White House Against Napster
by Maarten Goldstein, Sep 09, 2000 7:04am PDTEven the White House is taking the side of the recording industry in the Napster case now, according to ZDNet. All kinds of organizations filed last-minute briefs yesterday against Napster. Besides support from the Clinton administration, the movie industry as well the NBA were offering support to the RIAA in their suit against Napster.
"Permitting Napster to shelter itself behind [the act] would defeat this basic statutory quid pro quo," the White House argued. "Napster's users would be permitted to engage in digital copying and public distribution of copyrighted works on a scale beggaring anything Congress could have imagined ... yet the music industry would receive nothing in return."
Cradle trailer shows off Russian indie adventure game
WoW Monopoly, StarCraft RISK announced at Toy Fair
Jersey Shore's 'The Situation' signs App deal
Blacklight: Retribution open beta begins Feb 27
Super Stardust Delta free with Vita 3G activation
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
If these people actually used computers and/or had any interest in music, I can almost garuntee you that they would have napster on their computers and be using it.
Hell, I bet the presidents daughter even uses it.
Now thats funny.
Yep, that about sums it up for me.
yeah lets shut down napster that way there will be no more widespread music piracy, we know what we're talking about. HUZZAH!
b00la
The White House is quite the political figure. When did we elect it to office?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 14 replies.
Tremetal makes Daggah look like an amateur....
he sure is uptight about a little free downloading of music.
So, to summarize, FUCK CLINTON.
Thanks!
Phil
Voting Republican since 1984 baby
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
Sincerely,
prower
Shugashack Sports
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/07/1958201&mode=nocomment
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
The artists have every right to be compensated for their work. Unfortunately the music industry does not compensate them in proportion to the money that is made from their work, unless they have become established. The music industry seeks to undermine the very concept of fair use.
The US is not the only country that is under the thumb of these giant corporations. Canada was forced to tax CD-Rs to compensate the music industry for supposed losses caused by illegal copying. In Germany legislation was just passed to tax ALL computer equipment for the losses supposedly incurred by their media conglomerates. Cynics there have started calling it the "Bertleman's tax" since that company will receive a large windfall of cash ontop of already high profits.
When my rights to fair use are again protected, when the artists receive fair compensation for their music, and when corrective action is taken against the music industry for their previous pricing policies, I will again support their right to copyright protection.
Um more like the government can't tax Napster, hence they loose, which is why they give a damn...fags
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 10 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 1 replies.