• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Piracy Checks At LAN Parties?

by Jack Mathews, Nov 05, 2001 1:34pm PST
Related Topics – Games: PC, Piracy

Well Zoid stumbled upon this story about a LAN party in Denmark that was busted for software piracy by an anti-piracy group. Now, while this did not happen in the states, it does pose some interesting concerns. For one, not only are the participants getting investigated and fined, but the organizers of the event are as well for providing the network. So what if there is a piracy crackdown here at LAN parties. How hard would it be for someone from the SPA to hook up to the LAN at QuakeCon and find hundreds of copies of Photoshop and Office floating around? Or what of the thousands of gigs of MP3's being shared? Who will be held responsible? I'll admit that I know nothing about these laws, so I figured I'd pose the questions to you guys.




Comments

60 Threads | 356 Comments*









  • Nice one.

    What makes me feel angry is that this bust hinges on two possibilities :

    1.) Someone at the LAN actually let the respective authorities aware this was happening, and reccommended they 'come on down' for an easy bust. That in itself is fucked. Some self-righteous, bitter prick saw an oppurtunity to get alot of guys up shit creek, and jumped at it.

    2.) The respective authorities actually got wind of this LAN ( it was prolly advirtised on fuck knows how many mediums ) and made a collective decision to make a bust - on the whim they'd find warez at the event. Which, hey - they did. Gee, Who'd have thought ?

    Both scenarios are fucked. I'd challenge anyone who's into law enforcement, or whatever, to look me in the eye, and tell me every piece of software on their PC at home is totally lisenced, and legit. People in that very niche of law enforcement are the stupidest hicks conceivable, and have no idea about what they are dealing with, and are among those of us who 'borrow' CDs, disks, etc from their cousin, mum, dad, brother, sister, neighbour, friends etc for use at home.

    'Hey thats cool, can I get a copy of that ? Can I borrow the CD for a couple days ?'

    * Rip, Burn, ISO, Install, call-knowledgeable-family-member-who-knows-computahs-to-install-for-me, etc *

    It's not like Joe Friend, brother, cousin, neighbour, whatever is going to say 'No ! Piracy is illegal and immoral ! Make your way to the store and buy your own lisenced copy ! How dare you suggest such a taboo notion !'

    However - I am not niave to the damage 'casual' piracy is causing, and I agree that it's a problem. Though, I am a firm believer that alot of guys out there freely warez stuff, and, if it's good, and if it's going to grace their hdd for more than a week ( i.e. it's not shite ), they will indeed BUY the lisenced product.

    ( Except Microsoft stuff. Fuck those capitalist pigs. The more people that warez M$ shite, the fuckin' better. Ahem. IMO :) )

    If they have the power to just walk on in and carry out a 'warez' bust - do that to corperations, not a bunch of guys who are playing Quake and Counter-Strike, with an MP3 playing in the background.

    Double standards, contradictions & two faced probably aren't the right words for the situation, but they're the first thing that comes to mind.

    I hate this subject of discussion :)




  • If a piece of software is quality work, or a game is quality work, I will download the warez, and then I will buy it. I've done this to about 5 titles, if I cant get ahold of the warez, and I dont see enough in the demo, then more than likely I will not buy the game, I know damn well way more than half of you dont go out and buy a $50.00 game and never try the demo. I understand how the software market works, and I respect the companies that create quality titles, and I will pay my hard earned money for their hard earned effort. I will, however, not pay for a title that isnt worth the money, and I determine this by downloading a warez version, if I dont like the title, why should I pay for it? and why should teh software company that made that game care either? People purchase software because they have a want to use it, if you dont have that want, then you shouldnt pay for it, and the company that created the software shouldn't expect you to. That's my outlook on the situation, now as far as these lan party crackdowns, if someone came up to me and asked me for my windows 2000 key, Ill stand up and ask them for 250 dollars to pay for it. Some pieces of software which are extremely useful are targetting for corporations, NOT for end-users. I cant afford a 4,000 3d modeling program, 250 for an operating system, or 500 for a office bundle.