Opinion: Will Fallout 4 Measure Up to The Witcher 3?

The Witcher 3 set a new standard for open-world role-playing games, but could it have spoiled things for games due out this fall like Fallout 3? We dicuss the merits of both series and to see if we've been spoiled by hours of monster hunting.

13

With its vast open world, nonstop action, and dark storyline, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt seems to set an all new standard for open world role-playing games. In fact, perhaps the developers (CD Projekt Red) did too good of a job creating a deeply engrossing game the likes of which haven't been seen since Skyrim released in 2011. It's only fitting that a game like Fallout 4 should be announced, which threatens to steal the "most expansive role-playing game" title back for Bethesda. But can it, or any other RPG expected to release this fall, measure up to The Witcher 3?

This fall is going to be a very exciting time for RPG fans. Not only does the first extensive DLC add-on for the Witcher 3, Hearts of Stone, promise to add another 10 hours to the epic sized game, but there will be other games that take us to fantastic worlds. Fallout 4 will probably be the Witcher 3's greatest competition, but less open world games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided will be releasing around the same time. That's not even counting action-oriented games like Assassin's Creed Syndicate and Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain. All these competing games have been in development for years, but now their releases have a big Witcher shaped shadow hovering over them. It could turn out that The Witcher 3 spoiled many role-playing fans so that they expect a lot more from their open world games, ranging from graphics to gameplay.

Decisions

Choices have always been one of the cornerstones of the role-playing experience, and that certainly won't change this fall. Fallout 4 should have multiple solutions to just about every problem, while letting players be as benevolent or ruthless as they like.

The depth of player decisions will surely set these two games apart. NPCs generally dislike or feel uneasy toward Witchers, so really any decision that doesn't result in the whole town being killed can only improve Geralt's reputation. Some decisions will impact how his story turns out, like doing a favor for a local lord, while others seem to do little more than impact how much money ends up in his pocket. Even instances where Geralt happens upon a horrific incident, like men burning a woman inside a house alive, is only impactful to a limited extent. Also, in many cases, the only way to deal with these sorts of conflict is through killing. Although Geralt does occasionally dole out advice, he's generally not much of a talker.

So, it might not be too difficult for games to match, or even surpass The Witcher 3 when it comes to decision making. Using Fallout 3 as a measure for the kinds of things one can expect from the sequel, you could blow up the friendly town of Megaton, because some wealthy guy thinks the place is an eyesore. Furthermore, if you did the research quest for Moira to figure out how best survive radiation, she survives the blast as a Ghoul. That's on top of all the things you can do to or for the Megaton residents before you decide to blow the place up. Your Charisma, Speech, and Karma, along with other skills allow for different ways of handling people.

What games like Fallout 4 will have that The Witcher 3 doesn't is one of the most critical decisions of all: The main character. Although you can modify Geralt's fighting style so that he excels and certain skills, in the end, he's still a Witcher and has to stick to whatever path the narrative sets before him. With Fallout, players are free to take the character in whatever direction they want. They can be as strong or smart as they want to be, provided they have enough points.

Story and Combat

We have a case of Retro-Future vs Fantasy here. The highly imaginative settings for these games each have a strong following, and the chance to explore places like a blasted out Boston may be more than enough to overcome criticisms over Fallout 4's supposed graphics quality. When it comes to graphics, it could come down to how much you prefer green forests full of dragons and werewolves compared to the blasted Wasteland populated by cannibalistic raiders and giant sized insects. Actually, The Witcher 3 has some supersized bugs too, so that might not be an issue.

There's also the matter of humor. The charm of the Fallout games comes from the fact that it's kind of preposterous. Everyone is stuck in a 1950s aesthetic and mentality, despite it being the latter half of the 21st century, where robots still roam the streets. There are sarcastic ghouls and people in metal power suits that might join you in your adventure. Cybernetic dog companions are not unexpected, nor are portable nuclear warhead launchers. It's an amazing world, full of crazy possibilities. We don't yet know what the Fallout 4's story will involve, but both Fallout 3 and New Vegas indicate that we're in for crazy ride.

On the other hand, there's a lot to be said for the dark and mature world of The Witcher, where there's plenty of sex and violence. Compared to its themes, Fallout seems like a kid's game. Plus, Geralt is a monster hunter, and part of the game's challenge is figuring out and procuring the means to best defeat these creatures. Werewolves and ghosts may eventually become old hat, but they're powerful enough to put up a good fight. Plus, the Witcher does pull out a number or surprises, like the Botchling quest.

As far as fighting the beasties that populate these worlds, the two games couldn't be further part. Fallout 4 will undoubtedly be a first-person shooter with an over-the-should camera option, while The Witcher 3 uses third-person hack'n'slash action. Another fundamental difference is how Fallout will use the VATS (Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System), a system that allows player to queue up multiple commands and specific body parts, to supplement the straight shooting action. Both are satisfying in their own way, but Fallout is the only game that has a mysterious stranger that comes from out of nowhere to help you kill something.

Wastelands or Witchers?

Perhaps I've been looking at things the wrong way. Although The Witcher and Fallout have some things in common, like how ingesting too much of something can lead to lethal toxicity levels, and how equipment has a tendency to quickly break down, they're very different experiences. New Vegas even has its own card game. Ultimately, both games should be the best they can be in their respective series. But at the same time, we should note that The Witcher 3 is as good because it learned from games like Skyrim and sought the huge open world.

Whether or not Fallout 4 succeeds will depend strictly on its own merits, and whether or not players will prefer to wander the Wastelands or the Woodlands, when the Heart of Stone expansion releases. But whether you decide to pursue werewolves or Deathclaws, a world of possibilities will undoubtedly awaits.

Managing Editor
From The Chatty
  • reply
    June 5, 2015 3:20 PM

    Steven Wong posted a new article, Opinion: Will Fallout 4 Measure Up to The Witcher 3?

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 3:24 PM

      really depends on how many chicks you can bang

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 3:29 PM

      based on what i hear about the witcher 3 so far... it will be a very tall order.

      • reply
        June 5, 2015 3:32 PM

        I think Fallout will probably scratch the exploration itch better. Witcher 3 is greatl but there isn't much drive to search every corner for loot.

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 3:47 PM

      Opinion: Why Is This Phrased as a Question When We're Supposed to Offer an Opinion

      Opinion: Will Our Next Silly Article Generate More Clicks?

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 3:54 PM

      Nitpick: Fallout NV was set in 2281. So, latter half of the 23rd century.

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 3:55 PM

      This post needs so much editing-

      "In fact, perhaps the developers (CD Projekt Red) did too good of a job creating a deeply engrossing game the likes of which haven't been seen since Skyrim released in 2011."

      Is that really a "fact"? How did they do too good of a job?

      • reply
        June 5, 2015 4:00 PM

        I found it especially funny when he said Fallout was a "kids game" when compared to The Witcher. I guess because it doesn't show sex? Nuclear war, cannibalistic raiders at every turn, horrific social experiments (see the Vaults), gratuitous violence at every turn...but yeah, it's a "kids game".

        Then again, I was 13 when I played the original Fallout in 1997, so maybe he has a point...

        • reply
          June 5, 2015 4:03 PM

          "But whether you decide to pursue werewolves or Deathclaws, a world of possibilities will undoubtedly awaits."

          It certainly will undoubtedly awaits!

        • reply
          June 5, 2015 5:11 PM

          Naw....just comes off as a lengthy and wordy nergasm.

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 4:09 PM

      der_Witcha 3 0wns...it will be tough, Steven Wong.

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 5:09 PM

      Kind of an odd comparison. Two different universes, settings, etc.

      Not a fan of articles like these really.

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 7:34 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 7:37 PM

      Yes. Because fuq the witcher

    • reply
      June 5, 2015 11:35 PM

      Different beasts in my opinion. The Witcher 3 is nothing short of amazing, but Fallout is fantastic in its own way.

    • reply
      June 6, 2015 2:33 AM

      sure. By being different. Witcher 3 was the conclusion to a story I've waited a long time for and I enjoyed every bit of seeing it through, but I doubt I'll ever play it again from the start. Fallout lends itself to doing that, and playing as something or someone completely different.

      That said I'll preemptively reject the ridiculous notion that one can't compare them: for me Witcher >> Fallout (based on previous Fallouts of course). If I have to grind levels it better be in service to an engrossing story with characters I care about. Other people will either love leveling or doing so while making their own character and will perhaps prefer Fallout. Personal preference how it falls out (OBVIOUSLY) but they can be compared. For the record I'd rather eat an orange

    • reply
      June 6, 2015 1:17 PM

      I don't think Fallout 4 has to measure up to the Witcher 3. All it has to do is be true to the theme and the rest will fall in to place.

    • reply
      June 8, 2015 6:49 AM

      Fallout is its own game, however, Witcher 3 set all kinds of standards this is true.
      This being said aside from the graphical fidelity which clearly Fallout is in the ass department. We should wait and see what the story-line and side quests and the feature lists are going to be like. That's whats going to define this entry. Its already lost in the graphical department to just about every game released in 2015 and possibly 2014. Hell, Arcadia, Bound by Fire and Shadow Warrior look better than this multi-million dollar triple A game. This better be the best , most engrossing story I ever played in all my 37 years of playing games.
      I'm done with giving free passes, just cause I got tingling in my nut sack of nostalgia. You got the millions, put it in your game.

Hello, Meet Lola