Morning Discussion

by Alice O'Connor, Jan 14, 2011 5:00am PST

I'm still catching up on my Inter-reading, and beginning to suspect that people are in fact writing new things all the time, so here's another wodge of links for you this rainy/snowy/dry/damp/wet/hot/cold/sleety/arid/scorching Friday/Saturday.

A collection of Czech and Polish posters for Godzilla and other Japanese monster movies. They're very stylish and cool, though 'Son of Godzilla' is curiously unsettling.

Branding blog Brand New takes a look at THQ's new logo and concludes that while there are a few problems, "it is a bold improvement over the previous one."

A video trip down the London sewers, complete with gawping at fatbergs and sniffing out how posh an area is. Pleasant lunchtime viewing.

Telephones ruin society, Wondermark discovered. Not your 'iPouch' or whatever it is you crazy kids gush over, but those old wired telephones (you don't believe me but these genuinely did exist). Back in 1889. It's been downhill since then, we can all agree.

Read all the News

« Previous Story
Bulletstorm Demo Hitting Xbox 360 & PS3 This Month

Next Story »
F.E.A.R. 3 U.K. Collector's Edition Includes Creepy Statue

See All Comments | 276 Threads | 6,548 Comments

#4201

Refresh Thread

By: sgtsanity x Show Full Post

Reply

Unsurprisingly, Google Chrome releases a FAQ about dropping h.264 that doesn't actually answer any of the tough questions and dances around the F-word.

http://blog.chromium.org/2011/01/more-about-chrome-html-video-codec.html

Jan 14, 2011 12:26pm PST

toggle
Unsurprisingly, Google Chrome releases a FAQ about dropping h.264 that doesn't actually answer any of the... : sgtsanity
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 202 replies.
- toggle
  Which F-word is that? : Haxim
  - toggle
    Flaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : BouillonCubes
    - toggle
      flange? : electroly
      
      toggle
      hey FRINGE is on a week from today! : dirge23
      
      i can confirm the google blog says not one word about this. i am incensed : electroly
      
      Fffffffriday! : BouillonCubes
  - foible : c0bra
  - i for one am glad that the usage of the word "fig" is down 20% this year. : kbnerd
  - FUPA : hirez
  - Fh.ITA : Hemtroll
  - fuuuuuudggggggggeee : CapnChaos
  - Flupa : Nitrium
  - fallopian : mrwolf710
  - Featherstonehaugh (pronounced 'fanshaw') : GreatGooglyMoogly
- toggle
  they dropped it because its a closed source codec that you will still be able to use with flash. they wa... : harold.johnson
- toggle
  why can you not accept that they have their own agenda, as does everyone else? however they want to ju... : dopeman
  - toggle
    Because they're acting like they're saints and saying that it's all for "openness", while it's actually a... : stuka
- toggle
  why can you not accept that they have their own agenda, as does everyone else? however they want to ju... : dopeman
  - It's possible their agenda is entirely noble; an agenda nonetheless. : jim bone
- H.264 support was ultimately futile anyway because there was no way Opera or Firefox would ever budge on ... : mikecyb
- toggle
  I bet apple will never support webM and insist they support html 5 in every way possible. : thecatinthehat
  - unless WebM is in the HTML5 spec (which it isn't) they are supporting it : mikecyb
- toggle
  All of you guys buying into Google's bullshit, consider these points: 1- Why did they need to remove it? : stuka
- toggle
  Firefox, the most used browser in Europe*, does not support h264 (without a plugin) and never will. Chro... : MamiyaOtaru
  - toggle
    it's not like websites are going to just stop encoding h264 because googles dropped official support for ... : harold.johnson
    - toggle
      you just have to serve chrome the flash that you already showed (mostly) everyone else as it is. Thats it... : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      So if Google is really all about pushing WebM and <video> into "first class" territory, and if openness i... : BouillonCubes
      
      how many times do people have to draw the distinction between a plugin and something in the source of the... : harold.johnson
      
      Maybe they are not "all about that". Instead maybe they are about pushing WebM and <video into "first cl... : jim bone
      
      toggle
      FLASH IS A PLUGIN. h.264 was INTEGRATED. h.264 is no longer integrated as PART of the browser. Flash i... : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      When are they going to remove mp3 from the browser? : BouillonCubes
      
      but who was phone? : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      when they can go back in time 15 years and introduce ogg before mp3 had already become totally defacto fo... : harold.johnson
      
      toggle
      Yea but mp3 is closed and the <audio> tag should be first class too. : BouillonCubes
      
      toggle
      There's not nearly so much author and consumer interest in web audio as web video. I think this may be a... : Zero|DPX
      
      BREAKING NEWS: Google Chrome dev claims MP3 support to possibly be removed in future iterations of Chrome... : Goto10
      
      Also if you would suddenly be happy with removing <audio> too then surely starting with <video> is a good... : indosauros
      
      toggle
      Plugin/integrated issues aside. It's pretty reasonable to not want to break widely-used existing functio... : jim bone
      
      Anything explicity serving h.264 is retarded anyway, and chances are had a flash bypass. So now it just s... : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      One is a technology that is not yet integrated into mainstream web. Dropping h.264 has nearly zero effec... : indosauros
      
      toggle
      Understandable but why haven't they taken the openness thing all the way by removing mp3 and whatever els... : BouillonCubes
      
      While we are at it, lets just remove gifs and jpgs as well! : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      Why do they have to take it all the way? : jim bone
      
      toggle
      Are all browsers planning on supporting WebM? : Goto10
      
      firefox, opera, chrome : harold.johnson
      
      toggle
      IE9 is, Safari is thru quicktime, chrome obviously is, firefox is. Opera is the only one I am unsure o... : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      Opera is, built in. : Zero|DPX
      
      toggle
      See, I don't keep up with all of this bullshit. What about devices, these would work fine on the iPhone'... : Goto10
      
      no ramifications for Hulu or Netflix because they will never use the <video> tag : electroly
      
      toggle
      Hulu and Netflix HAVE to use a separate container simply for the DRM. HTML5 cant do that AT ALL. So they ... : YerMothah
      
      toggle
      Starting to make sense, starting to make sense, thanks guys. Still not seeing a big deal, but I don't do... : Goto10
      
      #5191
      
      Refresh Thread
      
      By: Zero|DPX x Show Full Post
      
      Reply
      
      In the short term it will not make web development any easier. In the long term it will also not matter unless you're doing something with video encoding, in which case the jury is out:
      
      * Because Firefox/Opera were never going to support h.264, distributing <video> using h.264 was never going to be a universal solution. It's possible that distributing <video> with WebM will be a universal solution if Safari and IE adopt it and mobile devices ship hardware decoding of it.
      * If the above doesn't happen, then authors might be stuck forever either dual-encoding to h.264 and VP8 or dual-delivering h.264 via <video> and Flash.
      
      I can't see any way that Google's move makes the first option less likely. It is unclear how much more likely it makes it. This depends very much on the next couple years of negotiations and plans.
      
      Jan 14, 2011 1:59pm PST
      
      toggle
      In the short term it will not make web development any easier. In the long term it will also not matter : Zero|DPX
      
      this is really the bottom line and every future thread about this topic should start with a link to this ... : indosauros
      
      toggle
      I'm very curious to see how WebM hardware acceleration in mobile devices shakes out. Everything, Android ... : Serpico74
      
      I have no idea. I think if it were already really likely to happen Google wouldn't have needed to make t... : Zero|DPX
      
      toggle
      Here is the advantage from where I"m standing. Adopting h.264 for desktop browsers could have unified the... : Serpico74
      
      toggle
      The problem with this is that Firefox was never going to adopt h.264 and Firefox is big enough to matter ... : Zero|DPX
      
      toggle
      Absolutely. I suppose I hoped against hope that Firefox would eventually cave in. That and I don't use Fi... : Serpico74
      
      Exactly, for most people this move changes nothing at all for the next year or two. That is why I wrote ... : Zero|DPX
      
      and I dont know how I wrote quicktime. I meant silverlight. : YerMothah
      
      Just an FYI, Netflix and other companies are trying to hash out a standard that would enable DRM-supporte... : Danny5225
      
      Don't try to pretend that anyone who is not excited about Googles move is just a Steve Jobs drone. It's ... : BouillonCubes
      
      Right now the iPhone and iPad support h.264 and not Flash. Now that hardware VP8 decoding has just bec... : Zero|DPX
      
      As others have mentioned, some of them are. I object to his suggestion that Google ought to go "all th... : jim bone
      
      toggle
      ^^^ This is correct, FWIW. Why does Flash suck? Because it's closed and developed solely by Adobe who : Zero|DPX
      
      toggle
      Anyone can code a h.264 encoder or decoder, and did! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X264 (It also hap : sgtsanity
      
      toggle
      You're making a critical assumption, which is that before this move, there was somehow any chance at all ... : Zero|DPX
      
      toggle
      There were already work-arounds for Firefox based on the operating system itself carrying the codec. h : sgtsanity
      
      It doesn't make life any harder on web developers who want to ship h.264-in-<video> and rely on noncompli... : Zero|DPX
      
      I don't see why <video> should be any different from <img>. Let the format wars settle down orthogonally ... : uncleanmonkey
  - toggle
    WebM isn't open either. : BouillonCubes
    - toggle
      it's a royalty free, open source code video container. if you can keep denying it all you want, but you'... : harold.johnson
      
      toggle
      You can argue that WebM is open in just the same way that you can argue that h264 is closed. It's fuzzy ... : BouillonCubes
      
      That ars article is terribad and is pretty well refuted in subsequent links : indosauros
      
      toggle
      i read that article, and your inability to even consider another view point, coupled with your instance o... : harold.johnson
      
      toggle
      How is the same not true of everything you're saying? You're not willing to discuss as anyone who doesn't... : batkiwi
      
      toggle
      i've looked at it all, i've tried to understand it as best i could. he's repeating the same things over ... : harold.johnson
      
      But you're just repeating the same thing over and over... : batkiwi
      
      toggle
      Google has granted indefinite free patent rights on the VP8 codec. Is this also true of h264? : jim bone
      
      toggle
      Yes*. http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/08/mpeg-la-counters-google-webm-with-permanent-royalty-morat : BlackCat9
      
      But no, you still have to pay to encode stuff in H.264 : ysbreker
- UNSURPRISINGLY : virus
- toggle
  I DKWTF when it comes to the next format war we're looking at, but two observations: 1) It seems like ... : MercFox1
  - Their statement, as in the statement by MPEG LA. : MercFox1
  - 2 - same reason MP3 and GIF got support early on, because it's a useful format. : mikecyb
- toggle
  so does this mean microsoft has to rescue us from apple and google or what : Downforce
  - toggle
    Microsoft is (wisely I guess) pretty much silent on this subject. But will only natively support H.264 in... : ysbreker
    - Not that silent: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tims/archive/2011/01/11/an-open-letter-from-the-president-of-the... : Serpico74
  - it's kind of funny that IE9 will be the only browser to support H.264 and WebM in the video tag. I do be... : mikecyb
- As someone who wants to sell his animations online someday, I looked up what it would cost to license H26... : jipey
- toggle
  I think it's retarded what they are doing. Having said that, isn't the best way to fight against this is ... : ovrlrd
  - Yeah, they really need to just stop using the word 'open' when talking about shit. There is nothing open ... : pancake humper

red	r{...}r	italics	/[...]/
green	g{...}g	bold	b[...]b
blue	b{...}b	quote	q[...]q
yellow	y{...}y	sample	s[...]s
limegreen	l[...]l	underline	_[...]_
orange	n[...]n	strike	-[...]-
multisync	p[...]p	spoiler	o[...]o
olive	e[...]e	code	/{{...}}/