Evening Reading

So at first I thought nothing of it.. but just a couple of days ago I decided to stop overclocking my home computer. Then I realized it's because I'm old. :(

- Google controls your destiny and likes to party
- New and improved Light Ultra!
- Dead body controversy
- Supercomputer's key to the brain
- VoIP getting hotter
- Dude, sniff your TV

Lastly, yes.. like Maarten said 40yr old virgin is indeed amusing. I found myself chuckling much more than I expected. Once in a while there was a giggle too. Mostly chuckling though. Teehee!

Steve Gibson is the cofounder of Shacknews.com. Originally known as sCary's Quakeholio back in 1996, Steve is now President of Gearbox Publishing after selling Shacknews to GameFly in 2009.

Filed Under
From The Chatty
  • reply
    August 20, 2005 6:01 PM

    Light that travels faster than the speed of light
    mind -> blown

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:05 PM

      They do it using some weird quantum-thingie that doesn't actually propagate information faster than the speed of light. Weird, huh?

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:05 PM

      The speed of light is ONLY constant in a vacccum. Speeding it up and slowing it down isn't very hard and I doubt they were actually able to speed it up past the vaccum constant.

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 6:09 PM

        They were also able to create extreme conditions in which the light signal travelled faster than 300 million meters a second

        • reply
          August 20, 2005 6:23 PM

          For some reason this disturbs me.

          • reply
            August 20, 2005 6:48 PM

            yeah... how can something be faster then itself? from what I heard, I take it light is a wave. how and why, seeing that the light source is probably not rocking back and forth in most cases, I don't know, neither what it (energy) is "made of", but who cares... anyway we have this wave there, right? and then this wave enters a different medium, like, from air into glass and back out, and it moves slower while inside the glass. soo... is there a lot of excess light in the glass, like, saved, buffered for a moment? then what if you insert a glass block into an existing beam of light... will the spot on the wall disappear momentarily while the light crawls through the glass?
            I'm actually even more confused by radio waves... say you're flying in a straight line away from the other person while you two are talking over a walkie talkie... what happens to the radio waves? isn't the received information slowed down because every "unit" (great word to use in an analogous system) of the wave is sent from further away than the previous one and hence takes longer to reach the other radio? so you'd talk in slow-mo when you're flaying away really fast? is your wireless internet connection slower when you're in the concorde? let's not even get me started on the subject of flying towards something...

            • reply
              August 20, 2005 7:58 PM

              What you're describing is an effect known as red shift. It's analogous to the Doppler effect you get with sound. For example, when a train is approaching you, it sounds really low, but as it gets closer, the frequency gets higher and higher until it passes you, and then recedes again. The frequencies of sound actually do what you're describing.

              The same thing happens with light, except with light instead of sound. So things receding away from you are "shifted" towards longer frequencies, and things coming toward you are shifted towards shorter frequencies. This is known as "red shift" and "blue shift," respectively, because the frequncies of light go toward the red or blue side of the spectrum.

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:11 PM

      yeah i also like how they slowed it down to the speed of a bike.

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:11 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:26 PM

      So, we can expect Microsoft to patent this soon...?

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:39 PM

      It's most likely the precursor wave, which makes this old news, and it doesn't violate any known laws, though the implications of these experiments are still being studied and debated. Details in this article are curiously absent, but they do say that "only a portion of the signal is affected." That makes me think precursor.

      Read here for more info on the precursor wave in an older experiment.
      http://www.spie.org/app/Publications/magazines/oerarchive/july/jul00/lightlimit.html

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:39 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 6:50 PM

        Phase velocity is not the velocity of a phsical entity, it is a sort of virtual velocity, and it's not a big deal at all. I doubt anyone would make such a fuss over phase velocity. It's difficult to tell from the article though, due to the lack of detail, and that in itself raises a red flag.

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 6:52 PM

      but only downhill.

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 7:07 PM

      okay let me bust out some spacetime shit on your asses. Here's the deal: everything goes the speed of light. Einstein never wanted to call it theory of relativity someone else made that name up. Einstein wanted to call it Theory of Invariance. The invariance is EVERYTHING goes the speed of light through SpaceTime. So you have space x,y,z and you have time t. For light it never ages because it puts all its motion into space and 0 into time. For most other things they go through both time and space. This is why a person going really fast in a rocketship doesn't age as fast as someone on earth. He puts more motion into space than into time.

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 7:43 PM

        does this post baffle anyone else?

        • reply
          August 20, 2005 7:51 PM

          if you're all space and no time, you age zero. if you're all time and no space, you're an old fart. case closed.

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 7:51 PM

        Haha, I know exactly what you are saying (read it in The Elegant Universe (great book btw)), but as you wrote it, it makes zero sense :)

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 7:51 PM

        everything does not go the speed of light. if that were true time would stop

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 7:12 PM

      ah so this is how we have immediate communications with spaceships that are millions of light years away in the future. Sweet!

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 7:13 PM

      also, let me ask the relevant question here - will this decrease my ping time to my favorite server?

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 7:21 PM

        this is what counts, anyone have an answer?

        • reply
          August 20, 2005 7:33 PM

          Only if you are operating a fibreoptic NIC card in your computer, have fibre optic interconnects, and have a circuit board with 0 resistance.

      • reply
        August 20, 2005 7:35 PM

        No.

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 7:47 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      August 20, 2005 8:15 PM

      its not true - read the first highly modded comment on slashdot about the story for an explaination far more eloquent that i could say. It essence, its 'faked'.

Hello, Meet Lola