Blizzard Discusses StarCraft 2 Balance, Patch 1.2

42
After launching patch 1.1 for StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty last week, Blizzard has given PC Gamer a peek at plans for patch 1.2. The patch, which Blizzard hopes to launch this year, is described by SC2 lead producer Chris Sigaty as "largely our e-sport patch."

"A couple of big things that will be in there are support for the season rolling, so players can look at the history of how they did in past seasons. There will be bugfixes, balance changes and tweaks, too," Sigaty explained. "Chat is the other major thing we want to get in there next patch. We'll also add more significant features to the editor."

On the hot topic of balance, Sagaty says "We're being very cautious about making large swinging changes right now because at the highest level things are actually very strong. The things that we'll probably be addressing are the 2v2 and larger scale games. Ultimately, the 1 to 1 is what we want to keep as sacred as possible, but as a result right now there are some things that we need to address in the 2v2 at the higher level. We'll be looking at ways to do that without affecting the 1v1 balance."

Though the North American Top 200 ranking and current GSL tournament are being dominated by Terran and Protoss players, Sagaty insists that the Zerg race is not underpowered. "That's not actually the case," he says. "We have fewer Zerg players overall."

Sagaty explains that he personally finds Zerg too complex for his liking, implying that others might too. A genuine imbalance could also explain the dearth of Zerg, though even the mere perception of imbalance may be enough to scare some players away.

"We'd like [patch 1.2] out by the end of the year," Sagaty says, though he warns balance "is an ongoing process that, honestly, will take a year or longer to do. Even after [StarCraft's expansion pack] Brood War was released we still patched and continued to drive towards a really solid final balance."

From The Chatty
  • reply
    September 27, 2010 8:21 AM

    Oh and you don't think there are fewer Zerg players because it's slightly imbalanced against Zerg?

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 8:25 AM

      No, I think it's because Zerg is a harder race to play.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 8:29 AM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 8:29 AM

        Despite what people may think, Terran has always been the hardest race to master. It's the EASIEST to pick up and learn, but master their strats is the hardest of all the races.

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 8:39 AM

          In SCBW, Terran was harder to play compared to the other races. There was a lot of micro management with buildings, abilities, and spells.

          In SC2, this is definitely not the case. Their units have great synergy, there are only a few abilities / spells that are needed (one can argue that all you need is stim tbh), and you largely do not have to worry about unit composition as MMM is very cost effective against almost anything.

          SC2 also has more emphasis on the larva management coupled with creep management for zerg. Just for these reasons, zerg is just harder to play.

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 10:20 AM

          In Brood War. Not so far in SC2.

          The race really started to show its potential once players got out of the "must go bioball" mentality toward the end of beta.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 10:08 AM

        No, they simply have a weaker early game

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 8:35 AM

      If you tell people that there are fewer Zerg, they believe Zerg is underpowered, and thus less people choose Zerg, and thus more people think it's underpowered, and so on and so forth. You cannot trust the movements of the herd as an indicator of the validity of any statement, because it so easily gives way to domino effects.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 9:37 AM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 10:10 AM

          And the fact that Idra is arguably the best SC2 player out there means nothing? He was wiping the floor with other players last time I checked. Siege Tanks have been nerfed against Zerg masses, Thors are no longer as much of a threat against Mutas for good players, there's a great dynamic going on with Baneling use, Brood Lords remain goddamn infuriating for pretty much any enemy force, any player not putting constant pressure on Zerg will allow them to create an unholy number of larvae for instant army replacement...

          • reply
            September 27, 2010 10:39 AM

            [deleted]

            • reply
              September 27, 2010 11:46 AM

              There is one more zerg left I think

            • reply
              September 27, 2010 12:21 PM

              Cool beat his opponent in the Ro16, with the first and second games being the best zerg games I've seen in the GSL. Check is the zerg that lost.

            • reply
              September 27, 2010 2:12 PM

              [deleted]

          • reply
            September 27, 2010 2:00 PM

            Protoss has no problems with Brood Lords. I can almost see Terran having a problem, except Vikings rape Broodlords and Corruptors.

            • reply
              September 27, 2010 2:13 PM

              Brood lords are so ridiculously expensive in both cost and time that they're rarely ever fielded.

              The main difficulty in dealing with them is to target fire the unit, not the spawn. Attack moving around them will usually cause the units to target fire the spawn, because the brood lord is out of range.

            • reply
              September 27, 2010 5:15 PM

              Sure, Vikings, Blink Stalkers, Corruptors and whatnot will take them out, but MOST of the enemy forces will be struggling to deal with the onslaught of broodlings and the attached Zerg force, or it won't be all that easy to reach them if it's a raid at the back of your main while the large majority of the Zerg force is turning your expansions into rubble. They laugh in the face of stationary defences, and that's what I meant by infuriating.

              I stopped playing after I finished the SP and got most of the Hard achievements on account of having a simple brain incapable of dealing with multiple threads at once, mind, so most of my experience is either old, at slow speed, or from Day9/Psy narrated replays.

          • reply
            September 27, 2010 7:49 PM

            I'd reckon that Idra isn't even top five at the moment, and once the old BW pros get into SC2, he won't even be top ten.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 10:08 AM

        That would be true, if it wasn't pretty clear that zerg have a handicap, for lack of a better word

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 8:01 PM

        The high level play is pretty balanced imo, but the low level play, its all about the MMM. Do you think they could balance lower level play without affecting the higher level play?

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 8:40 AM

      It's probably NOT imbalanced, or if it is, just slightly so. Its just that zerg is hard to play. There are a lot more things you need to be aware of than with Terran or Protoss, and a slip up in your timings can prematurely end an otherwise even game.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 9:47 AM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 1:31 PM

          The problem with playing zerg is keeping up with the opponent in terms of economy and army. Zerg tends to have periods of macroing really hard and periods of making bursts of units in the early / mid game. Learning the timings of these can be extremely difficult when

          1) you're mostly in the dark of what the opponent is doing
          2) have to adjust if your opponent is doing a quirky timing attack
          3) there are tons of different timing attacks that they have to worry about

          This, along with an unforgiving larva mechanic, and a APM intensive creep mechanic, make zerg extremely difficult to play. Now start looking at the map pool and how constricting it is, and you have a recipe for the hardest race to play.

          This is why you don't see as many zerg players. People get frustrated losing to lower rated players consistently. It's also aggravating seeing opponents executing easy strategies (4 warp gate push for example) and rolling over the zerg players because they did an extra round of drones instead of units. The margin of error for zerg is razor thin.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 10:09 AM

        no, it is imbalanced. Most of us normal players would probably never know, but it's pretty clear

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 1:09 PM

          No, zerg is really, really hard to play.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 9:12 PM

        Can't being harder to play make the race underpowered? If a Zerg player has to have twice the skill level to merely be an even match against a Terran player, he aught to just switch races and dominate the opponent.

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 8:52 AM

      zerg early game is totally fucked against terran/toss but their late game is pretty awesome. considering most matches only last 10-15 minutes this is sort of a problem.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 10:09 AM

        that's the main point yes. But other small things like the queen boosting vs mule drops and chronoboost also affect the game

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 3:19 PM

        That's actually not really true. Zerg mid game is strong...late game is awful. A 200 supply Terran army beats any 200 supply Zerg army.

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 8:03 PM

          Not if you have broodlords! I seriously don't see enough broodlords =[

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 9:09 AM

      IdrA...one of the top Zerg players in the world commented on the 1.1 patch and made some interesting remarks: http://myeg.net/article/article_detail.php?article_id=877

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 9:41 AM

      Yeah what the fuck - it's pretty much a fact - they have an uphill battle the first 20 minutes - and I'm not even a zerg player.
      Whenever I get beaten by a Zerg player, I always know it's skill which got him there.

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 10:25 AM

      The ladder maps generally suck for zerg, especially at high levels of play.

      I also wonder what Blizzard considers "high levels" of play. Platinum? Diamond? The skill difference from top of Diamond to bottom of Diamond is completely insane, so judging balance based on all of Diamond (or even Platinum or Gold) is probably not accurate.

      As far as the "Blizzard is trying to balance for everyone, not just the pros" bullshit, Platinum and below the players are generally making such large and crippling mistakes in their fundamental play that makes it either pointless or damned near impossible (or worthless) to balance for them. Stuff like "expanding" or "building more than a dozen workers in a 45 minute match" would help their game immensely, not any sort of balance tweak.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 11:13 AM

        It is unfortunate that Zerg is so map sensitive. No ability to wall off and no cliff jumping units makes this hard. Mutas are the only unit that can deal with ledges, but they really aren't good for defense.

        I think they definitely need to give Zerg some sort of ability to handle cliffs since Zerg has almost no way to handle a tank drop on Lost Template or Collossi on Kulas. This would make them far less map dependent.

        I don't know what that ability would be though...

        • reply
          September 27, 2010 11:33 AM

          All races are map sensitive to some degree... it just seems like most are designed for Terran first and protoss second.

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 11:34 AM

        [deleted]

    • reply
      September 27, 2010 2:57 PM

      i believe 10 of the korean top 20 are zerg, us lazy whiteys don't have the apm i guess

      • reply
        September 27, 2010 3:28 PM

        How do you define "top 20" ? Ladder, international tournaments, or...?

    • reply
      September 28, 2010 11:23 AM

      MMM is cheap, fast, and easy. They do "The RIght Thing" when a-moved, and are pretty damned strong against anything - particularly with Stim. Very, very little micro is necessary.

      Compare that to Zerg, where *very* heavy micro, intelligent splitting of unit pools, positioning, etc... is necessary to be able to compete.

      Look at the Thor vs. Muta debacle. A-move a Thor, and it does "The Right Thing" in attacking an unmicroed group of Mutas. Specific action is necessary on the part of the Zerg player to have his/her units do "The Right Thing" - without sufficient micro, the Mutas clump and die tragically. With sufficient micro, they succeed.

      This isn't to say that micro doesn't help the other races - but it's absolutely required to come close to matching performance as Zerg.

      IMHO they need to modify the other two races to be just as micro-heavy as Zerg is, or find ways to make Zerg units do "The Right Thing" more often.

      Side-note: There's no tutorials on how to beat a Protoss cannon rush or fast Void Ray build. Nor are there tutorials on beating early Reapers, or breaking a sieged-up Terran. But there's one to specifically teach folks an easy counter to early Zerg aggression. Seems a little unfair, really.

Hello, Meet Lola