Comcast Sets Bandwidth Cap for Customers
by Blake Ellison, Aug 29, 2008 9:31am PDTInternet provider Comcast has announced that it will limit residential cable internet bandwidth to 250GB per month starting October 1st.
The plan, according to The Channel Wire and SFGate, does not specify a charge for going over that 250GB cap, but will have Comcast notifing customers of overages and terminating the accounts of repeat offenders.
Comcast claims that median high-speed internet use in the United States is 2 to 3GB per month, making the 250GB limit generous in most cases, but the cap looms over gamers who consume increasing amounts of bandwidth to use digital distribution services ranging from Valve's Steam, to iTunes, Netflix, Xbox Live, and the PlayStation Network.
For example, a single high-definition movie download from the Xbox Live Marketplace typically weighs around 4.5GB. Die-hard multiplayer gamers, including World of Warcraft players, need not worry: the bandwidth used by online games is far below Comcast's 250GB limit.
Gamers on other internet providers, however, may have cause for concern. Some sense that Comcast sets a dangerous precedent with the possibility from here forward that Comcast may gradually lower that cap. Other large cable providers, including Time Warner and Cox Communications, are currently testing bandwidth caps as low as 5GB.
Darksiders 2 releases June 26, pre-order bonuses announced
PlayStation Home getting avatar 'fighting' game
Girl Fight bringing fighting girls to XBLA and PSN
Skyrim Workshop touts 2M downloads, 2,500 mods
Xenonauts dev promises 'proper remake' of XCOM
Binary Domain demo available this week
Shack PSA: Angry Birds on Facebook today
Resistance: Burning Skies dawns on Vita in May
Shack PSA: Mass Effect 3 demo out today
Daily Filter: The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings Enhanced Edition, MLB 12: The Show
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
oh wait nevermind.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Glad bandwidth caps are only employed at the very low-end cheapest plans here in Sweden, and barely even there by most ISPs.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Presumably byte but ...
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.
Please continue to pay your ungodly amounts of money for subpar speeds, with new bandwidth caps, and stay away from FIOS.
Love,
A proud FIOS user
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Wait and see. 250 gigs seems pretty big right now. In a couple years, it'll be nothing. We have terabyte disk drives, guys. We have streaming movies and television. We have online delivery of content, including games, being pushed by Microsoft. My first hard drive, back in 1992, had 20 megabytes of space, and at the time that was a mind-blowingly large amount of data. There were two megabytes of RAM.
In 2000, a 400 megabyte hard drive was still adequate.
Now we're talking single-terabyte drives, and my video card has 384 times more RAM than my first computer had. That was 16 years ago. If anything, the curve is accelerating.
250 gigs is the snare.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Any bandwidth monitors out there? I'm curious what I even use now.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
What makes you think they won't lower it?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
250GB is a shit load of data. Even if you online netflix ten 10 gig movies a month that's only 100gb. That still leaves 150GB for "Linux ISOs".
It would be nice if they just offered reasonably priced tiered service. 20 GB for $35/mo, 100GB for $40/mo, 500GB for $80, etc.
Or if they just added reasonable bandwidth cost. Say after you go over, $0.05-$0.15 / GB + a base monthly fee. It seems this would encourage them to sell more data and be good for infrastructure.
Please, take my 20GB cap, I'll take your 250GB without complaining.
Just out of curiosity, how much is it monthly for that amount of bandwith?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Digital distro of everything is getting larger, not smaller.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Notably, assuming the top percentiles use exponentially more bandwidth, the median is likely a significantly lower number than the "mean", i.e. what we conventionally consider the "average". Compare incomes in the US in 2005: the median is $24,000 (that's the income in the 50th percentile), but the mean is $35,000 (that's the total national income divided by the total number of people). If "heavy" broadband users are a high percentile of broadband users, then median and mean will differ even more than this example.
This cap is reasonably high, but the US is getting stagnant for broadband growth, and it doesn't seem like the companies have much reason to invest more in the infrastructure if they can continue to push this line of limits of usage.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.