• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

The Hot New Trend in Gaming

by Chris Remo, Dec 05, 2005 1:30pm PST
Related Topics – Games: PC, Monolith

Sometimes you just have to wonder if there are quotas the mainstream press needs to fill in singling out potentially harmful content in video games. There have been countless lawsuits and attempted pieces of legislation relating to violent and sexually explicit material in games, but recently the accusations have been getting even more ridiculous. Case in point: mainstream media outlets all over the country are warning of a cannibalism trend in games, spearheaded by titles such as Wideload's Stubbs the Zombie (Xbox, PC) and Monolith's F.E.A.R. (PC). It started when MediaWise put out its list of titles released this year that parents should avoid. Then, the media picked up on "cannibalistic" scenes in those two games, and it spread like wildfire. I think it goes without saying that Stubbs the Zombie is a zombie, and as a member of the undead is generally not considered a cannibal. (Developer Wideload has more to say about that.)

Games featuring graphic scenes of cannibalism, "F.E.A.R." and "Stubbs the Zombie in Rebel Without a Pulse," were among the 12 "games to avoid" listed Tuesday by the National Institute on Media and the Family. "It's something we've never seen before," said institute president David Walsh, warning that today's games are "more extreme" and more easily available to underage kids than ever before.
Game Politics has been tracking the phenomenon, with links to more than 35 local and national news sources covering the story. This one has a video feature available for your perusal, calling the games thare are "all about cannibalism" a "disturbing new trend." None of the reporters seemed to notice that there have been far more films about zombies in recent years, just about all of which feature zombies eating human body parts, than games. The difference, I suppose, is that after playing a cannibalistic video game, kids would be much more likely to go out and attempt to eat their friends than they would be after seeing a zombie movie. Right?




Comments

38 Threads | 86 Comments


  • Cheers to Wideload for that wonderful community response on the news media bullshit. I'm going out this afternoon and picking up your game, regardless of what the shack or any other gaming site thinks about it.

    The news media is always full of shit one way or another. You know what I would LOVE to see? A BIG GAMING site (ign, gamespot, gamespy, shack) just make shit up about the movie industry, or books, telling people to stay away from them, and not let thier kids watch/read it.

    "This just in, Mr. Jones and Mrs. Smith, is an extremely violent movie, full of sexual innuendo and gunplay which should not be viewed by your beloved family members for fear of blowing up the house this coming holiday season!!! Do NOT put this DVD under the christmas tree this year."

    Seriously, WTF?

  • It's about time media sources which blindly spit out this kind of utter bullshit started getting either shut down or forced to label their products "MADE UP SHIT -- NOT THE NEWS". They have a duty and a responsibility to actually investigate what they're writing about and to intelligently inform the public.

    It's not just videogames, it's pretty much everything. Part of it is laziness, part of it is the desire to make money and boost circulation no matter what and I expect part of it is a political/moral agenda that they're more than willing to bend the truth to support. None of those are a valid excuse for publishing lies and, god dammit, they shouldn't be allowed to anymore.

    But you won't see a fuckwit senator stepping in to support this cause, will you? Because they're as full as shit as the media is, they're scared of what the media will say about them if they attack it, and they're probably taking advantage of the lies in the media half the time themselves.

    Sigh. I want to get off this stupid planet and find another species to live amoung.








  • I got disconnected (I hate being on dial up...wish broadband was available...but thats another subject) before I could post this. So I'll do it again:

    What bothers me is that this is taken completely out of context. In F.E.A.R. its simply part of the story...its not a major part even. But taking it out for fear of offending people because of "cannibalism" is moronic! This isn't about oversensationalised violence or shock for the sake of shock-value...they're now getting all pissed off over offensive ideas in general. This logic could easily be applied to other forms of expression as well (forms of expression that have fortunately fended off enough attacks from the ravenous retard mob to be relatively safe (occasional "banned-books" not-withstanding)). I mean, I'd hate to see what these folks would do if they found out that their kids are encouraged to read things like (GASP) Heart of Darkness or 1984 (ugh...icky sex scenes...and torture!) or what-have-you (yeah, this is where I got disconnected...lost my train of thought).

    Movies have a lot of shit in them too...the argument I keep hearing about video games is that "uhm, they let you do the 'bad stuff' though," which IMHO is a flawed argument anyway...but thats not really the entire issue here. FEAR's getting targeted...FEAR's "cannibalism" is carried out by the 'bad guy' in a cut-scene. Not only are you not doing it in the game...but its in a non-interactive section...essentially a MOVIE! Right here the whole, "but you're doing it" argument is being dropped (albeit quietly because so long as you say "its a game" the average person who's never played this game or games in general will think otherwise). These folks claim they want to have laws banning young people from getting games that aren't appropriate for them...BUT there are no LAWS that say a young person can't get a movie that isn't appropriate for them with "dangerous ideas" in it. As far as I know...it isn't illegal at all to sell Hannibal or Silence of the Lambs or whatever to a kid...there are policies in place at a number of stores regarding this...but it isn't a matter of law (same situation with Video Games). Hell, it definately isn't against the law for a kid to see something "offensive" on TV. Why attack games then; because they're an easier target. The movie industry has a more effective lobbying group (same with the music industry)...more people have been avid movie watchers than gamers I'd imagine (at least among groups that VOTE)...games are new, AND they're artistic value is at question by some...some would say that their legal status as protected expression hasn't been established across the nation (I imagine there are people in the anti-game camp who'd love to take this to the Supreme Court in the hopes that they might say "oh its not expression...its something else...no protections there...sorry"). Other forms of media have gone through this...so there is definate hope...but its always worrisome that a lot people are against the freedoms of expression and thought in any new form (it makes you wonder if they're all that keen on the already better protected forms).







  • "The normal question, the first question is, are these cannibals? No, they are not. Cannibalism in the true sense of the word implies an interspecies activity. These creatures cannot be considered human. They prey on humans. They do not prey on each other, that's the difference. They attack and they feed only on warm flesh. Intelligence? Seemingly no reasoning ability, but basic skills remain from a remembered everyday life. There have been reports of these creatures using tools. But even these are the most basic, the use of tools as bludgeons and so forth. I might point out that even animals have been known to adopt the use of tools in this manner. These creatures are nothing but pure, motorized instinct. We must not be lulled by the concept that they are our family members or our friends. They are not. They will not respond to such emotions. They must be destroyed on sight!"

    -Dr. Millard Rausch, "Dawn of the Dead"