"To achieve this, Intel designed the compiler to compile code along several alternate code paths. ... By design, the code paths were not created equally. If the program detects a "Genuine Intel" microprocessor, it executes a fully optimized code path and operates with the maximum efficiency. However, if the program detects an "Authentic AMD" microprocessor, it executes a different code path that will degrade the program's performance or cause it to crash.""
Update: Looks like some Intel offices just got raided!
A press release about industry support, performance, pricing, etc can be found here. The Athlon 64 3200+ will retail for around $417 while the Athlon 64 FX-51 will retail for somewhere around $733.
UT2003 640x480 - Flyby Athlon 64 FX-51 285.3 fps Pentium 4 3.2Ghz Extreme Edition 265.4 fps Athlon 64 3200+ 264.2 fps Pentium 4 3.2Ghz 235.5 fps Athlon XP 3200+ 211.3 fps Athlon XP 2500+ 173.7 fps
In the extensive benchmark tests under Linux Enterprise Server 8 (32-bit as well as 64-bit), the AMD Opteron made a good impression. Especially in the server disciplines, the benchmarks (MySQL, Whetstone, ARC 2D, NPB, etc.) show quite clearly that the Dual Opteron puts the Dual Xeon in its place.
update: More info @ AMD website , Linux Magazine , Newsforge (Thanks /.), HardOCP.
Oh yeah, Hammer time! HAHA OMG YOU GUYS HAD NO IDEA I COULD MAKE SO MUCH FUNNY.SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 31, 2003 today announced that the worldwide introduction of its next-generation, 64-bit AMD Opteron(TM) processor for servers and workstations will take place on April 22 in New York City. AMD plans to follow up with the introduction of the AMD Athlon(TM) 64 processor for the desktop and mobile markets in September 2003. AMD also announced today that it will introduce the AMD Athlon XP processor 3000+ on February 10 and the AMD Athlon XP processor 3200+ in mid-2003. These processors, based on the core code-named "Barton," feature additional integrated cache memory for industry-leading performance. [snip]
Advertisement