3.28 Terabit Speed
by Maarten Goldstein, Mar 24, 2000 7:01am PSTCable? hah. ADSL? pfff..3.28 terabit per second is where it's at. The guys at Lucent's Bell Labs have managed that according to Wired (thanks Roshi).
A terabit -- thats a trillion bits -- is roughly equal to all of the daily traffic on the Internet for the entire world. The Lucent fiber could transmit three times the daily global Internet traffic every second.That's a whole lotta por..err, data. And better yet, they expect to get much higher as the lasers get better. Of course, when we are going to see the next wave of speed increase ourself remains to be seen.
FileShack: Unity of Command, Skyjacker
Daily Filter: Planetside 2, Deadlight
Weekend PC digital deals: strategy-o-rama
38 Studios, Harry Potter Kinect - Shacknews Daily: May 25, 2012
Minecraft for Xbox 360 dev working on 'Adventure' update
Comments
http://www.ciena.com/products/corestream/index.html
A friend of mine works there, and I got to see one of their systems. You have to wear all kinds of anti-static gear just to be in the same room with it. It also takes up more space than you might think.
-chillin
dlrty rules
end of story
#shugashack
plasma.bfg10k.com
Fight The Man!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
A terabit == all the traffic worldwide for one day?
A terabit == 1000 gigabits (right?)
1000 gigabits == 125 gigabytes (8 bits == one byte)
There's only 125 gigabytes of traffic daily on the internet? I really really really don't believe that statistic, unless they're NOT counting all the warez and mp3s and pr0n being traded on FTPs, etc. Maybe they're only talking about port 80 traffic.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Fucking hurts when I stick it in my computer though.
It is not how fast the light can go, since light speed is a contant. The problem arises with the strength of the laser beam. If you have the sending laser device and the recieving device too close together, the receiver can get burnt out. There are reducing lenses that can reduce the signal strength to somthing that the receiver (and hence the networks) can handle. Having too much signal is just like having not enough signal... :-)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 1 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 1 replies.
I did a 2 week update of 6 games(fps)taken from ALL servers not just gamespy from wed,friday and saturday and compiled them.(these include mods) here's what I got:
#1 Half-Life #Servers- 6492 - #Players- An obscene 12,297
#2 Tribes #Servers- 3689- #Players- 7,834
#3 Unreal Tournament #Servers- 2,290 - #Players - 4,589
#4 Quake Arena #Servers - 1,957 - #Players - 3,429*
#5 Quake 2 #Servers - 1,319 - #Players - 2,428
#6 Quake 1 #servers - 483 - #Players - 672
As you can see, Half Life continues to dominate the servers and players which I presume is due to the TFC and CS mods. Tribes seems to be very popular in heavy TP action which is what the game was made for. While UT and Q# seem to be close with UT edging out in the lead with servers and players. Q2 coming in 5th and Quake 1 still holding up which might be the due to the release of the source code? Kind of interesting though when you look at it.
*One thing interesting though is the Q3 servers, Because alot of them have BOTS on the servers(up to 4) until humans join then 1 bot gets dropped to replace every human that connects.(This proved to be the most interupted server reading because people would drop out more often then other games due to "bots" being on the servers?)I still included them on the list because it would be a bitch to sort out all of the bots on the servers at any given time.(Maybe someone else would want to do it)
This does not include AC which is a RPG which beats out HL with a whopping 15,000+ player list.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 1 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/03/000316110558.htm
Think about this. Say you have an Ultra SCSI-2 160 hard drive. That's 160 MB per second. Multiply by 8, and you get about 1 Gb (that's gigabits) per second. Even a 1-terabit connection, then, is about 1000 times faster than that hard drive. Heck, even that powerline technology Media Fusion is working on is expected to be about 2.5 times faster than that hard drive.
So, quite literally, the connection is too much for the system. You'd have to practically make everyone their own ISP (i.e. allow others to route through your connection) in order for it not to be a near-total waste!
Maybe waiting a few years for this wouldn't be a bad thing after all...
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
i think this technology is headed in the right direction to supply us with the pr0n of the future.
oh yeah and i hate typing my username and password for every post :P
oh yeah, i don't have a user profile due to the Æ in my name :O
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
my 9gigabit fibreoptic seems slow now :(
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Sure we need to get there ... but my wallet can wait. (and besides .. I just got DSL and don't want it obsoleted just yet! ;)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.