Can someone explain to me in a rational manner, why hackers who purport to be on the side of open systems for the benefit of consumers, would release a hack that could potentially reduce/decrease a lot of paying consumers' access to software?
If what happens to the PSP (sieve-like protections resulting in fleeing developers) happens to the PS3, sure you've succeeded in poking Sony in the eye, but they've also had a decisively negative impact on the consumers they say they represent.
Is there some perspective I'm not seeing? Can't they fight they're crusade without making me (paying consumer) collateral damage?
Jan 27, 2011 5:54pm PST