• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Time Warner Revises, Defends Bandwidth Caps: 'Unlimited Usage at Turbo Speeds' $150 Per Month

by Chris Faylor, Apr 10, 2009 10:46am PDT

As it continues to field test metered bandwidth usage in the U.S., internet provider Time Warner has revised, detailed and defended its current and upcoming trials.

The revisions include a lower-priced entry plan and higher data caps. The company argues that tiered plans--in which customers have a set bandwidth limit and are charged if they go over--are necessary because "Internet demand is rising at a rate that could outpace capacity within a few years" and "could result in Internet brownouts."

Overage charges will be limited to $75 per month. "That means that for $150 per month customers could have virtually unlimited usage at Turbo speeds," said the company.

Time Warner is not alone in its hopes to bring the model, which is already used overseas, to the United States. Many worry about the impact this could have on gaming, especially as digital downloads and streaming services like OnLive gain popularity.

The company stressed that these are trials, adding "our plans will evolve as well and aren't set in stone" and that it looks "forward to more dialogue as we progress in these trials." An e-mail address was provided for that feedback, realideas@twcable.com.

The program rolls out to Rochester, N.Y., and Greensboro, N.C. in August, and will expand to San Antonio and Austin, TX in October. More details follow below, pulled directly from the company's official response to "the passionate feedback."

It will take a lot of money to fix the problem. Rather than raising prices on all customers or limiting usage, we think the fairest approach is to move to a tiered model in which users pay more if they use more.

If we don't act, consumers' Internet experience will suffer. Sitting still is not an option. That's why we're beginning the consumption based billing trials. It's important to stress that they are trials. The feedback we've received from our customers has been very helpful. We've made changes to the terms in our current and upcoming trial markets as follows:

  • To accommodate lighter Internet users and those who need a lower priced option, we are introducing a 1 GB per month tier offering speeds of 768 KB/128 KB for $15 per month. Overage charges will be $2 per GB per month. Our usage data show that about 30% of our customers use less than 1 GB per month.

  • We are increasing the bandwidth tier sizes included in all existing packages in the trial markets to 10, 20, 40 and 60 GB for Road Runner Lite, Basic, Standard and Turbo packages, respectively. Package prices will remain the same. Overage charges will be $1 per GB per month.

  • We will introduce a 100 GB Road Runner Turbo package for $75 per month (offering speeds of 10 MB/1 MB). Overage charges will be $1 per GB per month.

  • Overage charges will be capped at $75 per month. That means that for $150 per month customers could have virtually unlimited usage at Turbo speeds.

  • Once we implement this trial, we will not immediately start billing customers for overage. Rather, we will first provide two months of usage data. Then we will provide a one-month grace period in which overages will be noted on customers' bills, but they will not be charged. So, customers will have an opportunity to assess their usage and right-size their service packages before usage charges are applied.

  • Trials will begin in Rochester, N.Y., and Greensboro, N.C., in August. We will apply what we learn from these two markets when we launch trials in San Antonio and Austin, Texas, in October, but we will guarantee at least the same level of usage capacity in these trials.

  • As we launch DOCSIS 3.0 in the trial markets, we plan to offer a 50/5 MB speed tier for $99 per month.




Comments

37 Threads | 80 Comments




  • On the other hand, the mindset of these people (warner etc) is very old. They never understood internet and never bothered to take full advantage of it, instead imposing their old model on something that refuses to be molded into anything but what it is.

    Their monopoly will fall and because they refused to adapt with time - it will die out completely. The only thing they own right now is the fiber. Its not too far off until we will not need their cables anymore.

    I am glad this is happening to be honest. Its a stimuli to develop something new.


  • Well at least you guys are only getting this now.. since dsl came to iceland there has been limit, there was ~1-2 years when they lifted it but bought it back late last year and, specially since more stuff is going online etc, the ISP i have (Síminn) has 10 gb per week = 40 gb a month, and if go over that then your net will be crippled in speed for the rest of that week and the next week, they don't charge if you go over but it's like your internet has turned into a 56k.

    The other big ISP here [Vodafone] (are only 2-3 here) has 40 gb per month but if you go over it, they pretty much close the internet (happened to my uncles last month), they used to charge always when you go over but would almost prefer that then what they're using now, cause it's almost just made to annoy you.
    You can download how ever much you want if it's kinda within the country but that's very litle use cause not like you can download games (legally, not even sure with illegally)

    by the way it's around 4000-5000 krónur or ~ US$45-ish

















  • I really do understand that this is probably inevitable. More and more people are discovering things like Youtube, Hulu, Netflix streaming, direct download games at 4-8GB a pop, etc. I know they have to pay for bigger pipes both within their local loop and backbone bandwidth, but $1/GB seems absolutely obscene.

    And I'm REALLY concerned about those content providers colluding with the ISPs for discounts or rate changes for bandwidth to specific services. i.e. "$1/GB, except for Hulu which is 50GB free a month because they pay us". And then the internet is no longer what it was. We need net neutrality legislation to stop that kind of collusion that will just let the fat ones get fatter and leave small providers SOL.













  • I'm torn on this. Not sympathetic at all given the fact that I pay about that much for satellite internet and have a 500MB a day limit and high latency (I was willing to pay 300 bucks a month for ISDN, but the phone company kept putting new road blocks in my way until I finally gave up after they wanted a blank check for "designing a circuit". I need to move...but that takes time, so in the mean time I'm stuck with no DSL, Cable, or EVDO of any sort (its either 26.4k dial up or the satellite I have...or 600 bucks a month for T1 with a 2 year commitment...which I just couldn't bring myself to pay).

    On the other hand I don't like the bandwidth caps...I think they're setting a bad precedent...though this model seems to be less evil than simply cutting people off and I'd be more than willing to pay that (I already am for far far less service).