More Napster News
by Maarten Goldstein, Jun 14, 2000 7:22am PDTNo, the subject is not dead yet! ;) More news from the people at Napster on Inside Music (Thanks Marc Molinaro of Gnutella News). It seems they screwed themselves, as the RIAA got ahold of some incriminating internal memos and e-mails from the company, in which Napster executives Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker said that while they told the RIAA Napster was created for 'putting up unsigned artists' , the memos show that it was a way 'to distract the RIAA'.
In the same memo, under the heading ''Problems,'' Parker describes several different strategies designed to ''put us in a much better bargaining position with the RIAA when they see that we are not just making pirated music available but also pushing demand.'' The key, Parker says, is to use the lure of free music ''to grow our user base, and then use (this) user base coupled with advanced technology to leverage the record companies into a deal.''Meanwhile, the BCC is reporting that the recording industry has asked a court judge for a preliminary injunction to shut down the Napster service. Thanks KHeT. Interestingly enough, MP3.com is one of the allies of the recording industry now and is saying its harmful that files are being given away through Napster. update Steve: Check out what Courtney Love has to say about Napster.
Daily Filter: Tiger Woods PGA Tour 13: The Masters, Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion
Dear Esther Mac port confirmed
Killing Floor hits a million sales, discounted on Steam
Jam Live Music Arcade announced for PS3, Xbox 360
Metal Gear Online to quietly die this summer
Comments
BH
Actually nvidia started with the hype because the v2 wasnt overhyped at all. It did everything it said it would do. Of course we know the hype nvidia started with that 1600x1200 @ 30fps shit the original tnt was supposed to have.
Hell I got a geforce when they came out but I keep my sli v2's in there just because they STILL kick ass. When I start running outta pci slots maybe I'll take one out but until then they will STAY in my system.
Sure you cant tell when your listening to music with your shitty comp USA speakers, or the $150 bookshelf stereo you bought at wal-mart, but anybody with a good ear for music knows it's ass.
As for this whole 'Napster sucks because it makes it too easy', bullshit. Thats just a dumb elitist attitude, blah. I remember thinking the same thing back when mIRC came out, us oldschool ircii users were sure it was going to ruin IRC be allowing a bunch of fucking morons on... uhh.. hrm, maybe thats not the best example.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Look, I have a high-end home audio system (NAD components, Polk and Klipsch speakers) so I know good sound and mp3's sound very good.
Again, if they didn't why would the RIAA even give half a shit?
To sit back and act like you know more than everybody else is laughable. Especially you, jidar, you wanna-be intellectual.
Umm, algorithm, there I said a big word, duh. (my impersonation of the dumbass known as jidar)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
I just take issue with the fact that so many people seem to think mp3 is just as good as a CD, when it isn't even close.
Not that I don't use mp3's, I do, and the sound quality isn't so bad that I want to go back to the inconvience of a CD player, but lets not kid ourselves here, it's still a tradeoff.
Allot of times the tradeoff isn't worth it, and at times like that, the CD-player comes on.
As for that wannabe intellectual crap, fuck off. I don't put any thought into how I speak (type), I just speak. If you think I'm going out of my way to use 'big words', I guess thats pretty telling.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Have any of you ever really compared a CD recorded song with an mp3? They don't sound 'awesome', it clearly doesnt sound the same no matter how high you sample the audio.
Let me explain why. Mp3 works by selecting certain parts of the music that it feels is not needed, and removing it. What is removes is based on information learned in a field of science known as psychoaucostics, which basically is the study of how the human hearing system perceives sound. Now in theory, your brain discards a great deal of the information that you hear due to it not being needed, and mp3 works by trying to do this work beforehand in exactly the same way that your brain would so that it will be the same thing you would have heard anyways. Unfortunately it doesnt work exactly right. First biggest problem is that wetware bio systems like ourselves simply don't opperate -exactly-. In other words, not everyones hearing system will do this task in exactly the same way, so there is no 'one perfect system' that would apply to each and every person. Now that is even if it were -possible- to exactly replicate this behavior in software, which it isn't.
Admittedly, mp3 does a really good job. It is remarkably close considering the amount of data it is discarding, but it is not perfect.
However it IS close enough to fool the masses, and since it 'samples' at 128bits, which is the same as a CD, then everyone and their mom says its just as good as CD, which it isn't.
If you are comparing mp3 vs. redbook audio over computer speakers, it is pretty hard to tell the difference. This is primarily due to the fact that most pc sound cards either have a bad DAC, or pick up noise from the computer. Usually both. Not to mention computer speakers suck for frequency response. With headphones, it is still pretty difficult, because the sound cards typically crank out such crappy audio. If you go to digital out, it makes it alot easier to compare.
Things get much better if mp3's are encoded at about 192kbits, but most people don't encode up in that range, although with hard drive space so cheap these days, I don't see why.
I have most of my cd collection encoded, something like 2600 songs and it fits under 10 gigs. You can get a 45 gig drive for like $250 these days.
Oh, and damn! Courtney made Lars look relatively retarded. I have newfound respect for her. She is the first musician I have heard speak out on this stuff with an intelligent perspective. It doesn't hurt that she quoted my current favorite author though (Neal Stephenson).
Guess I'll crawl back to coding now after procrastinating so long.
Andy
--Oh and if you don't agree with me, you are just wrong. :)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSHeyMartha0006/11_one.html
I really like their explanation for banning email use. Heh.
*cough*
What?
Exactly. It's a slightly more difficult interface.. much more discouraging than Napster is. I mean, picture your 48 year old blonde cousing who is 47% plastic, picking through your computer because she heard of some "Napster" thing on Television. And when she get's to it she can actually use it.
I don't want to see the vast majority of American's with sub-par intelligence levels causing a huge ordeal and then complaining about it for everyone to see. Napster was fine when "normal" geeks and |337 h4x0rs used it because of the small amount of people and the not-so-famous reputation. Mostly high-bandwidth users who had a lot of mp3's anyways. And then comes the onslaught of AOL'ers and modemers to clog up the internet and complain about lag and cause a big scene.
Not to judge the intelligence of any particular band *coughMETALLICAcough* but I don't think that they normally would have noticed a thing like that unless it was made a huge ordeal by something. Keeping on top of the internet doesn't seem to fit their bio.
I don't know. Maybe it just makes me feel stupid. Or maybe you're just a stupid person defending themself *doubtfull*. But whatever.
Just admit it:
-Napster is easy to use.
-Had it not been for its ease of use, it's popularity would not have occured
-Simple minded users of Napster cause a big deal
-Big deal annoys everyone becuase this is old shit. Pirating of mp3's has existed for longer than most of these people had their computers.
The fact that the mp3 is widely popular is fine, the fact that all of a sudden after all these years, it is viewed as a threat is ridiculous. We saw it from the begining.
This whole Napster thing is stupid. It just gets annoying.
Dopeman
(the server's are different too.. the way you connect that is)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 1 replies.
Dopeman
Aside from the fact that the writer of the program was called nappy -due to his funky weave- and therefore he named his program Napster.
And then wrapster?
Please.
This was a small tool that became overly used by the public due to its ease and simple interface. Type in the song you want, and download. Most of the users are on a modem line too, which means that they don't often worry about ping times. High-bandwidth users worry more about those things, as modem speeds are unacceptable.
I'm just saying, that when an old geezer (aight, 40 is not geezer, but getting there) who apparantly is some AOL user knows about Napster and willingly confronts a kid about it in a electronic/appliance/music/whatever store.. it's just wrong. That's like giving a powerfull tool to a child, who only knows how to use it a certain way. And now that everyone knows about it, it only gets worse. Time to find a napster alternative people. And the ones who never used it to start with, are only better off.
Gnutella might not be as efficient as Napster, but it sure as hell takes a little more skill to use than Napster does. Skill being something that an average AOL user would not have.
Dopeman
(not so skilled, but maybe.. just maybe)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Let's put it this way. If you took AOL and made them a REAL isp and gave them all high-speed ethernet connections, what would that be like?
To have a bunch of simpletons unleashed on the raw internet. What would that be like?
I have no clique, I am just some over-opinionated kid with time to argue a point. I'm just sick of this Napster shit.
Dopeman
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
I can accept stupid people, you can't really
blame them, but at least realize you're so
fucking dumb and shut the fuck up. Geez.
2/100
DING DING DING!
Bells go off in my head. I'd remember hearing that same line when CD's first started appearing on the shelves. The $15-$20 price range will be replaced with $7 discs as soon as the manufacturing becomes cheaper, right?
We all know the rest of the story.
when i search nothing comes up. i wait for like, two minutes and it doesnt do shit.
My reply: "Napster is a public tool for simple minded people to get a hold of popular music. I have already have this CD on Mp3, and I like it so much that I will support the Artist by buying it."
CD you asK? Dj Micro Tech Mix-2000 Mooshine records.
I like techno. sue me.
Dopeman
(not that this has to do with anything. but napster is getting to annoying.)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Yes you are simple minded for using it, but it doesn't mean that its wrong. Fucking faggot.
Again, how do you think I got the CD before I bought it?
There are more L337 ways to apprehend Mp3's like through Gnutella and such, but for pure efficiency and speed I use Napster sometimes. That is all.
No need to get your panties in a wad.
Dopeman
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Also, no more good music. Only pre-fabricated, manufactured, injection molded, cookie cutter pop boy and girl bands.
Mwahahahahah.
-THE MAN
Keeping the little guy down for over 5,000 years of recorded history
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
Napster: It's all legal. They made a system that could have been used legitimately, but wasn't, and this was no fault of their own. It is impossible to tell if the music in an mp3 is somehow a violation of copyright. Filtering against filename is dumb for 2 reasons: 1. There is no central 'list' of copyrighted material available to reference. 2. Its nowhere near accurate enough; not only can you change a name to get around it, but you will catch stuff that has the same name but is being freely distributed. For instance, if you ban the word 'Metallica' what happens when I want to download a song called 'Metallica Sucks" by "Lars Hater"? Hrm.. thats not fair...
In short, a music sharing system like Napster "COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE" that would have pleased everyone.
If you think so, what could they have done smart guys?
Ok.. lets approach this a different way, what -exactly- did Napster do that was illegal? All you guys who seem to know everything can never answer that one can you?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 14 replies.
You are an ass
WTf.
Limp is a band.
Dopeman
Dopeman
(likes that word)
...
``We believe that these kinds of distribution schemes will become increasingly common as the music and movie industries realize the kind of threat they are under,'' said Rob Enderle, an Internet industry analyst at Giga Information Group in Santa Clara.
- http://www.sjmercury.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/038459.htm
slowly but surely they're getting it. :)
Thanks!
Now shut the fuck up