BioShock Infinite box art designed to appeal to frat houses

The decision to use such boring art for BioShock Infinite was quite intentional. Creative director Ken Levine admitted that the cover is meant to appeal to "frathouses and places like that."

31
Based on BioShock Infinite's box art, you'd think it's about some shotgun totin' dude that loves burning American flags or something. Yeah, fight the man! It's an oddly generic box, one that makes the game seem like "generic shooter 2013" and not the next "Ken Levine joint." Sure, Booker is wearing a dapper tie, but it feels like something is missing in this rather boring cover art. Apparently, the decision to use such boring art was intentional. Creative director Ken Levine admitted that the cover is meant to appeal to "frathouses and places like that." According to Levine, the results of a tour surveying gamers that don't read sites like this one were disparaging. "Not a single one of them had heard of [the first BioShock]." Levine was then struck with this revelation: "For some people, [games are like salad dressing... I use salad dressing; I don't read Salad Dressing Weekly. I don't care who makes it, I don't know any of the personalities in the salad dressing business." Levine told Wired that he was "heavily involved with" the design of BioShock's original cover, but admitted that it wasn't effective at attracting a more casual audience. "For the people who aren't informed, that's who the box art is for." Box art connoisseurs will probably want to skip the PS3 version of the game, as it is littered with even more marketing messaging than its other platform counterparts.

The PS3 version of BioShock Infinite proudly touts its exclusive promos

Andrew Yoon was previously a games journalist creating content at Shacknews.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    December 10, 2012 2:30 PM

    Andrew Yoon posted a new article, BioShock Infinite box art designed to appeal to frat houses.

    The decision to use such boring art for BioShock Infinite was quite intentional. Creative director Ken Levine admitted that the cover is meant to appeal to "frathouses and places like that."

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 4:38 PM

      I don't see the issue. It's still a shoot tons of shit action FPS.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 6:00 PM

      Well then their first mistake was naming the game "Bio" anything because I imagine the wider audience they are trying to trick into buying a game they don't want probably just tunes out while their eyes glaze over as soon as they read Bio____.

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 6:11 PM

        WarShock : Infinite Honor

        • reply
          December 10, 2012 6:19 PM

          Sadly, this marketing play does read like the "we need to market this game to EVERYONE!!" tactic that dilutes its meaning among its devotees. They're even sanctioning putting a paper bag over the game box's head (i.e.: printing out a fan-made box cover art sleeve).

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 6:55 PM

          [deleted]

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 6:23 PM

      I rarely see such a benign issue cause so much controversy.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 6:29 PM

      It's one thing to delay a game repeatedly with the promise of further polishing, I'm fine with that. There's nothing wrong with being honest and saying it needs more work and I respect any team willing to fix more issues before a game is debuted to the public.

      This on the other hand sounds like they're trying to tap into the Call of Duty crowd. I hope it's just a marketing mission rather than adapting the game around that market.

      See, I actually like Black Ops 2, but only now because I bought it for PS3 rather than for PC where MW2, Black Ops, and MW3 had a lot of problems.

      But Call of Duty is a quick to pick up, and quick to drop arcade game that is fun and easy to get into.

      Bioshock is supposed to be fun, but incredibly well made and a game that you can really immerse yourself in and be shocked by how unique it is. The story is supposed to be engrossing.

      I fear that once they start trying to market to the wrong crowd they'll start making the game fit the wrong crowd.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 6:32 PM

      If I were Levine, I would just have a reversible cover. Front side is the ugly, generic shit they have now. Back side is some cool, hip cover that highlights Columbia, Elizabeth, or possibly some of their cool enemy design.

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 6:37 PM

        Sounds like a good idea. I love that the Colossus remake did that

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 8:25 PM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 8:26 PM

        Good idea.

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 8:28 PM

        It's probably too late; the sleeves are probably already printing for mass production. Note the wording here:

        "The thing we’re sure about is that we’re going to be releasing a whole set of alternate covers that YOU can download and print."

      • reply
        December 11, 2012 3:29 AM

        I like reversible covers anyway, because you generally have nice art instead of all the silly bullet-list-of-features crap that isn't really exciting.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 6:52 PM

      meh. anytime anyone says "our marketing research shows" what comes next is a bad idea.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 7:39 PM

      No, frat boys have no interest in Bioshock - nor should Ken really give a shit about attracting them. Attempting to get people who are derply in love with Twitch-Twitch-War-Game-2012 to stay at the trough of Bioshock is a defeating notion at best, and at worst - a sign that the game itself is going to stray from the things that made it great in an attempt to nurture the interests of those bros.

      You don't want those bros, Ken. Those bros won't love you.

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 7:42 PM

        Ken doesn't want love; he just wants money.

        • reply
          December 10, 2012 8:26 PM

          Well shit, this relationship is never going to work.

          But... but Ken, until you do me wrong, like Bioware, I'll... I'll give you money.

      • reply
        December 10, 2012 8:40 PM

        Considering that Bioshock sold fairly well, they are pulling in "casuals" / frat boys.

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 8:48 PM

      why not a cover of massive cleavage? if your gonna appeal to the lowest denominator at least go all out

    • reply
      December 10, 2012 9:36 PM

      You know, I couldn't give two shits what the cover art is like. The box will be sitting with the spine exposed, anyway. As long as the game is good, who cares?

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 1:29 AM

      That looks bad, but I prefer the box art of the Steam version anyway.

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 1:35 AM

      Frat boys love ascots

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 2:05 AM

      99% of box art is unoriginal as fuck, why is everyone focusing on this particular box? are people hanging box art on their walls nowadays?

      • reply
        December 11, 2012 2:12 AM

        Because it's very, very popular to call everything "Overrated" and dismiss it out of hand for whatever stupid fucking reason at all.

        Even over the box art.

        Even if no one has played it yet.

        Even if it comes from an excellent pedigree.

        Even if the lead designer has an even better pedigree.

        Because everything is overrated. EVERY. THING.

        Over. Rated. Meaning that not only do you not like the thing, but everyone else who likes the thing is wrong. It's not good enough anymore for someone to just not like the thing, they have to drag everyone else down by denigrating their tastes.

        It's fucking peer pressure stupidity wrapped in the guise of high thinking elitist snobbery.

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 2:15 AM

          Yes.

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 5:14 AM

          congratulations. you win shacknews today

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 6:56 AM

          [deleted]

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 6:57 AM

          [deleted]

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 7:19 AM

          THIS is the post that gets an INF? There are many worthier posts.

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 8:00 AM

          but to be fair Bioshock was overrated


          • reply
            December 11, 2012 8:02 AM

            For everyone that played System Shock.

          • reply
            December 11, 2012 8:27 AM

            The problem with Bioshock was that the game was completely different than we were lead to believe it was going to be. In interviews the developers laid out so many features they wanted to incorporate, but most of them were cut out. Eventually we just got a game that was a cartoony Doom 3, rather than the involved, transcendental action-RPG experience we were lead to expect.

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 8:23 AM

          Yup. I blame piracy. Piracy, regardless of how it actually affects sales, absolutely affects a game's value.

          When you have to save your money all week, or all month, just to buy a game, you appreciate the game a lot more. When you take it off the internet for free, every little glitch becomes a monumental justification for taking the game. It's this need to justify guilt that is making gaming websites a cesspool of derogatory comments by entitled, elitist snobs.

          • reply
            December 11, 2012 8:29 AM

            people on the internet are critical and bitchy about everything, do you think people were pirating Chipotle's yesterday

            • reply
              December 11, 2012 1:34 PM

              You think those people leaving those comments aren't downloading a shit-ton of free media when they're not posting about what food they don't like? Those are the same people I'm talking about. Entitled assholes that think they deserve better, even though they're not buying anything.

              • reply
                December 11, 2012 5:35 PM

                thats a pretty broad brush you're painting with lol

                • reply
                  December 13, 2012 8:32 AM

                  Stay focused - we're talking about a cultural movement. That requires a broad brush. If you want to talk personal decisions on a micro scale then that's another thing entirely.

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 1:08 PM

          Well deserved stars, Judas! Every reason to just let it be and not break down the meta here folks.

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 2:29 AM

      lol box art

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 6:25 AM

      Why does the PS3 box say "only on playstation"? Isn't that a straight-out lie?

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 6:39 AM

      Umm, who cares?
      I don't buy games for box art. I just want to play the game. Next article please. Jesus Christ!

      • reply
        December 11, 2012 6:44 AM

        Nobody gives a shit, they just want to get people talking about the game, mission accomplished.

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 6:44 AM

      People are complaining, because Bioshock isn't a generic franchise at all, yet its third installment gets a totally generic box art, admittedly designed to "appeal to the casual audience". That's just pathetic.

      On top of that the box art isn't only generic, but it looks outright awful.

      People care about this one particular game's box art so much, because it utterly mismatches the included content. At least that's what they believe and I do hope they're right.

      • reply
        December 11, 2012 7:25 AM

        yeah but why do you care

        • reply
          December 11, 2012 7:26 AM

          Or I should say, why are you really that outraged? I mean so they wanted to appeal to the kind of person who doesn't know how unique and awesome Bioshock is. That's fine. It's not like it affects the game at all.

          • reply
            December 11, 2012 11:21 AM

            I am not outraged at all. I think it's a really ugly cover and I buy boxed games for two reasons: to actually own a physical thing that I can easily install the game from at all times without being dependent on the internet and partially for some kind of collector's reason. I'm not really a collector of anything, but somehow I really like having videogames on shelves.

            You are right about it not affecting the game though. It's luckily true that the most important thing isn't disturbed by this, but that doesn't change the art being ugly. Even if it was designed to attract casuals to it, it is UGLY. xD

            However, should the game really be released like this, it won't keep me from buying it, that would be silly.

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 7:38 AM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 8:19 AM

      Ironically, I was in a fraternity in college that was full of dudes crazy excited about BioShock. Plenty of hardcore gamers in that group.

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 8:30 AM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      December 11, 2012 4:15 PM

      Once again dumbed down to the LCD. It is the kind of BS that ruins gaming. Oh and if I hear another dev go on and on about balance I will puke. Always taking what is fun for some and watering it down. No respect for the Hard Core gamer.

Hello, Meet Lola