Microsoft Fires Xbox 360 Red Ring of Death Whistleblower, May File Lawsuit
by Blake Ellison, Sep 12, 2008 4:13pm PDTMicrosoft has faced a great deal of criticism over the widely reported instability of its Xbox 360 console. Now, it's fighting back by firing an employee who contributed to an expose' uncovering the system's predilection for the "Red Ring of Death"--an error code on the Xbox 360's LED-lighted power button signaling that the console is inoperable.
Robert Delaware, a temporary worker for a game testing firm contracted to Microsoft, was fired by his supervising manager at Microsoft for talking without permission to VentureBeat, who broke the story on the system's problems.
Delaware was one of several who spoke to article author Dean Takahashi, but he was the only one not to do so on the condition of anonymity. "He fully knew the risk he was taking, based on multiple conversations I had with him about using his name," claimed Takahashi in a follow-up story today. At present, all references to Robert Delaware have been removed from the original VentureBeat story.
"Clearly, from a legalistic point of view, Delaware broke company policy and it is the company's right to fire him," wrote Takahashi in today's follow-up. In fact, Delaware "expects to face civil charges from his former employer ... and Microsoft as well."
"I don't regret it," said Delaware to Takahashi in a phone call after being fired. "I'll fight it. If they want to come after me, bring it on."
Takahashi, a known insider on the topic of Microsoft hardware, is disappointed by the firing. "When I was thinking about making a difference with our story, this isn't what I had in mind," he wrote.
Daily Filter: Mass Effect 3, Alan Wake's American Nightmare
Blizzard files opposition to Valve's Dota trademark
Twisted Metal promotion blows up Sweet Tooth's truck
Demon's Souls 'underestimated' by Sony
Shack PSA: Skyrim PS3 players should create new manual save
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Microsoft didn't fire this individual.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 25 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
"The Legislature finds and declares that state employees should be free to report waste, fraud, abuse of authority, violation of law, or threat to public health without fear of retribution."
Discussing the backstory of the 360 is intersting, but it didn't inform the public about a new problem. Frankly, Delawares job was to find bugs. In the article, he talked about finding bugs. Bug fix order at any company is based on the chance an ender user will get hit by the bug and the severity of the result. Games, for all platforms, ship with Updates with games. If anything, he is simply arguing for more testing of the updates before release. While interesting points, neither point at anything worthy of the whistleblower lable.
If you aren't authorised to talk to the press at a big company, doing so is a fast way to lose your job. Period. Legal protection may exists if you are alerting the public about a major issue, but even then, legal protection doesn't protect you from getting put on boring projects/slowly pushed out. It also makes you a wildcard for potential future employers. People have to be really careful about this stuff on both sides.
This is also the main reason i will never buy a Xbox 360, let alone a PS3. ill stick my PC in which I do 3d and web work, games, internet browse, download music, software i need, do my taxes, chat. and is moderately stable, but either way you look at it,its like comparing one turd to another. one just has more uses to get out of it. I think microsoft is a bunch of greedy arse monopolistic conglomerate and they have lost sight on where they came from.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Poor (e)scape goat.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Anyway, the article was a good read, and thank you Mr. Delaware for sacrificing your job and taking on a substantial legal burden to prove what many already knew. I'm not sure what you hoped to accomplish, but I hope you achieved it.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
I understand what he did was 'wrong' from a workplace point of view. Violating his work terms, etc. and the company did fire him for it, but it just looks wrong.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.