• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Microsoft Using Immersion to Undermine Sony?

by Alec Matias, Apr 04, 2005 10:52am PDT
Related Topics – Microsoft, Sony

That's the claim by SPoNG who recently talked with the CEO Victor Viegas. Microsoft's settlement with Immersion back in 2003 put MS in a position to actually make money off the deal. SPoNG also asks why Immersion only sued Microsoft and Sony for patent infringement yet steered clear of Nintendo.

To recap, Immersion, backed by Microsoft will have the right to demand royalties from Sony on every single PlayStation product that makes use of DualShock, an astoundingly astute move resulting in a case that Sony simply must win.
Read the full story here.




Comments

14 Threads* | 21 Comments

  • April Fools? There is a suit, Nintendo does use a different system and Immersion 's patents shouldn't apply to Sony. This case has gone the distance because of Microsoft's strategy and investment. A rattling controller is not force feedback.

    Haptics involves applying forces to the actual control device (the joystick) in a sort of reverse pressure against a person's inputs. It is direct resistance to the player's efforts (or user in the broader application). The DualShock doesn't do this. Furthermore, even if Immersion's patents are declared broadly enough to cover indirect transmission and non-resistive forces, there is a ton of prior art out there to declare such a patent invalid.

    Frankly I have to think that either Sony's lawyers are incompetent or there is something else going on here. I don't know if Immmersion has licensed their 'technology' out to medical firms but true force feedback is in use in the medical field as well as having been used in the military for decades.

    After reading that recent bit on Microsoft's legal tactics against the kid who sold his software on ebay (and the years of stories of their business practices) it wouldn't surprise me in the least that Microsoft is up to no good here. I have always thought that Immersion was one of those companies that prefers to get a patent and litigate rather than truly innovate. They probably picked up their patents somewhere or just managed to play the system as so many did in the 90s and have just been quietly building up a history til no one thinks to question the legitimacy of their claims. Again though, Sony's loses so far are quite surprising since the DualShock is not that innovative (from a basic technology standpoint).

    Also the original DualShock was delayed over patent issues wasn't it? Didn't they say they had paid fees to someone already, or develop their own system. Something stinks here...