Weekend Confirmed 136 - Medal of Honor: Warfighter, Forza Horizon
by Andrew Yoon, Oct 26, 2012 11:00am PDTHost Garnett Lee is back this week, with some disappointing revelations about Forza Horizon. But before that, Jeff Cannata "turns a corner" on the Wii U, talking up the possibilities of Nintendo TVii. Andrew Yoon rants about Medal of Honor: Warfighter, while special guest Andrea Rene gets passionate in this week's Tailgate.
Weekend Confirmed Ep. 136: 10/26/2012
Subscription Links:
- Subscribe to Weekend Confirmed in iTunes
- Weekend Confirmed is also available in the Zune Marketplace
- Subscribe to Weekend Confirmed via RSS
Here's a handy pop-up player so you can listen from right here on the page. Let us know how it works for you.
If you're viewing this in the GameFly application, you can play Weekend Confirmed Episode 136 directly.
Weekend Confirmed comes in four segments to make it easy to listen to in segments or all at once. Here's the timing for this week's episode:
Show Breakdown:
Round 1, Part 1 - 00:00:27 - 00:15:44
Round 1, Part 2 - 00:16:12 - 00:29:53
Whatcha Been Playin Part 1 - 00:30:42 - 01:01:41
Whatcha Been Playin Part 2 - 01:02:47 - 01:31:45
Listener Feedback/Front Page News - 01:32:15 - 02:03:55
Tailgate - 02:04:31 - 02:14:24
Follow the Weekend Confirmed crew on Twitter, too!
Weekend Confirmed @WeekendConfirmd
Garnett Lee @GarnettLee
Jeff Cannata @jeffcannata
Andrew Yoon @scxzor
Andrea Rene @AndreaRene
Remember to join the Official Facebook Weekend Confirmed Page and add us to your Facebook routine. We'll be keeping you up with the latest on the show there as well.
Original music in the show by Del Rio. Get his latest Album, Club Tipsy on iTunes. Check out more, including the Super Mega Worm mix and other mash-ups on his ReverbNation page or Facebook page, and follow him on twitter @delriomusic.
Wargame: Airland Battle trailer details dynamic campaign
Halo 'Bootcamp' confirmed by Microsoft
Weekend PC download deals: Tomb Raider for $14
Game Dev Tycoon studio outlines future plans
Baldur's Gate 2 Enhanced already has 350,000 words of new content




Comments
Last week I started a conversation that I had not prepared adequately for. I saw an image of Geoff Keighley between a Doritos and Mountain Dew display and thought to myself "well, that's a thing we definitely ought to talk about."
This image, though, was just a provocative header for an editorial about a situation where members of the games media were tweeting in hopes of winning a free PS3. The article then led to a larger discussion on the relationship between videogame PR and the people who cover the industry.
Though I fully expect to get raked mercilessly as is the Internet's way, I'm going to give a segment of the show to the subject this week. And then we're going to lay it to rest for a while.
So, I appreciate that tensions have run high, mean things have been said and feelings bruised.. We're going to set that aside. This thread is the place to add your voice to the discussion. I expect you know but just in case, if you come in hostile and aggressive there's not much chance of being heard. But if you're thoughtful, regardless your point of view, you're going to be part of the discussion.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 32 replies.
If things like that can happen, then game press are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Of course, the quickest way to stop something like that is for all game press to agree to stop being muscled around. Unfortunately, we don't live in a world where everyone is of the same integrity. Instead, we live in a world where it's a big freakin' deal when RE 6 gets a 6/10; even though, statistically speaking, it's still better than average. And it's also world where a guy can lose his job because he points out flaws in the system.
If allowed to evaluate games without worrying about losing out on coverage, the game press could actually function as a line of quality control in a way. They see these games when they are a work in progress. If a game has flaws, they can and should be able report on them. You know, instead of what happens now where most previews are just a writer doing the PR work for the PR people.
I don't ever see any of this actually happening, so complete transparency is the only real solution. As others have said, readers, listeners, viewers, etc. can then base their opinions on not just what they are seeing, but what filter they are getting it through.
You must be logged in to post.