Rage PC system requirements revealed

The minimum and recommended system requirements for id Software's upcoming title Rage have been revealed.

23

Rage, the latest title from famed developer id Software, is set to launch on the PC, Xbox 360, and PlayStation 3 on October 4. Chances are, if you're a hardcore Shacker, you're thinking about getting the game for the PC.

The minimum and recommended system requirements for the game were revealed earlier today, reminding us of two things we almost forgot about: our PCs need more RAM and Windows Vista is still a thing.

    Minimum:

  • OS: Win XP SP3, Vista, Win 7

  • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo or Equivalent AMD

  • Memory: 2GB

  • Hard Disk Space: 25GB

  • Video Card: GeForce 8800, Radeon HD 4200

    Recommended:

  • OS: Win XP SP3, Vista, Win 7

  • Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad or Equivalent AMD

  • Memory: 4GB

  • Hard Disk Space: 25GB

  • Video Card: GeForce 9800 GTX, ATI Radeon HD 5550

The announcement was made earlier today on the Bethesda Blog. The blog also reminds gamers that on the PC, Rage will use Steamworks to support Achievements, VOIP, and friends lists on the PC, meaning it will require Steam to be installed on your PC.

Xav de Matos was previously a games journalist creating content at Shacknews.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    September 6, 2011 4:00 PM

    Xav de Matos posted a new article, Rage PC system requirements revealed.

    The minimum and recommended system requirements for id Software's upcoming title Rage have been revealed.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:05 PM

      Those recommended specs are much lower than expected

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 5:42 PM

        Agreed, especially for the Radeon cards. Unless there is some kind of mistake, this must be a very well optimized game.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 6:12 PM

        Yeah that's what I'm thinking too, my PC crushes those specs.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 8:02 PM

        It runs at an uninterrupted 60fps on consoles, so PC specs shouldn't be as high as we're expecting. It seems like a lot of the budget went towards craptons of textures rather of loads of effects and lots of geometry.

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 3:28 AM

        This is screaming "I'm a bad console port". Not what I was expecting from this dev, I was expecting something to actually challenge my system. Fuck, I have an old wasting away box in my garaged that is 8 years old covered in dust that meets the recommended specs. This is why consoles are ruining the PC market. Yesterday's tech at today's inflation! woohoo!!

        • reply
          September 7, 2011 5:33 AM

          We should still trust id to do the PC right at least until we play Rage, no reason not too.

        • reply
          September 7, 2011 7:42 AM

          It's ID, John Carmack.... DOOM, this game has to be PC-centric. You would be surprised at the power of the hardware listed here. I have an 8800GTS and it has been able to handle everything I've thrown at it.

        • reply
          September 7, 2011 8:31 AM

          I wish there was a a way to force FPPs to join regular chatty for a while so we can educate them.

        • reply
          September 8, 2011 8:37 PM

          Quite the opposite, actually. If a game needs 10x the PC hardware to run like it does on consoles, shit wasn't optimized at all.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:25 PM

      But can I play it with a light-gun? I'm pretty sure I saw it being played with a light gun.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 6:45 PM

        Fully endorsed by Jesse Pinkman.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:25 PM

      I know this is a dumb question but seeing as how I only have a laptop at the moment I was wondering if my video card could run rage. I currently have a geforce gtx 460m installed

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 4:27 PM

        Oh yeah. You'll do fantastic.

        • reply
          September 6, 2011 4:32 PM

          nice thanks bro. that makes me more excited to play the game

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:47 PM

      Oh, John Carmack. I don't know how you got so good at coding, but this is a damn impressive looking game for those recommended specs, if they're accurate.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:53 PM

      The 25gigs of space it eats is the only real painful thing.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 5:08 PM

        What's that cost, $2-3?

        • reply
          September 6, 2011 5:14 PM

          HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO AFFORD THAT!?!
          It does make me glad I'm not downloading it though.

        • reply
          September 6, 2011 11:29 PM

          Not if you have an SSD.

          • reply
            September 7, 2011 3:27 PM

            I don't understand why anyone has an SSD at this point in time, considering the cost and how little they're capable of holding compared to modern HDDs.

            • reply
              September 7, 2011 5:06 PM

              They are insanely quick. Really the best upgrade you can get if you have a half decent system but no ssd.

              • reply
                September 7, 2011 7:49 PM

                Speed doesn't mean anything when you don't have enough room for your games.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 6:17 PM

        Agreed.

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 6:26 PM

        Yeah, have to decide which of my tb drives to install it to

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 8:58 AM

        MEGABIGTEXTURES

      • reply
        September 8, 2011 11:32 PM

        That's a price I will gladly pay.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 4:59 PM

      Well, I meet the minimum. That's good. I have a i7 920, 8GB DDR3, and an OC'd 4850. I need to upgrade my video card, obviously. I'm actually hoping to buy a new video card when Rage is released and maybe get the game for free as a tie-in deal, but I don't want to spend a lot. Under 200. :-/

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 5:09 PM

        Might I suggest the 560ti?

        • reply
          September 6, 2011 6:00 PM

          If the recommended specs are correct, it seems that ATi cards will perform a slight beat better than the Nvidia counterpart. However, an Nvidia 8800 paired with an ATi 4200.... 8800 is decent but the 4200 (or even 4300's) are purely for multimedia.

          Personally, I run an ATi 4870 along with an Nvidia 9800GT for Hybrid PhysX and they run most games in conjunction with a Phenom II X6.

          If your money is tight, I'd say just crossfire the 4850.

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 11:33 AM

        Maybe Minecraft will be bundled in :)

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 7:32 PM

        You are above the recommended settings.
        An HD4850 more or less has the same performance as an HD5750, which of course is more powerful than an HD5550.
        Paired with that CPU and that amount of RAM you will have no problems :)

      • reply
        September 8, 2011 5:46 AM

        I read that as an excuse to pretend to be modest while waving your E-Peen about your i7. You know you are well above the recommended, attention seeker methinks.

        • reply
          September 8, 2011 12:41 PM

          The processor is a generation old from 2008, but I'm not worried about the CPU or the RAM (which I misreported - I actually have 12GB), but when I built my system I bought a cheap video card instead of buying top of the line, and its definitely starting to show its age. I always thought I would upgrade it mid-life of the system which is about now.

          I don't know.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 5:47 PM

      There's no multi-player to this besides some car combat right?

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 5:58 PM

        There are coop missions (FPS)

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 7:28 PM

      25GB of HDD??? wow, hmm time to start uninstalling stuff me thinks :)

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 7:44 PM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 5:35 AM

        If I had a dollar for every time a game claimed it needed at least 40% more disk space than it actually needs, I'd probably have a few thousand dollars.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 7:59 PM

      OMG multiple floppies DVD's

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 8:08 PM

        I think it'll be one dvd and then itll uncompress into a behemoth.

        • reply
          September 6, 2011 8:44 PM

          So basically it'll turn into a big ol' Rube Goldberg machine inside my computer? Awesome!

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 8:08 PM

      guess I'm gonna need a bigger ssd

      • reply
        September 8, 2011 8:39 PM

        Yeah. I wanted to only buy a 128 GB SSD, but I knew I'd have to swap around games constantly, so I went with 250 GB instead (€450 for a bloody hard-disk, but it was worth it, it's so fast :)).

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 8:28 PM

      Holy Shit! It's fucking Borderlands!

      • reply
        September 6, 2011 8:36 PM

        Rage is fucking Borderlands? I don't think it sinks to that level.

      • reply
        September 8, 2011 11:33 PM

        Your memory of Borderlands is generous, to say the least.

    • reply
      September 6, 2011 8:51 PM

      Is that Colonel Campbell from Metal Gear Solid?

      • reply
        September 7, 2011 1:01 AM

        Paul Eiding, yes. But the model looks like "look who's talking" face from Total Recall.

    • reply
      September 7, 2011 9:31 AM

      Damn I can't wait, Its been too long since we had an ID FPS

    • reply
      September 7, 2011 11:32 AM

      How will this degrade to xbox? :(

Hello, Meet Lola