Morning Discussion
by Alice O'Connor, Aug 24, 2009 4:15am PDTOh, it's all fun and games here at Shacknews. Chris gallivants around QuakeCon, cosying up to id CEOs and superstars. Nick kicks back at BlizzCon to reacquaint himself with his dear friend the wizaaaaaaard and befriend Diablo 3's monk. Even Maarten's in on the fun, hitting up Gamescom to enjoy countless video games in a sophisticated European manner including Borderlands, which he said looked particularly splendid before sucking on a clove cigarillo.
Me? Well, knowing that events are far more work than they might appear to be, I'm secretly a little glad that I end up staffing the office to post the flood of media, even if it does mean I miss out on playing all the fancy pants video games before the hoi polloi.
Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag for PC to come after consoles
DTS Headphone:X brings 11.1 channel surround sound to headsets
Xbox One policy change means loss of family sharing, disc-free gaming
Crytek working on The Collectibles for iOS
The War Z renamed Infestation: Survivor Stories due to 'trademark issues'
Microsoft reverses stance on 24-hour check-in, used games for Xbox One [update]
Mobile review: XCOM: Enemy Unknown
Sony apologizes for faulty PS3 update, investigating cause
Killer is Dead preview: Mondo uncertainty
Beyond my own good judgement I actually bought this over the weekend so that my brother and I could play through it via coop. After 4 hours, it became evident (as expected) that the game itself isn't very good, is very buggy, and odly laggy via local coop.
For those who have played it, is it worth it to keep going, does it get better?
I'm playing on 360 btw, which for me so far proves that a game such as this (Diablo 3 anyone?) can work perfectly on a console, but Sacred 2 itself just seems to suck.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 38 replies.
You must be logged in to post.