• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Napster Users = Consumers

by Steve Gibson, Jul 21, 2000 7:06am PDT
Related Topics – MPAA

We havent beaten the Napster dead horse for a little while have we? Well I'll be brief. This new study looks to confirm what many young Napster users have been screaming for a while. Napster users buy more music than most anyone.

Jupiter said it surveyed more than 2,200 online music fans about whether the money they spent on music purchases had increased, decreased or remained the same [snip] All (ed: except one which remained the same) groups said they had increased spending as a result of online music use, Jupiter reported
My concern though is of course students are going to say they buy more music. I dont have a better idea though.. so there. :) While we're on that topic, not to be left out in the cold the guys at Scour.com have been slapped with a lawsuit by the MPAA. Basically the same situation as Napster but the Movie industry. Thanks [Venger].




Comments

55 Threads | 102 Comments












  • i tend to agree w/ this survey (even tho online surveys tend to sux0r)...i my self have bought sooo many damn cd's cause of napster that i cant even begin to count....its because of napster that now i listen to such a huge range of music now, as opposed to before when i wouldn't even think of anything that wasn't of the likes of pantera, old metallica, corrosion of conformity, etc etc....basically napster has significantly broadened my musical tastes and in my cd collection now you'd find anything from beethoven to pantera to stevie ray vaughan to skynyrd to van morrison to b.b. king to cypress hill to the beatles, etc etc....its just all over the place, and its all because napster has givin me the ability to check out differnt genres and artists i would have normaly never considering listening too. With napster i can sit down and say, "yknow, why dont i check out some Stevie Ray Vaughan and see what that's all about" so id download it, listen to it, and itd turn out that id like it a lot, so next thing you know, not only am i buying stevie ray vaughan cd's, im getting into all sorts of other blues artists...and before this i didnt even listen to blues! do you think anyone would ever go into a cd store and do that? just buy cds randomly to see if they like it? hell no! i realize that not everyone is like this and there are those that just download mp3s and burn em to cd without ever even considering buying the cds, but you're gonna have people like that in whatever you do...the mp3 craze existed long before napster, and warez have been around since god-knows-when, and there's no quick-and-easy l33t warez trading program out there either (irc doesnt count :p), so either way, napster or not, you are still gonna have people abuse the system in whatever you do, which is inevitable, but there is nonetheless a lot of legitamte and positive uses for napster regarless of the abuses of it....and sure, you could argue that i downloaded those mp3's illegaly, and sure i havent bought the cd to every mp3 ive downloaded, but a huge chuck of those that i have downloaded have turned into cd sales that i would have never before thought twice about buying

    -ninja
























  • Ok, so let's go with this argument: Napster users steal music, plain and simple. Might be right, might be wrong, but that's what we're assuming.

    In any case, let's also assume that the common-sense laws of economics apply: if the price of purchasing a legitimate song is less than that of warezing a song, more people will buy their music. In this case, the music industry is clearly fux0red -- their control over the release of traditional media has allowed them to charge a high premium for the music.

    Also, their current claims about one's rights to copy / share music once a person has purchase said music are equally outdated -- if I buy the music, I should be able to copy and share with whomever I want. If my friends all have T-1, then obviously it's going to be quite easy to share. But if some of them only have modems and like the music, they may be more inclined to buy the physical CD instead.

    Either way you go, you have to admit that regardless of whether or not Napster is right or wrong, they've opened up Pandora's Box. The music industry no longer has control over the distribution of their media, and their pricing model is certainly not efficient enough to allow them to take full advantage of the Internet. If Napster is shut down, some other app fill its shoes..... I like to call it the "FTM Syndrome".

  • Damnit. I'm sick and tired of hearing about Napster. The RIAA is an evil empire. Ask any artist that's fresh to the market, trying to survive when they can't even get any airplay, thanks to the heavy hitters in the industry. If you don't suck the RIAA's cock, you don't get your music played on air. Simple as that. They've been screwing the consumer with outrageous prices on CDs that cost less than a few dollars to produce, and they turn around and screw the people that create the music by giving them 5%, sometimes less of the initial album sales. So, stop sympathizing with the RIAA. They've got their stranglehold, they have no realistic worries from the mp3 people. I don't use Napster too often out of choice. I use Scour all the time, however. Sure, maybe downloading album after album is wrong. I've done it before. But in most cases, I'll download a couple songs from an album that don't get played on the radio, listen to them, and if I like them, I'll buy the album. Why? Because I refuse to spend $15-20 on a CD when there's only 1 or 2 songs I like on it. If I like 3 or 4 songs, I can possibly justify buying it. It's not that I'm broke by any means. I live comfortably enough, and I could afford to buy every album that I download mp3's from. Stealing? Maybe. But the system's been stealing from us for the last 20-30 years.