• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

A Look At V5-6000

by Steve Gibson, May 28, 2000 7:08am PDT
Related Topics – 3dfx

After the big goofup at 3dfx with the Voodoo5-5500 delay there is a lot of speculation going around on if the V5-6000 monster will actually ship within the next few months. As most people probably remember the delay between the V3-3000 and V3-3500 was fumbled a bit and took quite a while. Well, according to 3dfx all other products are "still on schedule". That being the case, then we should be seeing the V5-6000 boards by this time next month. The word 3dfx was giving at E3 (according to Anandtech) was June 15th. While you are pondering that crazy $599 price tag you might want to have a look at this Tech-Report article which gives one of the most accurate looks at the technology Ive seen.

Mtexels/sec Bus Width Memory Bandwidth
GeForce2 1600 128bits 32mb(or64) 5.2GB/sec
V5-5500 667 128bits *2 32mb *2 5.2GB/sec
V5-6000 1333 128bits *4 32mb *4 10.4GB/sec
Now, looking at the benchmarks/comparisons between the GeForce2 and V5-5500, (example chart)the GF2 has more than double the MTexels/second fill rate of the V5-5500. If the fill rate were the bottleneck/limiting factor then you would expect the GF2 to come out with framerates of approx double. Bummer though, that isnt the case. Memory bandwidth is becoming more of an issue. How fast will the V5-6000 be? Really tough to tell. 3dfx isnt exactly known for stellar OpenGL drivers. I saw it running at WinHEC a little while back and my professional opinion is 'fast'.




Comments

117 Threads* | 223 Comments*


  • I'll bet all you people that are praising the GeForce 2, and announcing the voodoo 5's demise, have never seen the voodoo 5 in action. I have, and I will never go back to non FSAA ever again. And for everyone that says it takes too much of a performance hit, you're wrong. I've seen and played several games on the Voodoo 5 and it is frigging awesome. Once you've played for awhile with FSAA, you'll never go back. And for those that say GeForce 2 offers FSAA support in it's drivers, you're kidding yourselves. nVidia has got a fast card with the GeForce 2, but it does not have the FSAA going on yet. Heck, they only added support for it because 3dfx made such a big deal about the advantages of it. If you only play quake 3, then by all means get the GeForce 2 because it's faster, but for any other game it rules.


    *not trying to start flame war, just pointing out that people haven't seen V5 for themselves, therefore making it unreasonable for them to judge the card's merits*



  • Hey I've seen the V5 running some games, also in FSAA and here are my conclusions:

    - FSAA causes a MAJOR performance hit, most games become unplayable.
    - image quality looks washed out and blurry.
    - mipmap slider is NOWHERE TO BE FOUND (oh yeah, they MIGHT add it in some FUTURE drivers, what good does it do me in the MEANTIME??? Fuck that!)
    - the 2D image is just above average.
    - in 99% of all tests the GF2 is MUCH faster!
    - the card is big and it gets pretty HOT!
    - it doesn't overclock worth shit.
    - some games showed texture trashing!
    - a couple of times the system froze in games!

    Hmm...good enough reason to massively RECALL this flawed card I guess.

    >>D.