Rumor: Slant Six was working on Medal of Honor Vita game
Simpsons, King of the Hill writer joins Angry Birds film
Class of Heroes 2 coming to PSN on June 4
Shelter gameplay trailer is delightful, horrifying
Alan Wake Humble Bundle launches
Battlefield 4 producer says single-player should feel 'autonomous'
Indie dev to Microsoft: Be more like Sony on self-publishing
Call of Duty: Ghosts video compares graphics to Modern Warfare 3
Backward compatability is 'backwards' strategy, says Microsoft
Mortal Kombat 'Komplete' coming to PC
Morning Discussion
by Xav de Matos, Jan 25, 2011 5:00am PSTVacation's over. I really enjoyed my time away from work, exploring some of the great spots buried within Chicago. It was a hectic time in the city due to the face-off between the Bears and the Pack. It didn't turn out well for Bears fans.
What did turn out well was Never Not Funny, live at the Congress Theater. The show was hilarious as usual, Daver sang the theme and the crew sang along at the end. As an added bonus, I had the pleasure of meeting the crew. What a classy group of gentlemen.
Well, it's back to work for me. Next time I'll be sure to remember to take more than two days off. Maybe.
Is there a Pareto optimum in the chicken game? If so then I'm havning trouble understanding pareto optimums -- they are supposed to be where no other outcome makes anyone worse, right?
If so, then in:
1,1 | 4,2
2,4 | 3,3
i know that the nash is 2,4 and 4,2, but which would be pareto? 3,3? that wouldnt make sense because then you're worsening someone in 2,4 and 4,2, right? and 2,4/4,2 cant be because then you're worsening someone from the position of 3,3.
(that or im totally confused!)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 24 replies.
It's kinda hard to get in to - or I haven't found a good newbie intro to help explain the syntax used. I know the prisoners dilema well, same as the chicken game. I just can't comprehend what the syntax actually means yet :(
Looks like a fascinating area of study.
You must be logged in to post.