• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Game Politics: Congress, Talk to Rockstar, Take-Two

by Chris Remo, Jun 19, 2006 10:15am PDT
Related Topics – Rockstar, ESRB

Dennis McCauley's Game Politics has been by far the most complete and well-reseached source for coverage of the ever increasing collisions between the video game industry and the worlds of politics and law. This weekend, McCauley published an editorial claiming that Washington, with its recent congressional hearing about games and previous senate hearing, has been barking up the wrong tree by questioning people like the Entertainment Software Association's Doug Lowenstein and the ESRB's Patricia Vance. Rather, he argues, Capitol Hill should be demaning answers from executives at Take-Two and Rockstar, the companies involved with last year's Hot Coffee incident that put a renewed focus on legislating games. As a means to pin down specific responsibility for the events, he has come up with a few questions to start off:

-who conceived the Hot Coffee idea? -who created the animations? -who eventually decided to nix it from the final version? -why it wasn't removed from the disc entirely? -did insiders realize the active and highly-skilled GTA mod community would find the sex animations? -why did Rockstar and Take-Two lie about Hot Coffee when it was revealed? -why did they try to blame the mess on their biggest fans, the GTA mod community?
McCauley notes that many game-related bills currently being written, debated, or passed have had the momentum to continue only because of the lingering Hot Coffee uproar. "In California, for example, Leland Yee's video game bill was, by his own admission, dead in the water in June of 2005," he writes. "Hot Coffee burst onto the scene in July. By October, Yee's bill had been passed and signed into law. It now awaits a ruling from a federal judge on its constitutionality." Noted designer Warren Spector had some critical words for Rockstar last year, McCauley notes, despite his admiration and respect for the ambitious game designs the company has pioneered. The driving point of the Game Politics editorial seems to be that, as would be the case with a particularly controversial book or movie, the issues regarding controversial games should be limited to those particular games rather than forcing the industry as a whole to defend itself in broad strokes.




Comments

20 Threads* | 83 Comments













  • OBVIOUS:

    -who conceived the Hot Coffee idea?
    It was part of the core game idea. Something that got spurted out in a brainstorming idea. The specific team member who suggested it is irrelevent.
    -who created the animations?
    DUH. The animators. Who cares? It is irrelevent. It's not some animators fault at Rockstar for doing his job.
    -who eventually decided to nix it from the final version?
    Ok, now we're getting somewhere. But the answer is still pretty obvious. The management team, when they realized it would give them an "AO" rating.
    -why it wasn't removed from the disc entirely?
    To save time. It was probably a last minute decision. It's probably easier to disable it via some code rerouting.
    -did insiders realize the active and highly-skilled GTA mod community would find the sex animations?
    Ok, here is the operant question!
    -why did Rockstar and Take-Two lie about Hot Coffee when it was revealed?
    To cover their ass. But good question. They should be accountable for obviously lying about this. Their first statements were basically to the affect that none of the content was there, but pretty silly when a small binary patch (a few kilobytes?) contains a ton of art, animation, and game logic.
    -why did they try to blame the mess on their biggest fans, the GTA mod community?
    Because they're lame.

    This whole thing is still retarded. One of the most violent games ever, a game that allows you to turn into a murdering nutcase and do all sorts of wrong, gets an "M" rating. Then they throw in some sex (no worse than a Leisure Suit Larry game) and its a big deal. I love repressed American sexuality... Shooting people ok! Sex is a no-no!