The Chronicles of Riddick DRM Sparks Outcry

By Chris Faylor, Apr 09, 2009 10:22am PDT Reports that the PC version of The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena can only be installed three times have sparked another round of outcry from the extremely vocal PC community, though publisher Atari says these reports aren't entirely accurate.

The PC version of Starbreeze's stealthy first-person shooter does indeed have a three-machine install limit, Atari told Shacknews in a statment, but customers can acquire more activations, assuming "it's a legitimate request," by calling the Atari hotline.

"We implement this protection in an effort to avoid early piracy," explained Atari. "The [initial] activation code lets you install the game on up to 3 machines, with an unlimited number of installs on each assuming that you don't change any major hardware in your PC or re-install your operating system."

Concerns arose earlier in the month after an Atari Forums post, citing PC Gamer, claimed that the DRM was non-revocable. This led many to believe that a copy of the PC game could only ever be installed three times, with no chance of recovery after that.

In response, was flooded with negative reviews and one-star ratings for the game. One review claimed that "DRM restrictions have left this game unplayable," adding "it isn't even any good." Another was titled "3 Installs: Piracy wins again".

Machine-based activation limits are nothing new in the land of PC DRM. Far Cry 2, Spore, Burnout Paradise: The Ultimate Box, Crysis Warhead, Dead Space and many other titles have used this particular technique in an attempt to restrict piracy.

Typically, legitimate owners can either revoke past installs or call customer support for assistance if they find themselves hampered by the limit.

An enhanced remake of The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay (PC, Xbox) with an entirely new campaign and the addition of multiplayer, Dark Athena (PC, PS3, X360) launched in North America this week, and arrives in Europe on April 24.

Thanks to everyone that sent this in.

Click here to comment...


42 Threads* | 159 Comments
  • Doubtful that Atari decision makers sat around and said, "Woah we are really going to show the pirates...they have to CALL NOW!! YEAH! We stopped piracy! Company picnic with strippers!"

    This kind of DRM works to prevent a small amount of physical sharing, without going too far I might add. Like your friend borrowing the game at school then passing it on to 4 other people to load onto their PC's. A small portion of people might actually buy games from word of mouth but also might have borrowed the actual game before they would think of downloading illegally. Lets just say this is .5% of the RiddickPC sales.

    If I was running a business and knew I could increase profit by 0.5 or 1% on a product by eliminating a certain small element of software "sharing" with mild DRM, I would take the measures. Some people don't understand how much that .5% adds up to. I wouldn't put some insane starforce malware bullshit on it, but I'd try to work out something.

    Reactivation of the key after the 3rd install is only mildly annoying for this purpose. Sure doean't prevent cracking, but just for 1 second, think the people who actually run large companys have a plan you may not fully understand from behind your pile of mountain dew cans.

  • It's really sad. The publisher/devs are the ones getting fleeced by third-party DRM sellers, and it's cutting into *their* profits, and the legit consumers are the only ones affected (every DRM'd game of note the past few years has been pirated with in weeks of release if not earlier, no activation limits for the pirates) and they are the ones footing the bill at the end of the day. The "early piracy" argument is even more pointless than issue as a whole, their DRM will be cracked, and people who were never going to buy it in the first place are still going to be able to play it.

    This is exactly like Mass Effect all over again for me, I was looking forward to the PC release of that for so long, but ended up not buying it due to the DRM, I waited for it to hit steam. I can wait for this to have a patch/tool released before I buy it as well, though this is also something I've been really really looking forward for a long time. Steams has found a good balance of DRM I and most people can live with, I'll buy it in a heartbeat if it's put on there without the additional activation limit.

    It's the poinlessness of it that bothers me the most; It's going to be cracked, widely distributed and enjoyed by pirates long before legitimate (in terms of actually wanting to pay for it) fans get around to buying it, and by that point it'll be discounted and dev will make even less, and that's on top of what they're paying the DRM supplier. I'm almost tempted to buy it on PS3 instead, but then that's another datapoint in the "PC gaming isn't profitable" reports. Only one being screwed by this is the dev themselves. :(

    What are PC gaming fans supposed to do? If we don't buy it we're over-reacting paranoid faggots and might be screwing the devs, if we do buy it as-is we're letting them know they can get away with pointless DRM, if we pirate it we're legitimizing their need for the DRM and other scare tactics in the first place :(