Microsoft: Simultaneous PC, 360 Releases Would 'Shoot Ourselves in the Foot' Due to PC Popularity
by Chris Faylor, Jul 01, 2008 9:12am PDTSimultaneously releasing a major first-party game on PC and Xbox 360 in Germany would "basically shoot [Microsoft] in the foot" due to the popularity of the PC platform, Microsoft Game Studios European business director Peter Zetterberg has stated.
"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he told GamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."
Though Zetterberg seems to indicate that Microsoft is intentionally limiting the PC market to further its console business--echoing an accusation made by World of Warcraft developer Blizzard--the executive claimed that both platforms are "equally important" on a global scale.
However, he noted that "in some territories we need to make the games for the 360 to increase the sales there," justifying that rationale because "the PC has a much wider use, it's so established, it's so dominating."
While some other publishers and developers simultaneously release games on multiple consoles and PC, Microsoft has a long history of publishing PC ports of console games long after their debut.
The original Halo hit Xbox in 2001 but didn't arrive on PC until 2003. Halo 2 debuted on Xbox in 2004, the PC version didn't arrive until 2007. Fable released on Xbox in 2004 and PC a year later
However, one exception arises: last year's simultaneous PC and Xbox 360 release of FASA's multiplayer shooter Shadowrun, after which the internal studio was closed.
Despite the apparent business preference for Xbox 360, Zetterberg noted that he doesn't let that get in the way when he's dealing with game pitches.
"I've had an RTS game pitched to me on the 360," he revealed. "As they pitch, clearly this is not a good idea to do it on the Xbox 360. But their argument was that they could potentially sell more on the console because it's more of a mass market machine than the PC. We suggested that they came back with a PC pitch. "
Splinter Cell Blacklist co-op modes partially detailed
FIFA 14 on PC won't use Ignite engine
Ace Attorney Trilogy coming to iOS next week
Far Cry 3 editor jazzed up with Blood Dragon shinies
Epic Mickey 2 for Vita coming June 18
Poker Night 2 antes up on iOS
Warhammer Quest hitting iOS May 30
Super Stardust dev making 'spiritual successor' for PS4
Dungeons & Dragons: Chronicles of Mystara preview: classic arcade revival
Final Fantasy XIV gets reborn on August 27; collector's edition detailed



Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
PC Gaming is DOMINANT :D
Make up your minds already!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
Yes microsoft get a bigger cut from third party games on xbox over pc so i can imagine them not wanting to share exclusives for third party games with pc, if for example GTA4 had been released on PC as well as 360 on launch, anyone buying the pc version over 360 would be chipping into microsofts profits from the game.
their abysmal first party for pc is shocking though, anyone want another zoo tycoon expansion, because we sure aint getting project gotham 4 or forza 2 any time soon, at least not until the next version of windows and they need us to fork out another £180 to finance the next lot of 360 exclusives.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
To be fair though you see this in almost all kinds of media: special edition CDs, Lord of the Rings (they came out with the extended versions months after the regular versions), etc. etc. I guess I'm a consumer that wants it all right then and there. I'm more likely to get angered and not purchase out of frustration than be confused with what releases I should be looking for.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Its a good thing they aren't the only company publishing PC games. Let them do what they want, if it works it works, if it bites them in the ass, it bites them in the ass. Microsoft is the only company in this unique situation. No other developer/publisher has to worry about competing between their own platform.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53393
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Why the nine hells would they crawl out from under some rock and get themselves squashed? Can't they shut up for sometime? It makes no sense. If they are going to announce something that is going to make people hate them, why bother? Why? This does nothing for the shareholders either. Its just unbelievable and ridiculous.
Es gibt kein battle nein! So unabhängig!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
The guys at Blizzard really called it in saying where Microsoft's priorities were. I'm thinking more and more that it will be up to companies like Valve and Blizzard when it comes to maintaining genuine dedication to the PC. Games for Windows just shows that Microsoft's heart is in the right place...if it were up its own ass.
I also think I read a couple times how the average gaming PC around here is way more powerful than an US gamer PC. (actually the wording usually is exactly the opposite, since that was a little shocker for some here.)
On the other hand, online platforms and webbased gaming are a topic which seems to be far from the acceptance it has in other places. This might change though, since Valve recently did a couple things to enhance it's support for germany, personally I really look forward to "uncensored" non german versions on steam. Go Valve! ;)
You must be logged in to post.