• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

More Napster News

by Maarten Goldstein, Jun 14, 2000 7:22am PDT
Related Topics – RIAA

No, the subject is not dead yet! ;) More news from the people at Napster on Inside Music (Thanks Marc Molinaro of Gnutella News). It seems they screwed themselves, as the RIAA got ahold of some incriminating internal memos and e-mails from the company, in which Napster executives Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker said that while they told the RIAA Napster was created for 'putting up unsigned artists' , the memos show that it was a way 'to distract the RIAA'.

In the same memo, under the heading ''Problems,'' Parker describes several different strategies designed to ''put us in a much better bargaining position with the RIAA when they see that we are not just making pirated music available but also pushing demand.'' The key, Parker says, is to use the lure of free music ''to grow our user base, and then use (this) user base coupled with advanced technology to leverage the record companies into a deal.''
Meanwhile, the BCC is reporting that the recording industry has asked a court judge for a preliminary injunction to shut down the Napster service. Thanks KHeT. Interestingly enough, MP3.com is one of the allies of the recording industry now and is saying its harmful that files are being given away through Napster. update Steve: Check out what Courtney Love has to say about Napster.




Comments

128 Threads | 288 Comments


  • Dude the v2 was the best video card EVER released. Its not the fastest now but in terms of when it was released, how fast it was compared to everything else at the time, and how long it was the fastest card etc etc. Until the Geforce, the v2 STILL owned. It was faster than everything up until the tnt in which it was faster than but didnt do 32bit and 1024x768. I had both and actually used my v2 more, sure the tnt could do all that, but 32bit ran like shit and 1024x768 wasnt really playable so all the tnt was for me was a 2d card that gathered dust in my case. Then when ppl said omg the tnt can do 1024x768 then what. Scrape together 50 bucks, buy another one and watch your 1yr old card tear up the new boy on the market. Hell the tnt2 may have been faster but it wasnt $200 bucks faster than the v2. :)

    Actually nvidia started with the hype because the v2 wasnt overhyped at all. It did everything it said it would do. Of course we know the hype nvidia started with that 1600x1200 @ 30fps shit the original tnt was supposed to have.

    Hell I got a geforce when they came out but I keep my sli v2's in there just because they STILL kick ass. When I start running outta pci slots maybe I'll take one out but until then they will STAY in my system.






  • I suppose what is good, or bad is subjective at this point.

    I just take issue with the fact that so many people seem to think mp3 is just as good as a CD, when it isn't even close.

    Not that I don't use mp3's, I do, and the sound quality isn't so bad that I want to go back to the inconvience of a CD player, but lets not kid ourselves here, it's still a tradeoff.
    Allot of times the tradeoff isn't worth it, and at times like that, the CD-player comes on.

    As for that wannabe intellectual crap, fuck off. I don't put any thought into how I speak (type), I just speak. If you think I'm going out of my way to use 'big words', I guess thats pretty telling.



  • Geez, everybody is so sure they know what they are talking about, after all "It sounds good to me dude!".

    Have any of you ever really compared a CD recorded song with an mp3? They don't sound 'awesome', it clearly doesnt sound the same no matter how high you sample the audio.

    Let me explain why. Mp3 works by selecting certain parts of the music that it feels is not needed, and removing it. What is removes is based on information learned in a field of science known as psychoaucostics, which basically is the study of how the human hearing system perceives sound. Now in theory, your brain discards a great deal of the information that you hear due to it not being needed, and mp3 works by trying to do this work beforehand in exactly the same way that your brain would so that it will be the same thing you would have heard anyways. Unfortunately it doesnt work exactly right. First biggest problem is that wetware bio systems like ourselves simply don't opperate -exactly-. In other words, not everyones hearing system will do this task in exactly the same way, so there is no 'one perfect system' that would apply to each and every person. Now that is even if it were -possible- to exactly replicate this behavior in software, which it isn't.

    Admittedly, mp3 does a really good job. It is remarkably close considering the amount of data it is discarding, but it is not perfect.
    However it IS close enough to fool the masses, and since it 'samples' at 128bits, which is the same as a CD, then everyone and their mom says its just as good as CD, which it isn't.


  • If you can't tell that most mp3's are noticeably worse than cd's you either have a bad sound system or bad ears. Although some music does transfer over to mp3 format much better than others.

    If you are comparing mp3 vs. redbook audio over computer speakers, it is pretty hard to tell the difference. This is primarily due to the fact that most pc sound cards either have a bad DAC, or pick up noise from the computer. Usually both. Not to mention computer speakers suck for frequency response. With headphones, it is still pretty difficult, because the sound cards typically crank out such crappy audio. If you go to digital out, it makes it alot easier to compare.

    Things get much better if mp3's are encoded at about 192kbits, but most people don't encode up in that range, although with hard drive space so cheap these days, I don't see why.

    I have most of my cd collection encoded, something like 2600 songs and it fits under 10 gigs. You can get a 45 gig drive for like $250 these days.

    Oh, and damn! Courtney made Lars look relatively retarded. I have newfound respect for her. She is the first musician I have heard speak out on this stuff with an intelligent perspective. It doesn't hurt that she quoted my current favorite author though (Neal Stephenson).

    Guess I'll crawl back to coding now after procrastinating so long.

    Andy

    --Oh and if you don't agree with me, you are just wrong. :)




  • The underlying mechanics are a bit different, but in application, it is the same...

    Exactly. It's a slightly more difficult interface.. much more discouraging than Napster is. I mean, picture your 48 year old blonde cousing who is 47% plastic, picking through your computer because she heard of some "Napster" thing on Television. And when she get's to it she can actually use it.

    I don't want to see the vast majority of American's with sub-par intelligence levels causing a huge ordeal and then complaining about it for everyone to see. Napster was fine when "normal" geeks and |337 h4x0rs used it because of the small amount of people and the not-so-famous reputation. Mostly high-bandwidth users who had a lot of mp3's anyways. And then comes the onslaught of AOL'ers and modemers to clog up the internet and complain about lag and cause a big scene.

    Not to judge the intelligence of any particular band *coughMETALLICAcough* but I don't think that they normally would have noticed a thing like that unless it was made a huge ordeal by something. Keeping on top of the internet doesn't seem to fit their bio.

    I don't know. Maybe it just makes me feel stupid. Or maybe you're just a stupid person defending themself *doubtfull*. But whatever.
    Just admit it:
    -Napster is easy to use.
    -Had it not been for its ease of use, it's popularity would not have occured
    -Simple minded users of Napster cause a big deal
    -Big deal annoys everyone becuase this is old shit. Pirating of mp3's has existed for longer than most of these people had their computers.

    The fact that the mp3 is widely popular is fine, the fact that all of a sudden after all these years, it is viewed as a threat is ridiculous. We saw it from the begining.

    This whole Napster thing is stupid. It just gets annoying.


    Dopeman
    (the server's are different too.. the way you connect that is)








  • I was in Suncoast Video the other day, talking about DVD's with a friend of mine, and the sales clerk came up and started talking about all of the wonders of DVD's. Somewhere in his stream of garbage, he said something to the effect of "and as soon as DVD's become more widespread, they'll drop in price a lot, since they're cheaper to manufacture."

    DING DING DING!

    Bells go off in my head. I'd remember hearing that same line when CD's first started appearing on the shelves. The $15-$20 price range will be replaced with $7 discs as soon as the manufacturing becomes cheaper, right?

    We all know the rest of the story.