Take-Two Hit With $50M Lawsuit From Former Executive
by Blake Ellison, Oct 15, 2008 1:55pm PDTRobert Alexander, a former board member of publisher Take-Two, has sued the company for $50 million, alleging that Take-Two reneged on an oral contract with Alexander.
It's a complicated story dating back to the 1990s, but GamePolitics sums it up well:
In his suit Alexander claims that he has been in the game biz since he was 16. He says that he built up a distribution company called Jack of All Games which he sold it to Take-Two in 1998. After closing that deal he spent some time as a member of the T2 Board of Directors, leaving in 1999.
In 2003 Alexander formed a new distribution company, Game Ballers, and began negotiating with Ryan Brant and other execs to partner with T2 and Jack of All Games. Although Alexander began working with T2, his deal was never finalized before legal troubles forced Brant to leave the company in March, 2004. When Eibeler assumed the CEO post later in the year, Alexander apparently fell out of favor and alleges that he was not paid what he was owed.
"What he was owed" was staggering: a $240,000 salary with guaranteed 20% raises for three years, a $25,000 monthly expense allowance, a $0.50 royalty on each game passed through his distribution chain, and a large chunk of Take-Two stock.
Take-Two, under new management, refused to comment to GamePolitics on the suit.
Blake's Take: Game distributors are the middlemen between publishers and retailers. That an executive in charge of distribution--getting games from point A to point B--can claim that kind of compensation is mind-boggling.
Binary Domain demo available this week
Shack PSA: Angry Birds on Facebook today
Resistance: Burning Skies dawns on Vita in May
Shack PSA: Mass Effect 3 demo out today
Daily Filter: The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings Enhanced Edition, MLB 12: The Show
Comments
http://gothamist.com/2008/07/28/cop_caught_on_video_assaulting_cycl.php
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
1) why wasn't a written contract produced within weeks or months?
2) why did it take him 4 years to file suit?
3) were their clauses to the oral contract that he's leaving out that might otherwise nullify the agreement based on future events?
Looks like it's going to depend on what the witnesses say since he claims the entire board voted unanimously in favor of the terms of the oral agreement.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Welcome to America, get rich quick by suing everyone and anyone!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.