Show Full Post
However, one soldier getting nailed at nearly point blank range by a tank should gib into a mess of bloody chunks instead of flying away intact, like he was smacked by battering ram or something.
Having a war game without blood is just ludicrous IMO, if not down right irresponsible - and at the very least - retarded. (I'm looking at you MoH and BF.)
Aug 26, 2004 9:32am PDT
Looks great. However, one soldier getting nailed at nearly point blank range by a tank should gib into...
Thread Truncated. Click to see all
I'm looking at YOU Joseph Liebermann.
I'm looking at YOU bottom line. Seriously - EA doesn't put blood in their games so that they can sell mo...
For real. Knowing that above points just doesn't curb the pain though...it just makes me more pissed off ...
So explain how a war game is good for younger kids without blood.
It's not, but the game will get a mature rating with blood most likely, as retarded as that is.
There's Blood in 1942 and vietnam, it's just very subtle. It doesnt gush out in giant flows, it just kind...
Blood is overrated