Book Claims IBM Research for Sony's Cell Processor Directly Benefitted Microsoft in Console Race
by Nick Breckon, Dec 31, 2008 1:51pm PSTThe Wall Street Journal reports that a new book by IBM engineers has revealed some startling facts about the most recent console race.
"The Race for a New Game Machine," by IBM engineers David Shippy and Mickie Phipps, details how research conducted for Sony's Cell processor--used in the PlayStation 3--ended up directly benefiting the development of Micorosft's Xbox 360 chip.
The Journal summarizes:
All three of the original partners had agreed that IBM would eventually sell the Cell to other clients. But it does not seem to have occurred to Sony that IBM would sell key parts of the Cell before it was complete and to Sony's primary videogame-console competitor. The result was that Sony's R&D money was spent creating a component for Microsoft to use against it.
Mr. Shippy and Ms. Phipps detail the resulting absurdity: IBM employees hiding their work from Sony and Toshiba engineers in the cubicles next to them; the Xbox chip being tested a few floors above the Cell design teams. Mr. Shippy says that he felt "contaminated" as he sat down with the Microsoft engineers, helping them to sketch out their architectural requirements with lessons learned from his earlier work on Playstation.
The article notes that while both chip designs were shipped off to manufacturing on time, a problem with production caused Microsoft to receive its chips first, allowing Microsoft to beat Sony to the market with the Xbox 360.
Unreal 'Samaritan' demo requires ten times Xbox 360's processing power
Sony spending $50 million on Vita marketing campaign
Minecraft Pocket for Android adds zombies, Survival mode
Nintendo acquires Mobiclip
Steam knocked offline on Sunday by power failure
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Though I always figured there was some mixing between the two R&D efforts since that would be really hard to avoid being both contracted the same company to do the R&D, though I'm sure MS's CPU was easier to R&D compared to Cell.
MS contracted ATi to make the Xenos GPU which I'm pretty cure ATi leveraged for their Radeon graphics chips. Though those two are different fields of competition.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 14 replies.
Sony paid for the design of the unique parts of the Cell processor, and not the billions of dollars that IBM has spent developing the PowerPC architecture over the years (in partnership with Motorola).
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Lets pretend Sony and MS didn't know this was going on and write a book about it? Ooooo scadalous!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 11 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 11 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Is he saying that he shared lessons learned on the G5 PPU modifications on the 360? If so, that sounds a lot less iffy (even though Sony contractually allowed it in the first place, making this a non-story).
MS getting to the market first at a hardware level had more to do with them diverging less from established tech (G5 processor) than Sony required more 'new' manufacturing with the SPUs and bluray. From the article:
"Both designs were delivered on time to IBM's manufacturing division, but there was a problem with the first chip run. Microsoft had had the foresight to order backup manufacturing capacity from a third party."
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
and look at all of you, eating it right up. so willing to accuse anybody of being morally bankrupt, as if all parties involved were not already so. take a deep fucking breath and realize who your talking about.
realize that this is a book and could be a work of fiction, or non.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
I feel like the article is trying very hard to make it seem like IBM used Sony R&D funds to work on a Microsoft part when such was not the case.