Proposed Anti-Piracy Laws Could Ban Suspected European Pirates from Internet Access
by Aaron Linde, Jul 07, 2008 8:00pm PDTA series of anti-piracy proposals in consideration by the European Union could result in internet users being permanently banned from the web if suspected of sharing copyrighted materials, the BBC reports.
The amendments also call for a Europe-wide "three strikes" law, which would ban users from the web after three warnings that they are suspected of sharing copyrighted materials on file-sharing networks. The laws also allow governments to decide what software can "lawfully" be used on the internet.
Digital rights campaigners claim that anti-piracy lobbyists have hijacked the proposals and worked in amendments that amount to an assault on the freedoms of web users.
"Tomorrow, popular software applications like Skype or even Firefox might be declared illegal in Europe if they are not certified by an administrative authority," said Foundation for a Free Internet Infrastructure representative Benjamin Henrion, who added that the proposals would create a "Soviet internet."
Piracy has become a grave concern for many developers worldwide, prompting studios such as Crytek, Infinity Ward, and several others to publicly voice their concerns and deploy draconian anti-piracy measures in their software.
Members of the European Parliament were scheduled to vote on the proposals today, though the results of the vote were not immediately available.
European Parliament member and bill proponent Malcolm Harbour dismissed concerns, suggesting instead that the amendments would likely improve rights for consumers. Meanwhile, the UK-based law firm Cobbetts LLP countered that the amendment will cause myriad technical problems for legitimate users.
"Many broadband users routinely transfer large files which are encrypted," said Cobbetts media partner Susan Hall. "Many of these are acting quite legitimately and in order to determine whether or not such large files are or are not the produce of illicit file sharing the ISP will have to carry out an unprecedented degree of analysis of its customers' traffic."
"Furthermore, computers are frequently shared—within offices, within homes, within educational institutions and inadvertently, where wrong-doers 'piggy back' on an inadequately secured Wi-Fi connection. All this raises the specter of people losing internet access—for reasons which are no fault of their own," Hall concluded.
New video game releases of 2/13-2/19
Indie Jeff's Weekly Pick: Gunpoint
Daily Filter: Mass Effect 3, Alan Wake's American Nightmare
Blizzard files opposition to Valve's Dota trademark
Twisted Metal promotion blows up Sweet Tooth's truck
Comments
Call yourselves Browncoats, my friends, and the numbers of freedom fighters will be boundless.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 44 replies.
Host lots of fake content that looks like its infringing, spoof IP addresses on real trackers so that hundreds of innocents are hit (hopefully hitting MP's, MEP's, Celebs and laser printers).
It suddenly becomes plainly obvious that the cost of pursuing it in this manner is both impossible, and very risky. And if ISP's are stupid enough to disconnect customers at first, they will stop quickly when half their customers are fingered.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Copyright infringement != stealing or theft, its just what it is Copyright infringement.
Copyright infringement = civil matter, not criminal.
If you've sung happy Birthday without ever paying royalties your no better than those dirty Crysis pirates.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
WTF?
Why would it be illegal to use freeware?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.
Bloody Reds.
I also don't agree with all the idiots here lashing out against it so thoughtlessly it makes the rest of us look stupid and ignorant. They're like that Slashdot crowd that believes stealing games and music is somehow a noble form of vigilantism and doesn't hurt the developers whatsoever.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
God keep our land glorious and free... -- O Canada
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave o'er the land of the free... -- The Star Spangled Banner
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 19 replies.
SUSPECTED. wow.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Fact 1)and easily...
Fact 2)
Intellectual Property is information....
The root problem lies in the paradigm that Intellectual Property is a physical manifestation that can be produced, marketed, distributed, and controlled just like any other product.
How can you control something on a system that was designed to distrubute it quickly and easily?
You can't, and its an uphill battle.
Agreed, People do pour their efforts, time, and money into creating this information and need to be compensated somehow... but control of the IP itself is not the answer.
They need to find other revenues to obtain their compensation. Via service, ads, promise of continuous updates and the like....
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
It will never happen but they will vote to put it in place then not put any money in to the systerm its just gona fail befor it starts over all another plan they just did not bother to think out.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 12 replies.
Any company who falsely or mistakenly sues the wrong person (e.g. a college laser printer's IP address) for copyright infringement, for any reason, a total of three times has THEIR internet cut. Their corporate link as well as their webservers.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
this were proposals in 2 industry committees within the parliament. those proposal were discussed until yesterday and were part of the so called "telecoms package" which actually has nothing to do with copyright infringments. but, some of the things mentioned here seem to have already been neglected again. german it news heise.de reported yesterday that an amendment proposal would scrap all of that except a passage about lawful content. hopefully this ammendment gets accepted an the passage about lawful content dismissed in the final voting process of the eu parliament in september.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
BASTARDS!
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/news/EkEVVpuFlApoyDjYJv.html
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.