NY Governor Pursues Violent Game Legislation
by Chris Faylor, Apr 20, 2007 12:14pm PDTHot on the heels of Louisiana taxpayers shelling out $91K due to an unconstitutional limitation of video game sales, New York governor Eliot Spitzer (D) seeks to ban retailers from renting or selling violent video games to minors. Spitzer first mentioned the policy during his 2006 campaign for office and plans to elaborate upon it in a speech to be delivered today. "It is now pretty well established that certain types of videos and images have an effect on behavior," said Spitzer, who noted his intention to target violent and degrading games. Under the plan, retailers would face fines if they sold or rented such games to minors. The most important aspect of the proposal, the criteria for what constitutes a violent video game, remains unknown. Past efforts to ban the sales of violent video games to minors have been deemed unconstitutional due to their overly broad definitions of unsuitable material. For example, any game that "the average person...would find...appeals to the minor's morbid interest in violence" or "lacks serious literacy, artistic, political or scientific value for minors" was considered inappropriate under a repealed Louisiana state law, with bills in Utah and Oklahoma sharing similar language. Should Spitzer's policy rely on a more empirical set of guidelines, such as the Entertainment Software Rating Board labels displayed on the front of every video game, it could fare better than previous legislation.
Class of Heroes 2 coming to PSN on June 4
Shelter gameplay trailer is delightful, horrifying
Alan Wake Humble Bundle launches
Battlefield 4 producer says single-player should feel 'autonomous'
Indie dev to Microsoft: Be more like Sony on self-publishing



Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 11 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Children should NOT have access to games like Doom or STALKER etc.... but it should be the parents who bare the responsibility to keep it out of their hands... not the government.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Would you make a similar argument that guns or drugs shouldn't be banned at schools, as kids will bring them anyway? Would you make the argument that public buildings shouldn't have security, since a dedicated person could get in if they really wanted to? Are we going to apply the same logic to say that we shouldn't even bother making murder a crime, because look at all the people getting killed each day?
We should discuss the issue, not hand-wave it aside. Saying that people dodge the rules and laws is a sidestepping tactic that never addresses the issue of whether said rules and laws are an effective deterrent and reduce the dangerous activity. The argument can be applied just as effectively to anything that saves people but isn't 100% effective.
And in this case, it doesn't approach the real issue: no other medium suffers these restrictions and no valid case has been made to suggest that video games are unique in their effects.
Please, let's discuss whether the law is effective, beneficial, and equal, not whether it's some sort of magic societal band-aid.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
It is also pretty well established that playing aggressive sports can have an effect on one persons behavior...so I fail to see the point in this.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
You must be logged in to post.