• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

GeForce2 Quadro2 Pro Announced

by Steve Gibson, Jul 25, 2000 10:27am PDT
Related Topics – NVidia

NVidia has put out the official announcement for the GeForce2 Quadro2 card. As mentioned earlier the specs are slightly faster and also ask the question, didnt NVidia say the GF2 core wasnt capable of handling these speeds? Hmmm (Thanks Conor Stokes)




Comments

20 Threads | 37 Comments













  • NVIDIA invested engineering time to create the workstation features of the Geforce. They have to regain that investment somehow. How can they BEST do that? Making two separate chips, one consumer, one professional would cost too much and negate the premium they could charge ESPECIALLY given the volume for the pro card is very low. So they build the features into a single chip and disable those features on the consumer marketed unit. It's NOT ripping people off. It's just the realities of manufacturing. Get over it. You're lucky to be able to solder a consumer card to a pro one. How do YOU suggest they go about doing this?

    Same deal with Promise and their controller and RAID cards. Also often the same deal as Intel or AMD speed binning their CPU's, marking 900mhz capable CPU's as a 600, rather than truely make 600mhz CPUs that are less capable than the 900mhz models. It would be ridiculous to run two separate manufacturing lines to make two only slightly different products when you can just build a single chip and castrate it.

    I don't know of many people overclocking their Geforce 2's to 250/400. 230/366 might be common but 250/400 is a bit more rare. And who says you can't overclock the Pro from 250/400 to 275/475? Maybe NVIDIA has been saving some high yield chips for the Pro?

    Yes, very hypocritical of NVIDIA to suddenly pull 5ns 200mhz DDR RAM out of their ass while they say Gainward can't get any. Maybe Elsa and NVIDIA have been giving Infineon handjobs or something. But of course this card isn't released yet. I guess no one is allowed to beat NVIDIA to the punch, eh?