumping please? PLEASE~!?!?!

    • reply
      June 7, 2013 9:37 AM

      A mech game? Was king of hoping for something more from the creators of the call of duty series.

Hello, Meet Lola