Nintendo ordered to pay $15 million in 3DS patent suit

Nintendo lost a 3DS patent suit in March and was ordered to pay $30.2 million in damages, but a judge yesterday called that amount "intrinsically excessive" and halved the amount.

2

After losing a recent patent lawsuit regarding glasses-free 3D utilized in the 3DS, a judge has ordered Nintendo to pay $15.1 million in damages to former Sony employee Seijiro Tomita.

Nintendo still claims that none of its products infringe upon the patent and that it will continue to appeal. However, the plaintiff must decide if he will accept the amount. Originally awarded $30 million, Judge Rakoff called the amount "intrinsically excessive" and halved the award.

Reuters reports that Judge Rakoff called the amount unsupported by the evidence presented at trial." According to the ruling, the 3DS itself is not profitable, and most games don't use any technology covered by Tomita's 3D patent.

Rakoff gave Tomita until August 23 to decide if he will accept $15.1 million instead. If he refuses, he'll have to proceed with an entirely new damages trial, and risk getting nothing at all. That's good news for Nintendo, but Rakoff also denied Nintendo's requests to overturn the jury's verdict or grant a new trial.

Joe Diamante, Tomita's lawyer, said, "We are still reviewing the decision and have no comment."

Editor-In-Chief
Filed Under
From The Chatty
  • reply
    August 15, 2013 5:30 PM

    Steve Watts posted a new article, Nintendo ordered to pay $15 million in 3DS patent suit.

    Nintendo lost a 3DS patent suit in March and was ordered to pay $30.2 million in damages, but a judge yesterday called that amount "intrinsically excessive" and halved the amount.

    • reply
      August 15, 2013 8:27 PM

      Millionaires suing millionaires and in the process hogging up the judicial system. Sigh.

    • reply
      August 16, 2013 4:08 AM

      this made much more sense after reading
      "Nintendo lost a 3DS patent suit in March and was ordered to pay $30.2 million in damages, but a judge yesterday called that amount "intrinsically excessive" and halved the amount."

    • reply
      August 16, 2013 5:04 AM

      Umm... I feel like the first half of this story was cut off. The judge here is Jed Rakoff, and the initial ruling was $30.2M, but he cut it in half.

Hello, Meet Lola