• #12
    Refresh Thread
    By: speon x Show Full Post
    Reply
    Looks great.

    However, one soldier getting nailed at nearly point blank range by a tank should gib into a mess of bloody chunks instead of flying away intact, like he was smacked by battering ram or something.

    Having a war game without blood is just ludicrous IMO, if not down right irresponsible - and at the very least - retarded. (I'm looking at you MoH and BF.)
    Aug 26, 2004 9:32am PDT
    toggle
    Looks great. However, one soldier getting nailed at nearly point blank range by a tank should gib into... : speon

    Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.

    • I'm looking at YOU Joseph Liebermann. : mojoald
    • toggle
      I'm looking at YOU bottom line. Seriously - EA doesn't put blood in their games so that they can sell mo... : dengar65This person is cool!
      • For real. Knowing that above points just doesn't curb the pain though...it just makes me more pissed off ... : speon
      • toggle
        So explain how a war game is good for younger kids without blood. : [7]kamiThis person is cool!
        • It's not, but the game will get a mature rating with blood most likely, as retarded as that is. : Speedy8This person is cool!
    • There's Blood in 1942 and vietnam, it's just very subtle. It doesnt gush out in giant flows, it just kind... : n0v4This person is cool!
    • Blood is overrated : sheffThis person is cool!