• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Computers in School is Wasted Money?

by Maarten Goldstein, Sep 13, 2000 6:49am PDT

According to CNN, all the money the government invested in computers in schools might be wasted, as it doesn't seem to be helping student results at all. With a few exceptions such as math, the gain is minimal so it was pretty much unnescesary that the schools invested $27 billion (!) in computers and internet technology. But then of course all the kids are supposed to be downloading porn and playing violent games according to all those new studies, so that would explain it huh.




Comments

67 Threads | 120 Comments



  • Tuna, trust me the ration of worthless bueracrats to computers is so high its staggering (at least in my limited experience, here in almost Hell West Virginia where the sun never shines and the banjo from deliverance keeps strummin' along). Note, if you just cut all the funding you might just get a decent tax cut there...but if we did that when you were in high school you'd be...well...a lot less fortunate (and there are only so many private schools...not enough for everyone even with that bizzare vouchers plan I keep hearing). Now I'm not saying I don't agree with you to an extent...computers in the school aren't vital. However, with all the *real* waste in the school systems (hey I can make a pretty good arguement for eliminating sports, band, and other stuff), I'm not too concerned about the computers. There are going to be a certain amount of computers in the schools anyway for administrative tasks...and a certain ammount for research purposes aren't a bad idea at all (infact, I have no problem with a computer lab in a school for some classes based around that...most high schools have like workshops, and keyboarding classes...it's not like there isn't any precedent for teaching job skills in school systems; and as keyboards (typewriters for those of you who don't know what I'm talking about) fade into obselesence (I know I mispelled that, I don't care...I si a smartee man prorgamerr) Computers can be handy for replacing them (they break a LOT...the typewriters I mean). I gotta go ICQ...be back later


  • alrighty, time for my little take on this.

    Our school has 4 computer labs, 1 lab has 286's (I think), one has p166's and the other two are fairly decent (333's maybe?). This is good, we have programming classes and I probably would never have got around to learning programming if it wasn't for these classes. The only problem I have is they also put one good computer in each class, no matter if it gets used or not. Most teachers don't even know how to turn on a computer and it just collects dust.

    The computers do help education. I learnt to type fast in grade 9 due to computers in the class, I learnt how to type up good, professional documents (don't take this post as an example though heh) and am now learning c as well.

    And the internet? Well.. I just use it to visit the shack when I'm done everything else. It's not as if our school pays for it though (or at least not much) since it's shared by the police station, fire department, town hall, etc.

    Also, the reason so many students are animals now is because the teachers can't do much to them anymore, and they know that. I"m in all advanced classes so I don't have to deal with this much, assuming it's still a factor when you reach gr12. Maybe the students have matured a bit since then? maybe? .... well I haven't but anyways.

    Teaches, if anything, should get paid less then what they currently do (in Canada, ON that is). Up here they are spoiled and don't know what a real job is. For the past 3 years they've striked and stopped all sports and etc. to try and get back at the government. All it's done though is ruin our time tables and shorten our vacations. I say fire all the teachers next time they try to strike (will be soon) and just put volunteers in (hell, even the military heh, not like they're doing much here anyways). If the teachers want to come back they can but otherwise they remained fired.

    btw, my comp teacher is cool and knows what he's talking about. He even makes fun of daikatana with the rest of the class.

  • I've been at the same 2-12 school for a full nine-and-a-quarter years now, and I've been able to watch the integration of technology into the classroom over that time. Our school has unquestionably benefitted from the money spent on technology. The obvious benefits are four years of programming classes, computer apps classes, as well the advent of journalism classes that can actually produce a professional-looking product.

    Beyond these, technology use drops off -- but it certainly isn't nonexistent! One of my favorite history teachers started two years ago to use CD-ROMs and the internet to share all sorts of primary sources and critical commentary with us. We got to see analyses of paintings on the classroom TV, new perspectives on the life of Napoleon Bonaparte, and explore the works of authors we discussed in the classroom. My Physics teacher used an interesting (if simplistic) program in one of the school's labs to show gravitational effects on projectiles and orbiting bodies. A French teacher used the computers to let us use a French version of "My Grandma and Me." They've certainly taken advantage of the computers we have... but at the same time they're really not being used to their full potential.

    Unless computers are seamlessly integrated into the classroom, as a previous poster said (in the example about LCDs in the desks, etc.) they'll never be used to their full potential. As it is teachers must make a planned interruption to their class in order to go to another room and use the computer lab, in most cases. Realizing this, my school has stopped the practice of putting several computers in every classroom: instead, we have large labs of computers that can seat an entire class and are more than powerful enough for our needs (G3s, iMacs, and P-IIs). This way we can more than one class can use them, and every student, or at least every pair of students, gets to share a computer. But as I said above, the full potential of computers as learning tools can never be realized until a teacher can teach to a classroom full of students who are sitting in front of their own computers, using multimedia applications to understand scientific, historical, and rhetorical concepts. Imagine the potential of interactive science textbooks where media is integrated seamlessly into a lesson, and history textbooks that showcase paintings, photographs, and maps as the teacher discusses them. It's mind-boggling.

    I swear, if I ever make a billion bucks, I'm putting it into a school like that.

    J4NUS

  • Here's my take on American Education... Not that it means a whole lot :)

    1) Computers in the classroom: Total waste of time and money. Computer skills? gimme a break, you think the teachers are qualified to teach them that? (I mean k-6, when the kids are all in one classroom). Internet access? what for? so they can learn to shop online?

    2) Calculators in classroom: Stupidest idea ever. Teaches nothing except how to rely totally on a machine to do simple math. My children will never be allowed a calculator in class until they reach Algebra 1 and can prove to me that they can multiply up to 12x12 in their heads.

    3) Overcrowded classrooms: Shouldn't be an issue. as long as they can hear the teacher they can learn. The real problem with large classes is that one teacher can't easily discipline 35+ kids at once.

    4) The REAL problem with US schools?: The kids and to a large extent their parents. Have you seen some of these classrooms today (most of you are smart and are probably in advanced classes where kids are well behaved)? They're fucking animals, poorly behaved, no discipline, no attention span. In other countries when kids dont behave, they are simply not tolerated and sent away or punished severely. In America, if a kid is sent home with a "bad" note, ususally the parents complain to the principle/school board that their "precious little child" isn't being treated fairly and that the teacher is at fault for their child's problem.

    5) teachers should make more money, but it's not really the answer either. I don't think raising the base salary of teachers will entice more "talented" people into the teaching pool. Teaching would be an easy job (with a 3 month vacation built in, lets not forget) if the kids acted appropriately.

    Solutions: corporal punishment? possibly.... Accountablilty is better. the shit has to come down on the kids and parents if they misbehave and disrupt the classroom.

















  • Computers in school aren't wasted money. Think of the people that don't have computers at home. Sure computers in school aren't going to improve their grades, but it can spark their interest in computers and give them the opportunity to gain some computer experience.

    Anybody who thinks ploppin a kid in front of a computer will increase their grades is simply wrong. It's probably more LIKELY to help than TV, but really you're unlikely to see any difference between the two, from a grades standpoint. I mean, kids don't seek out the history channel, and they don't seek out educational web pages either.















  • Heh I remember my Junior year in HS (It was 1997-1998) and our library just got new PCs.

    Our school had one of those tech club thingies and they decided to install Quake in the tech club folders and a few of us guys got a few passwords and played Quake during our study hall every day. (around 5 of us) The teachers didnt care.. they were like "wow cool"

    Then came my Senior year.. teachers found out more about the internet and got paranoid. We started to have Internet passes and if you didn't, you were punished.

    I got banned off of the school PCs near the end of the year because one of my teachers ratted on me for searching homework without a pass.

    I was like "wtf?"

    Its funny how paranoid the school system is about the internet when they dont know all of it.