• #3
    Refresh Thread
    By: Sturm08 x Show Full Post
    Reply
    Hold on -- the campaign multiplayer they promised for the base game is only available in the expansion? I don't want to make assumptions -- is that the case?

    I was really disappointed with the first game. I felt the naval portion was completely tacked on and just didn't matter, especially when the AI didn't use naval transports. The siege battles just don't work (death by path planning) and I felt like most battles could be resolved with similar tactics.

    I know this is one of the great sandbox RTS games, but I'd love to see more pre-set historical battles that present tactical/strategic challenges. I'd love to see naval incorporated into the land more, like Horatio Hornblower-esque raids, taking out shore batteries, and more.

    I love this time period but I want more out of the game. Also, will Wellington be in this pack?
    Jan 20, 2010 3:53pm PST
    toggle
    Hold on -- the campaign multiplayer they promised for the base game is only available in the expansion? I... : Sturm08

    Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.

    • toggle
      Napoleon isn't an expansion, as far as I understand it, but rather an all-new entry. : Chris Faylor
      • Oh really? That's interesting. I'm curious what all they are adding in addition to the story...and campai... : Sturm08
    • "Hold on -- the campaign multiplayer they promised for the base game is only available in the expansion?"... : Turin TurambarThis person is cool!