Court Orders Pirate to Reimburse Developer $30,000
by Aaron Linde, Aug 19, 2008 11:54am PDTLondon's Patents County Court has ordered an unidentified woman to pay nearly $30,000 in fines to Topware Interactive for illegally sharing one of the studio's games online, according to a Telegraph report spotted by MCV.
The woman, who is among the first to be sued for copyright violation in the United Kingdom by a game company, was fined damages of £6086.56 ($11,325) and costs and disbursements of £10,000 ($18,607) for distributing Topware's Dream Pinball 3D.
The ruling establishes a strong precedent for further action against copyright violators. London law firm Davenport Lyons, which represents Topware Interactive, is also pursuing civil proceedings against 100 people suspected of illegally uploading copyrighted software.
"Illegal file-sharing is a very serious issue resulting in millions of pounds of losses to copyright owners," said Davenport Lyons senior partner David Gore. "As downloading speeds and internet penetration increase, this continues to be a worldwide problem across the media industry which increasingly relies on digital revenues."
He added, "The damages and costs ordered by the court are significant and should act as a deterrent. This shows that taking direct steps against infringers is an important and effective weapon in the battle against online piracy."
According to the firm, London's High Court has also made a strong showing for copyright infringement, ordering internet service providers to release several thousand names and addresses of "suspected file sharers."
Daily Filter: The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings Enhanced Edition, MLB 12: The Show
Cradle trailer shows off Russian indie adventure game
WoW Monopoly, StarCraft RISK announced at Toy Fair
Jersey Shore's 'The Situation' signs App deal
Blacklight: Retribution open beta begins Feb 27
Comments
Let's disregard, for a moment, the notion that it's extremely difficult to prove that the individual did anything other than "make the game accessible for download" and "successfully transmit a copy of the game to an agent of the game company." Is this truly an effective deterrent? Copyright holders could clog up the courts from here to Beijing, and the average file-sharer would still be more likely to win the state lottery than to be the target of a lawsuit.
I still wonder if anyone has the intelligence and initiative to develop a means of encouraging people to pay for their products that isn't centered around outdated methods of control that do not reflect the realities of technology and legal rights.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 14 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.