Battlefield 3's 'Back to Karkand' content will be part of regular map rotation

EA has clarified that maps featured in the 'Back to Karkand' DLC for Battlefield 3 will be "part of the same rotation as the base maps" once the content becomes available.

39

EA has clarified that maps featured in the upcoming 'Back to Karkand' DLC for Battlefield 3 will be "part of the same rotation as the base maps" once the content becomes available. A tweet this morning from the official Battlefield account, which was since been deleted, originally stated that the DLC maps would only be playable in a "separate map rotation," much like Bad Company 2's 'Vietnam' DLC.

EA confirmed the original message was incorrect to Joystiq. When asked if future downloadable content would follow the same policy, EA noted that it has yet to announce details for future DLC and it currently focused on launching the Karkand content.

Battlefield 3's homage DLC 'Back to Karkand' launches in December and features four "classic" maps from Battlefield 2. Though the content will be made available for $15 when it launches, it will be made available for free to users that ordered Battlefield 3 prior to its October 25 launch date.

[Image of the original Tweet available from Joystiq]

Xav de Matos was previously a games journalist creating content at Shacknews.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    November 11, 2011 6:45 PM

    Xav de Matos posted a new article, Battlefield 3's 'Back to Karkand' content will be part of regular map rotation.

    EA has clarified that maps featured in the 'Back to Karkand' DLC for Battlefield 3 will be "part of the same rotation as the base maps" once the content becomes available.

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 6:55 PM

      Oh good we were just talking about this today, glad to hear that it won't be seperated ala Vietnam!

      • reply
        November 11, 2011 6:59 PM

        yah glad very awesome this can be rolled into the same rotation... would suck to have to setup a separate server for the new maps.

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 7:08 PM

      What a horrible roller coaster over the DLC with this game.

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 8:19 PM

      So if someone doesn't have the DLC, do they get kicked from the server?

      • reply
        November 11, 2011 8:28 PM

        I'd guess yes this is what would happen

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 6:52 AM

          The server admin should be able to remove it from the rotation again.

      • reply
        November 11, 2011 8:32 PM

        If someone doesn't have this DLC, they obviously aren't worth of SHALLA HAKALLA AHSHEM!! MEC MOTHER FUCKERS!

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 7:12 AM

        c'mon, that would be a total miss-step on their part it kicks to a full-page DLC ad in Origin

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 9:25 PM

      wish they had more like songhua stalemate... loved that map

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 10:55 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        November 11, 2011 10:57 PM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        November 11, 2011 11:05 PM

        you didn't pre-order?

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 12:14 AM

          Obviously not, the game wasn't on steam.

          • reply
            November 12, 2011 9:58 AM

            You say obviously like most people agree with you. Most of us don't.

            • reply
              November 12, 2011 10:09 AM

              I agree with him you deject

              • reply
                November 12, 2011 10:23 AM

                Maybe 10% of shackers avoid BF3 because it's not on Steam. We even managed to cow MercFox into buying it.

            • reply
              November 12, 2011 10:10 AM

              Some of us don't preorder anything

              • reply
                November 12, 2011 10:22 AM

                That's fair. I've gotten burned by preordering stuff a couple times.

                I was mostly referring to the "it not being on Steam" part though.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 6:46 AM

          You can still get copies of the limited edition BF3 from plenty of places online. Newegg is one of them. I bought the game 2 weeks after release and I'll still get the DLC.

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 5:40 AM

        get the maps then.

      • reply
        November 14, 2011 8:43 AM

        [deleted]

    • reply
      November 11, 2011 11:47 PM

      I am looking forward to hearing people complain about buying a used 360 copy, then having to pay $10 for the "online pass" and another $10-15 for the map pack. Should have pre-ordered! These guys are figuring out quick how to recover lost revenue to the used market.

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 2:47 AM

        So... preordering it's a chance they give you for not to be robbed by them, right?
        Sigh, and people complaint about Activision.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 2:55 AM

          It was an incentive that you'd get it for free if you pre-order. So if you didn't pre-order, you don't get it for free. Where is the robbery?

          • reply
            November 12, 2011 3:05 AM

            The robbery comes after that "great offer".

            • reply
              November 12, 2011 8:31 AM

              lol grow up and use the correct definition of the word and stop acting like a whiny child.

              • reply
                November 12, 2011 10:03 AM

                Steal or whatever, it doesn't change the fact that those should be in the game and even if the maps were not made its a really high price.
                The maps are made, and if for whatever reason you cannot preorder it or you doesn't want to preorder it, you have to pay for it, something that had to be there in the first place.

                Its like if cars were sold with 4 seats if you reserved one before they were made and if you disnt reserve it they removed 2-3 seats and you had to buy them after.

                And its not whinning im just stating my opinion. And if your only argument to make me stop saying my opinion is that i chose the wrong word (english is not my primary language)... then i find that your words lack weigh.

                • reply
                  November 12, 2011 10:09 AM

                  So by your definition all map packs ever made should be free cause they are made for the game?

                  • reply
                    November 12, 2011 8:55 PM

                    Long ago, before you were born, there was a land where gamers could make their own maps. It was a glorious land full of creativity and community. Now that land is no more.

                    THE LEGEND OF FREE MAPIA LIVES ON INSIDE ME.

                    • reply
                      November 12, 2011 10:58 PM

                      +1 ;)

                    • reply
                      November 13, 2011 2:59 AM

                      It was a good time xD.
                      But.... 15 dollars for 4 maps.... if you pick up the size of the maps and compare it to the size of the campain of, lets say, half life 2 and try to put the price in the same proportion..... half life 2 would probably cost 200-300 dollars xD.

                • reply
                  November 13, 2011 10:28 AM

                  Your arguement doesn't hold water. It's like saying the sports rims are made so your car should have them for free. No they're made to be sold as an addon, just like the map pack. Holding back something from sale is NOT robbery or stealing. Just cause it is made does not entitle you to it. Of course if you could explain otherwise I'm all ears.

                  • reply
                    November 13, 2011 11:13 PM

                    If the cost of the maps is really high compared to the size / quality of the product its practically stealing, and it is.

                    And even if the fact that the maps were popular made the price rise, they were there in the first game to begin with, so separating something that was there from the main product to sell them at a high price is kind of a steal.

                    In what you said, imagine they removed the seats, yea it would still move but it wont be the same (well in the car even more because it will be a security risk xD).

                    And here is a important point : but not having the seats wont lower the price of the car. Then they will sell you the seats for 1/4 of the total price of the car (they are selling the maps at this ratio), but oh if you preordered a car you wont have to pay 1/4 extra more of the car, the ones that preordered are happy yea, they give you something advertised as "free", but the rest are punished instead of not having X benefit from preordering, because as i said the maps were there in the first game, its not an addon, its something that they artificially made an addon.

                    If karkand wasn't there in the first game and they weren't selling it at a 1/4 of the price of the game, then it will be ok, but thats not the case.

                    If it was like in warhammer retribution in wich the price of the product was lower than average of the games and then they sold extra equipment for the campaing at the begining and other things along the way, then thats totally ok, because you didn't have to pay for the extras in the price of the game and then pay again for the extras when you want them.
                    And the price isn't high either except the skin packs, wich aren't a game changer (or fragment the comunity), they just make you look badass :).

                    • reply
                      November 14, 2011 8:20 AM

                      You have to remember, they remade these maps with the new engine. They're not ported. So charging $15 for their time and effort to bring the maps to BF3 is a steal.

                    • reply
                      November 14, 2011 1:07 PM

                      You don't know much about map making do you? You think they just imported the maps and tweaked a few things? They have to build whole new assets, cause it's a whole new engine. Of course they'd resuse assets from the base game, but actual work has to go in to make the maps work for Frostbite 2. They are in fact, not already in the 'car'.

          • reply
            November 12, 2011 7:48 AM

            You also got it free for buying the limited edition. I walked into Fry's and grabbed a copy which had the code in it for me to use.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 4:50 AM

          [deleted]

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 9:12 AM

          You mean nobody is complaining about EA? lol Also yeah of course, they offer you "not" to get robbed when you buy the game before anyone had a chance to see if it was any good, cat in bag etc.

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 7:21 AM

        "should have pre-ordered" that's such a dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb argument. why should people be forced to buy every game before they even know if it's riddled with bugs or they won't even enjoy what have you.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 7:24 AM

          [deleted]

          • reply
            November 13, 2011 12:36 AM

            yeah the bonus was known well in advance to the game's release too. MONTHS in advance. ah well i got the LE so i don't really care.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 8:32 AM

          They took the risk, they save 15 bucks. What's so hard to understand about this? No one understands risk-reward in life, everything has to be served up on a platter?

          • reply
            November 12, 2011 10:33 AM

            That should only apply to real life choices, not buying a fucking video game. Plus there's already risk built in -- even if a lot of other people like it after the fact, there's no guarantee that a particular person will like it.

            Plus it shows a real lack of confidence in the product on the publisher's part.

            • reply
              November 13, 2011 10:23 AM

              Lol buying a vid game is a real life choice. You are choosing how to use, or not use, your money at a particular time. You buy it early, save 15 bucks but might get a bad game. Wait and see, don't save the 15 bucks. Why is spending 60 bucks not a real life choice?

          • reply
            November 14, 2011 8:44 AM

            [deleted]

            • reply
              November 14, 2011 1:04 PM

              Haha you're the one off base dude, it's FIFTEEN bucks. How does that compare with your retirement fund or how you make a living? Get a grip.

              • reply
                November 14, 2011 1:12 PM

                Look, life is about making choices. If you choose not to pre-order, then you miss out on getting the Karkand pack for free. So you miss out. That's the consequence of YOUR choice. It's called the pros and the cons, like anything else. Why don't you explain to us all why you feel you are entitled to the map pack? Cause if I thought like you I'd tell Toyota my pickup should come up with all the accessories JUST BECAUSE.

                • reply
                  November 19, 2011 11:36 AM

                  You are an odd fellow. Gamers who were around before DLC know that this kinda shit is abuse to the customer and harms the community. Someone who comes in later and buys the game gets split from the community when the map changes and they don't own that particular map. Not everyone has 15 bucks laying around after spending 60 dollars on a video game, and thus causes fractures in the community.

                  • reply
                    November 19, 2011 8:44 PM

                    Buddy, way to go on your assumptions. I'm 31, I was around before DLC. I too am worried about a fractured community but gaming is not the same as ten years ago. Games take a lot more money to make, a harsh reality that people love to ignore. As long as this is handled well, I don't see a problem. Don't have a DLC? Untick it when searching for servers. Also we'll see how much traction this gets. If a lot of people get it, then no problem win for everybody. If the response is poor, and it's easier to track than ever, EA will stop because it's unprofitable.

                    And anyway the point of this sub thread was whether or not people should have pre-ordered or not. As I've said above, it's a choice, so it comes down to the road taken or not taken, just like a lot of things in life.

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 9:59 AM

        Or not get sale at all.

    • reply
      November 12, 2011 2:47 AM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 7:28 AM

        This is the same thing as BF2. Servers with the new maps mixed in the rotation will empty out when they change to those maps. So eventually there will be servers running vanilla only and servers running Karkand only.

        As the game gets older and more people buy it the number of people without Karkand will increase.

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 8:36 AM

          Except they will likely release the maps for free in a year or two.

    • reply
      November 12, 2011 2:58 AM

      Although I think this is good and will keep populations "together" I kinda feel bad for the newbs who didn't preorder, getting kicked every few maps would be a pain. The solution would be for the game to auto matchmake them to another server i guess.

    • reply
      November 12, 2011 5:39 AM

      WHEN? hurry the fuck up and ship publish it

    • reply
      November 12, 2011 7:19 AM

      They better fix it so I can leave the fucking game with my squad and go to a new game easily. That is so broken and annoying on 360 now and this will only make matters worse

      • reply
        November 12, 2011 7:30 AM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          November 12, 2011 10:12 AM

          Yeah and have a map vote at least. Like every other game ever. Some of these problems make me want to give up on this series. Such basic shit they screwed up.

    • reply
      November 19, 2011 12:21 PM

      I guess that this kind of thing means the end of things like Desert Combat?How meany here remember DC ? Hell it was'nt that long ago was it ??

Hello, Meet Lola