StarCraft 2 Now A Trilogy, Three Campaigns to Be Split Into Separate Games

Nick Breckon

October 10, 2008 3:40 PM

Nick Breckon

Filed Under

From The Chatty

Refresh Go To Thread

skitzo

 reply
October 10, 2008 3:44 PM

I don't want to spend $150 on a fucking game, this is bullshit.
- AllYourBase
  
   reply
  October 10, 2008 3:47 PM
  
  would you feel differently if they had just announced they were planning 2 expansion packs for it?
  - skitzo
    
     reply
    October 10, 2008 3:51 PM
    
    Yes, since expansion packs are generally 30 bucks, a total of $110, you still save 40 bucks, get more units and new content and they are generally released a six months to a year after the initial game is released which keeps general interest in the game.
    - DewFuel
      
       reply
      October 10, 2008 3:57 PM
      
      40 dollars over the course of 5 years... and they never said they wouldn't release new units?
      - skitzo
        
         reply
        October 10, 2008 3:58 PM
        
        Why would they release new terran units with a zerg only campaign? That makes no sense.
        
        DewFuel
        
         reply
        October 10, 2008 4:10 PM
        
        they've mentioned they want to keep the multiplayer and single player experience separate. they could introduce new units in MP while keeping SP consistent with lore.
  - NastyJack
    
     reply
    October 10, 2008 3:53 PM
    
    Obviously that depends on how they were priced.
    
    I hope if they are going to require fans to buy all three that they reduce the price a bit on all three. This doesn't sound like a typical expansion pack scenario though.
- Sailor of Fortune
  
   reply
  October 10, 2008 3:55 PM
  
  What if it's $40 for each, or less!
  
  Hahaha, Saying that would probably get you fired at blizzard.