Rage Will Look Worse on 360 Due to Compression; Doom 4 and Rage Not Likely for Digital Distribution
by Nick Breckon and Chris Faylor, Aug 01, 2008 6:10pm PDTUpdate: In an interview with Shacknews, id's John Carmack reiterated that the Xbox 360 version of Rage will look worse than the PlayStation 3 version.
Carmack said that the uncompressed build of Rage encompasses a terrabyte of data, and that id will need to use a "different type of compression" to fit the game on two dual-layer Xbox 360 DVDs.
When asked whether the difference will be significant, Carmack noted that "hero shots" should look similar, but that Xbox 360 players might find a rock that is more blurry when exploring the periphery of Rage's world.
Original story: id's post-apocalyptic open-world shooter Rage (PC, PS3, 360, Mac) will look worse on Xbox 360 due to the compression needed to fit the game's assets on two DVDs, programmer John Carmack revealed at tonight's QuakeCon keynote.
According to Carmack, the royalty fees to include a third disc in the Xbox 360 version would be so high that it simply isn't a feasible solution, with the programmer hoping for Microsoft to make a concession. He stressed that the issue is merely a storage problem and has nothing to do with the power of the Xbox 360 hardware, while adding that the PlayStation 3's Blu-ray format is Sony's one leg up on the competition.
Carmack also noted his belief that neither Doom 4 or Rage will be digitally distributed online, as id isn't looking into that sort of distribution for its major titles at this point.
During last year's QuakeCon talk, Carmack stated that the PlayStation 3 edition of Rage would ship on a single Blu-ray disc, with the PC and Mac versions likely to arrive in both Blu-ray and DVD form.
Kinect for Xbox One coming to PC
Xbox One does not provide any built-in DVR capabilities
Xbox One increases friends lists to 1,000
Xbox One achievements dynamic, not limited to single games










Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 16 replies.
TBH, when this is the only game so far where it's made much difference, and we don't even know how much difference it will make yet, I don't think it's time to draw any conclusions. Either way, it's swings & roundabouts. Some games look slightly better on one platform or the other but if the difference is slight then nobody really cares. (e.g. GTA4 rendered at a lower resolution on the PS3 but as it still looked great and most people didn't notice.)
Saying MS should go back in time and fuck-up their console launch & pricing by including BR or HDDVD for one game that's going to come out 3+ years after the console's launch is fucking madness. Expecting MS to alienate people and further divide the market/SKUs by allowing games on BR at this stage also seems like madness to me. Hoping, instead, that MS relax the rules about royalties for multiple discs seems like a much more sensible route. I think MS would be stupid not to do that with this title, unless the quality difference turns out to be very small.
You must be logged in to post.