Homeworld Franchise Potentially Ressurected As Relic Owner THQ Acquires Trademark
by Nick Breckon, Nov 03, 2007 6:03pm PDTFans of the groundbreaking Homeworld series of 3D space RTS games may yet have reason to hope for a new sequel. Forum members of the fan site Relic News have today uncovered a US trademark document that appears to prove the rights to the Homeworld name have changed hands from Vivendi Universal to publisher THQ, the owner of original Homeworld developer Relic Entertainment. Though only the trademark is mentioned, it would seem unlikely that THQ attained the name without also acquiring the license to use the intellectual property. The law firm now handling the trademark, Wolf Greenfield, specializes in IP transactions. The document, which appoints a slew of new attorneys to represent Homeworld, is signed by THQ executive vice president of business and legal affairs James M. Kennedy. The transaction took place on August 14, 2007, with a similar transfer of the Homeworld: Cataclysm expansion trademark having been signed on the same day. While the ties to THQ only appear on the most recent documents, Vivendi Universal lawyer Rod Rigole had transferred power of attorney to Douglas R. Wolf, the current Homeworld representative, way back in July 18 of 2006--indicating that some type of transaction may have occured over a year ago. The Homeworld license had been owned by publisher Sierra Online--now a subsidiary of Vivendi--since it released Relic's debut game, the strategy series' first entry, in 1997. Relic was purchased by THQ for $10 million in May of 2004, and has since gone on to produce the critically acclaimed PC RTS titles Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War (2004) and Company of Heroes (2006). THQ has been investing more development effort in ambitious hardcore-oriented PC titles than most major publishers recently, with its acquisition of Relic and its release of games such as Iron Lore's Titan Quest, Gas Powered Games' Supreme Commander, and GSC Game World's S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Homeworld puts players in control of a vast space fleet, allowing would-be admirals to move their ships on a fully-3D plane in real time. The first game was released on the PC in 1999, to critical and commercial success. The Homeworld: Cataclysm stand-alone expansion was subsequently developed by Barking Dog Studios, with Relic returning to the franchise in 2003 with Homeworld 2. Both games were published by Sierra.
Wargame: Airland Battle trailer details dynamic campaign
Halo 'Bootcamp' confirmed by Microsoft
Weekend PC download deals: Tomb Raider for $14
Game Dev Tycoon studio outlines future plans
Baldur's Gate 2 Enhanced already has 350,000 words of new content



Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
But it was brutally difficult. I never finished it, and never played the sequel either.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 19 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
http://forums.relicnews.com/showpost.php?p=2636195&postcount=58
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
1st the intro
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrW4jkQdmjI
2nd is the music in homeworld, Agnus Dei
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyt06cv1VvE
3rd you run away from home, only to come back
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJvYZXUT5Bk
God i loved this game soooo much.
It was pure innovation for its time.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 12 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
But how many people that worked on the Homeworld series are still at Relic?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 11 replies.
I really hope they make Homeworld 3, but I don't think we'll see it until 2009-2010. But knowing the possibility gives us all something to live for and keep an extra $60 to spare.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Think World in Conflict but different. Think one player having the strategic overview of the battlespace (literally space heh) and control of the production facilities and laying out general order requests.
Other players on the team would then have command of different squads of units produced based on their roles, like Fighter/Escort/Scout, Bomber/Anti-Fighter/Turrets, Bombardment/CapitalShips, etc.
That way you could assign an AI(or another human) to handle the strategic overview if you wanted to focus on tactical play, or vice versa if you felt like defining the strategy while AI(or other humans) actually giving squad-level orders to the units.
This combined arms chain-of-command approach would allow more advanced tactics and focused play, instead of Homeworld 2 (for example) where you often under-utilized so much of the vast potential found in ships and their upgrades because it was simply too much for one player to really handle in the course of a match.
http://www.battlestarmod.com/
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
You must be logged in to post.