• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Shack E3 Wrapup

by Steve Gibson, May 16, 2000 2:29am PDT
Related Topics – E3, Games: PC

Ok guys, here is my E3 Wrap-up article. I run through 15 different games that were shown at the event. I even included scores just to piss people off and get irate emails from developers. The scores are basically my overall feeling of how the game showed at E3 and are not a reflection or prediction of the final product. (You never know). Other stuff from E3 for you guys:

- Steve's E3 Misc Pictures - Maarten's E3 Pictures - E3 Screenshot Archive - Shack Boothbabes
This is my first real attempt at a cohesive wrap-up of E3 games in a single article. Personally I think I am a horrible writer, but now we have documented proof!




Comments

69 Threads | 109 Comments











  • steve has an id bias? i don't think it's that heavy, he reports a lot of q3 stuff, but as he's said, a good majority of people here do support id, not just the messageboard people. and also, he gave the mission pack a 7.2, and said he cringed every time he saw the trip mine. I agree with too much hype to fairly judge daikatana, though..it's not out of respect for romero, it's more, we've had so much fun bashing daikatana before it came out, how can he not have a bias before even playing it that it sucks? although i guess to some degree, every game has that sort of bias...okay i'm done
















  • i want to have sex with tribes 2, maybe.

    i heard that dynamix was capping player speeds by class in the next tribes 1 patch. or was that just me imagining that?

    my main concerns with tribes 1 were the newbie-unfriendly setup (like a very poor tutorial, and the equipment setup that required you understand it before you did it), and the fact that weapons didn't hit where you were aiming when you fired (regardless of whether it's "correct" or not, it was not what i was used to from all my other games).

    i'm pretty psyched about the single player portion of tribes 2. if it's any good, it might be enough to get me online.

    pup (i vow that my next post will will not contain any parentheses, except in the sig!)


  • Sorry, hehehe, here's the right version:

    1) Warcraft3: 9.5 The most impressive thing I saw.
    2) Anachronox: 9.3 This Rocks!
    3) TRIBES2: 8.9 I liked it
    4) FAKK2: : 8.6 I like boobs.
    5) Alice: 8.1 It's Quake 3's engine.
    6) Star Trek Voyager: Elite Forces: 8.0 Ooh! Zinger!
    7) Deus Ex: 7.3 I couldnÂ’t make up my mind.
    8) Black & White: 7.2 This one was too complicated for me but I like eye candies.
    8) Quake3 MissionPack: 7.2 I wonÂ’t get what I want :(
    9) Return To Wolfenstien: 7.1 ThereÂ’s nothing new here, yet.
    10) Max Payne: 6.5 Not as good as I expected.
    11) Halo: 6.4 I didnÂ’t get to see what I wanted to see.
    12) Giants: 5.5 This sucks!
    C&C Renegade: ? Beer was more important.
    Daikatana: ? I couldnÂ’t stop laughing.








  • Here's sum up:

    1) Warcraft3: 9.5 The most impressive thing I saw.
    2) Anachronox: 9.3 This Rocks!
    3) TRIBES2: 8.9 I liked it
    4) FAKK2: : 8.6 I like boobs.
    5) Alice: 8.1 It's Quake 3's engine.
    6) Star Trek Voyager: Elite Forces: 8.0 Ooh! Zinger!
    7) Deus Ex: 7.3 I couldnÂ’t make up my mind.
    8) Black & White: 7.2 This one was too complicated for me but I like eye candies.
    8) Quake3 MissionPack: 7.2 I wonÂ’t get what I want :(
    9) Return To Wolfenstien: 7.1 ThereÂ’s nothing new here, yet.
    10) Max Payne: 6.5 Not as good as I expected.
    11) Halo: 6.4 I didnÂ’t get to see what I wanted to see.
    12) Giants: 5.5 This sucks!
    C&C Renegade: ? Beer was more important.
    Daikatana: ? I couldnÂ’t stop laughing.

    PS I'm just a little bored :)