Leaked Modern Warfare 2 Footage Reveals Controversial Terrorist Sequence (Updated)
by Chris Faylor, Oct 28, 2009 8:59am PDTUpdate 2: Activision has released an official comment on the video, saying that the footage is "not representative of the overall gameplay experience in Modern Warfare 2." More below.
Update: The video has been removed at the request of publisher Activision, citing copyright infringement. The rest of the story, however, remains unchanged.
Though Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 isn't due out until November 10, someone out there managed to get their hands on an extremely early copy of the game. And as we live in the digital age, this means off-screen shaky cam footage of in-game antics.
The footage can be found below, along with a statement from publisher Activision. Be forewarned that the video is of low quality and spoils what is easily among the game's most surprising and controversial moments, as does the statement.
Preemptively addressing the controversy bound to emerge from a sequence in which players control a terrorist gunning down innocent civilians, Activision told VG247:
The scene establishes the depth of evil and the cold bloodedness of a rogue Russian villain and his unit. By establishing that evil, it adds to the urgency of the player's mission to stop them.Players have the option of skipping over the scene. At the beginning of the game, there are two 'checkpoints' where the player is advised that some people may find an upcoming segment disturbing. These checkpoints can't be disabled.
Modern Warfare 2 is a fantasy action game designed for intense, realistic game play that mirrors real life conflicts, much like epic, action movies. It is appropriately rated 18 for violent scenes, which means it is intended for those who are 18 and older.
It's far from the first time that the sequel has ignited controversy. A recent trailer for the game showed Washington D.C. in ruins, with the decision to axe dedicated server support from the PC edition drawing a vocal response from fans of the series.
Update 2 (Cont'd): Activision has released this statement to the press:
The leaked footage was taken from a copy of game that was obtained illegally and is not representative of the overall gameplay experience in Modern Warfare 2.
Infinity Ward's Modern Warfare 2 features a deep and gripping storyline in which players face off against a terrorist threat dedicated to bringing the world to the brink of collapse. The game includes a plot involving a mission carried out by a Russian villain who wants to trigger a global war. In order to defeat him, the player infiltrates his inner circle. The scene is designed to evoke the atrocities of terrorism.
At the beginning of the game, players encounter a mandatory "checkpoint" in which they are warned that an upcoming segment may contain disturbing elements and they can choose not to engage in the gameplay that involves this scene. Consistent with its content, the game has been given an "M" for Mature by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board. The rating is prominently displayed on the front and back of the packaging, as well as in all advertising.
Splinter Cell Blacklist co-op modes partially detailed
FIFA 14 on PC won't use Ignite engine
Ace Attorney Trilogy coming to iOS next week
Far Cry 3 editor jazzed up with Blood Dragon shinies
Epic Mickey 2 for Vita coming June 18











Comments
Seriously, just saying "They don't have to play that bit" wont cut it, and if it DOES work with Australia's OFLC and the game manages a MA15 classification I officially give up.
If the OFLC has any integrity, this game cant possibly be released in Australia. What do you all think, especially AU Shackers please.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
its only a game and all this hype is just a piss take. no one complained about die hard 2 gameplay when you could do the exact same thing and kill innocent people in a airport :)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
To portray the urgency they wanted, I think it would have been better to play as a civilian, trying to run away and survive. Well, that would be some new gameplay mechanic - but apparently MW is all and exclusively about shooting stuff, yah!
I also find it interesting that the guy is so clearly visible in the tv's reflection.
If your were being briefed on a terrorist activity it would be one thing but it sure hell looks like your playing as them.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 58 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Apparently most people here that call themselves gamers believe in over-cencorship.
It's fucking sad really, No one complained when Fallout 3 images were used by a terrorist group.
No one complained about all the ENDLESS WAR games being against Germans or Russians did they?
Yet suddenly people bring their ethics into the entertainment world.
They watch films that depict people being cut up, stabbed, shot, torn to pieces by all sorts of things yet soon as it's a game it's a bad thing?!
To hell with all these sad acts that want everything to fit into their "Ethics" profile.
Well I guess I have no ethics because I'm fine with it...Although oddly enough I wouldn't walk into a school and shoot the place up...I am fine with the idea of a child dying in a game....
Because it's a powerful image that'd effect people and get some sort of storyplay going AKA Max Payne?
Gamers are too stuck up nowdays...I miss the days when gamers were social outcasts...The days when games were made for gamers and everyone hated us lol
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
At least Shacknews have a sensible headline unlike theage.com.au which is so full of shit... "Outrage as terrorist game lets players massacre civilians"
I don't care how good IW are there is no way it looks so real that it actually is and FFS you are using a plastic controller or keyboard and mouse, playing paintball is more involved then that shit and you actually shoot at real people.
It's refreshing in a way. That sounds horrible, but this stuff does happen, and most people would never know, or care to know.
It is different than watching it happen on screen, and everyone one of you knows that, but that's the point. Evil, in the strictly sociopathic incapability to empathise, does exist. Or worse is the narsasistic disregard for life to serve your ends. Both can and do commit these horrors..
Am I the only one who has a hard time doing the evil things in choice driven games? I mean I am the biggest douchebag I know, but.... this seems related to how I look at this footage
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
The thing is, while I find this a little disturbing (so much for gamers being desensitized to violence, real or fictional), I really do understand what they're doing here. I expect most of the media, video game critics, activists, etc really won't understand this and end up sensationalizing it. The intent of games has always been misconstrued by people who can not comprehend their nature, and I expect that this will be no different.
This is the exact same reason why they pulled the plug on the Iraq War game. A bunch of old people who are fundamentally out of touch with pop culture looked at it and immediately decided "hey, it's portraying something, so therefor it must be advocating it." No one but gamers understands that games are an art form, as as such it is possible for them to portray a situation without taking a moral stance on it.
Thank god, jack thompson got shut down, but if he didn't, I can already see it "this game advocates terrorists killing innocent people zomg!" Ever since the earliest bank robber movies in black in black and white, the evil of evil people has been portrayed simply because it tells you about them and lets you form an opinion about them (thus pulling you in.) How many movies have shown evil people torturing other people, robbing places, etc?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
I wonder how much controversy it will cause if it gets in the news though? It could easily cause more furore than the GTA games, with people saying it is a murder simulator and terrorism simulator and is encouraging people to go postal. There's bound to be someone frothing at the mouth over it. Pretty shocked a company like Activision is allowing something like this to be published.
As for whether they should have this in the game or not, I really don't think it's necessary. They could just use cutscenes or movies or photographs or any other conventional means to convey the atrocity of what the terrorists do. Seriously, I don't need that much motivation to kill bad guys in video games, and I'm already extremely anti-terrorist, so what is the point of this level except for sensationalism? I really don't think it is justifiable in terms of serving the story or gameplay. We all hate terrorists already.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 46 replies.
If there was a nickel for every time some bad guy in a movie killed a good guy, someone, somewhere would be very rich. Why or how video games are any different is beyond me. Just because you can interact with it, doesn't mean it's not the exact same thing as a movie. This is about as controversial as a reportedly 'gay purple teletubbie' to me.
Call of Duty: World at War had a part where you were ordered to kill unarmed P.O.W.'s, and I certainly don't remember hearing anything about that. What's the difference here?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
In other words...more of the usual. Christian Conservatives going batshit, gamers getting lulz in return
edit> anyone think the ESRB will slap a AO rating on this?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
I think its great they are doing this, and for once giving gamers a REAL emotion out of a videogame. I think the fact that people are getting upset by it means it works. Bottom line is you dont have to do anything with this scene if you dont want to, you dont have to play the game if you dont want to, and from the sounds of that post you may even be able to skip the scene all together.
I felt a bit crazy simply watching the scene and cant imagine how id feel playing through it, but bet your ass im going to. Then afterwards ill be dying to take out ever single one of those bastards in what may be one of the most gripping and emotional videogames ever made.
I doubt ill be running through guns blazing on my first attempt because ill feel awkward as hell. Though after the shock and awe is over on my 2nd 3rd playthrough ill most likely be mowing down every civilian i possibly can just to get the seen over with and get on with the rest of the game.
(its just a game)
You see this stuff in movies ALL the time. I think its great that an interactive game can convey better emotions than a simple motion picture.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Achievement Unlocked: Checking out the check ins!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
To my knowledge we haven't yet seen a terrorist attack on a middle-eastern or eastern european target in this series, just insurgent uprisings. That I think presents a really skewed view of what is really going on over there. I mean, the game is sort of a military fantasy, but it's clearly trying to attempt to be something more with controversial with sequences like this. Maybe the full game will prove me wrong, but I sort of doubt it.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
I mean, I think it would be more fun. Games like Postal and GTA are extremely cathartic and absurd, not ultra realistic and disturbing which is what makes it so fun, but this obviously is much heavier (and I think it's a great idea to have a scene like this, it elevates gaming's status as an art form) and doesn't seem fun. Though, I think the idea of playing as a civilian could get their point across just fine, be even more memorable and intense if not frightening.
Also, God damnit, this is the mother of all spoilers and some asshole who leaked it ruined it for all of us. Just reading the headline was enough.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
I like what they're doing here. They're being controversial without being particularly brave. I mean, really? The Russians? Yeah, i remember when the Russians blew up the WTC, and Khobar Towers, the trains in Italy and Britain.... There are Chechen rebels, but they busy themselves with KILLING Russians, and they are, um, the unnamable "interest group" that Infinity Ward doesn't want to touch.
The Russians haven't done anything like this. They are, however affable badguys. Similarly, WWII shooters are probably as common as they are at least partially because nearly everyone agrees that the Germans were badguys, and so it's OK to shoot them. God Bless BF2 for having the guts to rightly or wrongly include the "unnamed interest group" and the Chinese military as possible opponents.
I guess it's safer to slander the people that won't track you down and kill you. Well played, IW, and they still get the buzz. Still, it's pathetic that Activision postures like this is some kind of crazy controversial thing. It ignores reality and skews to fantasy because real controversy with a certain group would lead to actual danger for them.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 10 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
What is it this issue that tipped it over the edge or the whole dedi server thang?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
I have no issues with them covering tricky or more mature topics - games are growing up after all. My only gripe is that this is probably just another marketing gimmick and we're all the rubes sucked in by it.
That kind of thing can happen in reality and I believe it does.
But damn. Wake up, life can be tough and cruel.
You can play this game because you feel like you are experiencing the reality or you can just play it for fun.
But for the love of God, it's a GAME.
I love running over people in GTA and I prefer playing on the Terrorist side on Counter-Strike but I don't do the same on the reality.
People need to start separating things.
You must be logged in to post.