Bethesda Sues Interplay over Fallout, MMO Rights
by Chris Faylor, Sep 14, 2009 11:07am PDTFallout 3 developer and Fallout property owner Bethesda has filed a lawsuit against former owner Interplay to clarify that Interplay no longer holds any rights to the franchise.
Bethesda, which purchased the post-apocalyptic property from Interplay for $5.75 million, says Interplay never sought the necessary approval to re-release the original Fallout games at retail or via digital distribution, and no longer holds the Fallout MMO license.
Bethesda further claims that Interplay's unapproved re-releases of Fallout, Fallout 2 and Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel though the "Fallout Trilogy," "Fallout Collection" and "Saga Fallout" bundles are "confusingly similar to Fallout 3" and "are in direct competition with Bethesda's Goods and cannibalizes on sales of 'Fallout 3.'"
Interplay's supposed continuing development of the Fallout MMO is also at issue, as Bethesda argues the MMO license was automatically terminated in April 2009 after Interplay failed to meet the conditions established two years ago.
Two days before Bethesda claims that the MMO license automatically terminated, Interplay sent a letter stating it was "in compliance with the requirements" and requesting an amendment so that it could "ultimately launch the FALLOUT MMOG to be compatible with and accessible on both handheld devices and consoles" in addition to PC. Bethesda denied this, contending that Interplay had failed to raise $30 million and enter "full-scale development," as the agreement mandated, by April 4, 2009.
Furthermore, Bethesda says that Interplay never formally responded to its declaration that the agreement had terminated, which invited Interplay to "dispute the forfeiture of license rights...within seven (7) days." Days later though, Interplay filed an annual report in which it "adamantly disputes" its failure to meet certain requirements of the agreement.
Interplay also violated the Fallout MMO license agreement, Bethesda says, when it entered into a funding and development partnership for the project with a third-party, Masthead Studios, without the necessary approval from Bethesda.
But while one of Interplay SEC filings appears to suggest that Masthead's project, codenamed Project V13, is separate from the Fallout MMO, Bethesda claims that V13 is a reference to Vault 13, "both the starting location and the the initial working title of the original Fallout game." In addition, concept art for Project V13 contains references to the Fallout universe, such as "Nuka Cola."
In compensation, Bethesda seeks unspecified monetary damages, including "Bethesda's damages and Interplay's profits...for Interplay's willful violation of Bethesda's registerd trademarks," and a declaration that Interplay's "continuing use of the FALLOUT Mark without authorization constitutes willful infringement."
Killzone: Mercenary shoots onto Vita on September 10
Trion Worlds hit with more layoffs, Defiance team impacted
Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault defending Vita next week
Game & Wario was originally going to be pre-installed on Wii U
The Last of Us digital download lets you start playing sooner








Comments
They did by the rights to the fallout series but there contract specifically said that they would let Interplay produce an MMO April 2009 (I don't remeber hearing anything about this 30 million dollar crap). Interplay did start development by then but from what i understand Bethesda has been saying the development wasn't "full-scale" what does full-scale even mean, probably means a different thing to each company because they don't follow some specific developers starting guide each time they begin developing a game.
And all this stuff about redistributing the older fallout games... theirs nothing wrong with interplay doing so, although I do believe Bethesda deserves a very small portion of the sales after all they do now own the rights to the story. But they shouldn't be getting a cut because it's interfering with fallout 3 sales... every game that's being sold interferes with sales, and if anything the older fallout games interfere less than those other games because if people are getting interested in the fallout story then that should mean that more people will in turn buy fallout 3. (Even if it's not as good as it's previous titles the people who are looking to buy it wont know until thy buy it.)
That's almost the end of my rant, but I have one last message to Bethesda stop publishing other companies crappy games it's ruining your rep. ohh and make your next Elder Scrolls game more like Morrowind and less like Oblivion. (sorry that was two things not one)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 11 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 20 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 13 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Interplay seems to be in enough trouble as it is, and now Bethesda is breathing down their neck with this crap.
I'm glad they released F1 and F2 on GOG.com, of course they're "confusingly similar to Fallout 3", it pretty much rips entire parts out of those games, with slight changes. It's pretty damn obvious F3 was mostly based on F2. They should have called it Fallout 2: Return to the Wastes - 3D Rip-Off Edition.
It's funny because I played F3 first, and enjoyed it for the most part, sure the combat was pathetically bad, it was unstable and the quests felt unrewarding; but the universe was there, and it was cool. Or so I thought....
That was over a year ago, so recently I bought Fallout 1, got through it all thinking "well, this is pretty damn good! Fallout 3 is at least on par with this, they've done pretty well."
Then I bought Fallout 2 ASAP to continue with the adventure and suddenly I found myself basically playing Fallout 3, in 2D, except with a proper storyline, hugely rewarding quests and great humour.
Fallout 3 added and modified parts of Fallout 2, sure, but they all seem like such insignificant changes. Meanwhile they clearly didn't put the same amount of effort and love into their game as Black Isle did.
If Fallout 2 is a finely crafted diamond, then Fallout 3 took that a hammer to that diamond and used the pieces as decorations on a cake made of shit.
I don't play MMOs, but if did I wouldn't want Bethesda making a Fallout one.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Game companies don't seem to understand the option of just not buying or buying more. They think there is only one choice buyers can make and it's a choice between their product and someone elses. Piracy is also considered a product... that people buy...
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
that would be like, irony, or something.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
You must be logged in to post.