• #54
    Refresh Thread
    By: kershner25 x Show Full Post
    Reply
    What is the appeal of this game at all? Is this some kind of spiritual successor to Operation Flashpoint? That game was flawed as hell but fun, this game is playing just like it.

    It seems that a lot of people are hyped about the graphics, but seriously, what the hell? This game runs like shit on my beast of a computer and I honestly do not see anything great about the graphics. Extremely long draw distance? Sure, but what is the goddamn point? Character models look terrible! Nothing really remarkable about the texture work, although it's not bad by any means.

    Someone explain this game to me, Fallout 3 looks exceedingly better than this and runs much smoother, this is not even mentioning the *extremely* clunky controls/combat in general (I realize it's supposed to be a complex tactical shooter, but come on, I didn't think it was fun at all!)
    Jun 25, 2009 1:41pm PDT
    toggle
    What is the appeal of this game at all? Is this some kind of spiritual successor to Operation Flashpoint?... : kershner25

    Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.

    • Name another modern combat simulator. There's your answer. : Jobos
    • Bohemia Interactive did develop the original Operation Flashpoint. Codemasters has the rights to the name... : thejay247
    • toggle
      Doesn't a scenario where you're in control of one soldier in a war work much better as a FPS? It just fee... : kershner25
      • toggle
        I'm not sure if you're aware of it, but in ArmA2 you can command far more than "one soldier in a war". Th... : DslyecxiThis person is cool!
        • Done terribly, in my opinion. : kershner25
    • It's the *actual* successor! : dchavez999
    • I see two comparisons to Fallout 3 and COD4. 2 games that have several times the budget this game had and... : BorenKets123
    • This game is like falcon 4.0 but with infantry . The appeal is to people interested in a simulation type ... : ninjase